Re: [tor-relays] Alleged Family Members / Stable flag "issues"

>>Yes this entry is gone, shortly (believe 1 day) after the node was taken >>down. >>Maybe it's due to the fact I comments the MyFamily config option out, I'll >>put >>it back, just referencing itself. Maybe that will clear things out. Yep, I think that will probably fix it. You'll need to

Re: [tor-relays] Alleged Family Members / Stable flag "issues"

Hi Teor, Thanks for responding: On 14 Dec 2017, at 22:56, teor wrote: > On 15 Dec 2017, at 06:38, Stijn Jonker wrote: For a little short of a year I'm running Relay SJC01 (328E54981C6DDD7D89B89E418724A4A7881E3192), there was some unnoticed outage of the relay which

Re: [tor-relays] Alleged Family Members / Stable flag "issues"

Hi Tor, On 14 Dec 2017, at 21:37, tor wrote: The same with the Alleged Family Member, I had an relay / exit with a reduced exit policy ($F8333E028E952840C1B93DAEE20880F75B90A68A) but that has been gone for quite some weeks (months) as it was taken down by the hoster. Now all info I can find

Re: [tor-relays] exit relay

On 15 Dec 2017, at 09:14, Toralf Förster wrote: >> On 12/14/2017 11:08 PM, Sebastian Hahn wrote: >> If you don't want to run an Exit relay, set ExitRelay 0. > Not needed IMO - I'm under the impression that nowadays with recent Tor > versions a user must opt-in to

Re: [tor-relays] exit relay

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/14/2017 11:08 PM, Sebastian Hahn wrote: > If you don't want to run an Exit relay, set ExitRelay 0. Not needed IMO - I'm under the impression that nowadays with recent Tor versions a user must opt-in to configure Tor to be an exit. - --

Re: [tor-relays] exit relay

> On 14. Dec 2017, at 23:04, Evangelos Meintasis > wrote: > > Hello to all, > I got this warning : > [warn] Tor is running as an exit relay. If you did not want this behavior, > please set the ExitRelay option to 0. > > But in /etc/tor/torrc file, I can not

[tor-relays] exit relay

Hello to all, I got this warning : [warn] Tor is running as an exit relay. If you did not want this behavior, please set the ExitRelay option to 0. But in /etc/tor/torrc file, I can not locate an y EXITRELAY option. Should I just type it without comments there with the 0 flag? Thank you!

Re: [tor-relays] Alleged Family Members / Stable flag "issues"

> On 15 Dec 2017, at 06:38, Stijn Jonker wrote: > > For a little short of a year I'm running Relay SJC01 > (328E54981C6DDD7D89B89E418724A4A7881E3192), there was some unnoticed outage > of the relay which caused a couple days of downtime. This was at the end of > Nov, oddly

Re: [tor-relays] #34C3 Tor Assembly

On 14.12.2017 22:11, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:05:28PM +0100, i...@artikel5ev.de wrote: >> [...] >> It would be great to have a little bigger room than last year. > > Yes, there was a bit of a mix-up last year, so we had to make to with > the rooms that were

Re: [tor-relays] #34C3 Tor Assembly

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:05:28PM +0100, i...@artikel5ev.de wrote: > [...] > It would be great to have a little bigger room than last year. Yes, there was a bit of a mix-up last year, so we had to make to with the rooms that were still available. Best, nicoo signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [tor-relays] #34C3 Tor Assembly

Hey nicco, On 14.12.2017 21:56, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > > I will facilitate again the Tor Relays operators meetup, like in the last > couple > of years (it was previously organised by Moritz). > > It's not currently listed in the 34C3 wiki because registration for > self-organised

Re: [tor-relays] #34C3 Tor Assembly

Hi, On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:46:59PM +0100, Artikel 5 e.V. wrote: > Hello, > when I looked around in the wiki for this years Chaos Communication > Congress in Leipzig (Germany) I found that there is not much happening > around Tor. I will facilitate again the Tor Relays operators meetup, like

Re: [tor-relays] Dir address none

December 14, 2017 3:39 PM, "Fabian A. Santiago" wrote: > December 14, 2017 1:10 PM, "teor" wrote: > >>> On 15 Dec 2017, at 05:01, Fabian A. Santiago >>> wrote: >>> >>> December 14, 2017 11:50 AM, "teor"

Re: [tor-relays] Dir address none

December 14, 2017 1:10 PM, "teor" wrote: >> On 15 Dec 2017, at 05:01, Fabian A. Santiago >> wrote: >> >> December 14, 2017 11:50 AM, "teor" wrote: >> >> On 15 Dec 2017, at 03:31, Fabian A. Santiago

Re: [tor-relays] Alleged Family Members / Stable flag "issues"

> The same with the Alleged Family Member, I had an relay / exit with a reduced > exit policy ($F8333E028E952840C1B93DAEE20880F75B90A68A) but that has been > gone > for quite some weeks (months) as it was taken down by the hoster. Now all > info I can find is that when the relay doesn't

Re: [tor-relays] Removed x bytes by killing y circuits

Hi > Do you see a log line that relates to which type of "Scheduler" you are using > such as: > > [notice] Scheduler type KIST has been enabled. It's Freebsd: [notice] Scheduler type KISTLite has been enabled. > It is seriously a huge amount of circuit and very little data. For isntance >

Re: [tor-relays] Removed x bytes by killing y circuits

On 14 Dec (20:41:56), Felix wrote: > Hi everybody > > Can someone explain the following tor log entry: > > Removed 528 bytes by killing 385780 circuits; 0 circuits remain alive. > (it's the nicest one, see below) > > > Memory stays at 3 - 4 GB before and after. Only tor restart gets rid of >

[tor-relays] Removed x bytes by killing y circuits

Hi everybody Can someone explain the following tor log entry: Removed 528 bytes by killing 385780 circuits; 0 circuits remain alive. (it's the nicest one, see below) Memory stays at 3 - 4 GB before and after. Only tor restart gets rid of the memory. We love to remove 528 bytes. Tor log

[tor-relays] Alleged Family Members / Stable flag "issues"

Hi all, For a little short of a year I'm running Relay SJC01 (328E54981C6DDD7D89B89E418724A4A7881E3192), there was some unnoticed outage of the relay which caused a couple days of downtime. This was at the end of Nov, oddly enough I don't seem to get back the "Stable" flag. In searches I

Re: [tor-relays] Dir address none

> On 15 Dec 2017, at 05:01, Fabian A. Santiago > wrote: > > December 14, 2017 11:50 AM, "teor" wrote: > >>> On 15 Dec 2017, at 03:31, Fabian A. Santiago >>> wrote: >>> >>> I'm checking my Tor relay on atlas and

Re: [tor-relays] Dir address none

December 14, 2017 11:50 AM, "teor" wrote: >> On 15 Dec 2017, at 03:31, Fabian A. Santiago >> wrote: >> >> I'm checking my Tor relay on atlas and the dir address is listed as 'none'. >> I have dirport set in >> my torrc file to just a number

Re: [tor-relays] Fwd: someone is livestreaming a bad exit

Le jeudi 14 décembre 2017 à 13:16 +1100, teor a écrit : > Forwarded to bad-relays > Wikipedia has a page [1] that basically ask people not to create hoax to prove a point (most of the time the point is that Wikipedia is not reliable). Is there any page like this on the Tor project's wiki? This

Re: [tor-relays] #34C3 Tor Assembly

On Thu, December 14, 2017 6:26 am, Artikel 5 e.V. wrote: > Hello, > I forgot to mention this, but please share this information, this way we > #Tor enthusiast can use this chance to meet and share information. > > utzer > Would love to go, share and meet people. but finishing things first. Miss

Re: [tor-relays] #34C3 Tor Assembly

Hello, I forgot to mention this, but please share this information, this way we #Tor enthusiast can use this chance to meet and share information. utzer ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org