Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-10-02 Thread teor
> On 2 Oct 2017, at 16:54, Santiago wrote: > >> El 02/10/17 a las 13:19, Scott Bennett escribió: >> grarpamp wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 3:53 AM, Santiago wrote: >> … >> >> Huh? What kind of ISP NATs its

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-10-02 Thread Santiago
El 02/10/17 a las 13:19, Scott Bennett escribió: > grarpamp wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 3:53 AM, Santiago wrote: … > > Huh? What kind of ISP NATs its customers' connections? Your ISP > should be assigning your machine/router a

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-10-02 Thread grarpamp
>> Or instead of router mode, try bridge mode feeding into any old pc running Noting that even some crappy hardware will still fall over when put in its so called "bridge" mode, which should just be some packet buffering between the wires and their encodings, but it's obviously still looking at

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-10-02 Thread Andreas Krey
On Mon, 02 Oct 2017 13:19:59 +, Scott Bennett wrote: ... > Huh? What kind of ISP NATs its customers' connections? All kinds of ISPs that were too late to grab enough IPv4 space for their customer base. Here in germany these are mostly the cable companies. Also, generally mobile IP.

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-10-02 Thread Scott Bennett
grarpamp wrote: > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 3:53 AM, Santiago wrote: > >> And you can only have 2 tor instances per public IPv4 address. > > > > Why? Is there any place where I can find this kind of info? > > Read the archives of this list linked at the

Re: [tor-relays] Feedback wanted: letter to my university's library

2017-10-02 Thread grarpamp
If for library regarding preserving knowledge, and other sales tactics You might be able to present for supporting an anonymous encrypted storage platform... such as Tahoe-LAFS, MaidSafe, IPFS, Bitcoin full nodes, Zensystem.io, a Wiki, NNTP, there are many more such "store of data /

Re: [tor-relays] Feedback wanted: letter to my university's library

2017-10-02 Thread Alison Macrina
Hi AJ, Thank you for supporting Tor! I think it's a great idea to try to work with your university library to run a relay. I run the Library Freedom Project which helps libraries understand and use privacy tools (libraryfreedomproject.org). I can give you some advice based on my experience.

Re: [tor-relays] Feedback wanted: letter to my university's library

2017-10-02 Thread Jonathan Proulx
Hi AJ, not sure if anyone's brought this up, but you may want to look at: https://libraryfreedomproject.org/ " Library Freedom Project is a partnership among librarians, technologists, attorneys, and privacy advocates which aims to address the problems of surveillance by making real the

Re: [tor-relays] Feedback wanted: letter to my university's library

2017-10-02 Thread teor
On 2 Oct 2017, at 01:18, AJ Jordan wrote: >> find out what the rules around Internet usage >> are, and just set one up. > > The problem is that logistically I can't without help, > unfortunately. I don't have a spare machine to run it on and more > importantly, I don't have

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-10-02 Thread grarpamp
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 3:53 AM, Santiago wrote: >> And you can only have 2 tor instances per public IPv4 address. > > Why? Is there any place where I can find this kind of info? Read the archives of this list linked at the bottom of every message. As an operator you'll

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-10-02 Thread teor
> On 2 Oct 2017, at 03:53, Santiago wrote: > > Hi tor-relay list, > >> El 30/09/17 a las 14:02, teor escribió: >>> On 30 Sep 2017, at 09:55, Andy Isaacson wrote: >> … >> And you can only have 2 tor instances per public IPv4 address. > > Why? It

Re: [tor-relays] Feedback wanted: letter to my university's library

2017-10-02 Thread William Denton
On 1 October 2017, AJ Jordan wrote: However I've just started college at the University of Rochester, which obviously presents a great opportunity to set up a relay on a really great network. I'm planning to reach out to the library with the following email and would love some feedback: Scott

Re: [tor-relays] Feedback wanted: letter to my university's library

2017-10-02 Thread Scott Bennett
"Tor Node Admin @ SechsNullDrei.org" wrote: > Hi AJ, > > First, thank you for supporting Tor! > > Second, you're smart to contact the library, as IT would immediately shut > down the idea as they don't want to receive more abuse emails than they > already do (I know we

Re: [tor-relays] Feedback wanted: letter to my university's library

2017-10-02 Thread Tor Node Admin @ SechsNullDrei.org
Hi AJ, First, thank you for supporting Tor! Second, you're smart to contact the library, as IT would immediately shut down the idea as they don't want to receive more abuse emails than they already do (I know we did when I worked in academia). An additional resource you may wish to research is

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-10-02 Thread Santiago
Hi tor-relay list, El 30/09/17 a las 14:02, teor escribió: > On 30 Sep 2017, at 09:55, Andy Isaacson wrote: … > And you can only have 2 tor instances per public IPv4 address. Why? Is there any place where I can find this kind of info? Maybe it's another issue, but I have