Re: [tor-relays] possible interference between sbws and a libressl relay

> On 24 Sep 2019, at 03:27, Felix wrote: > >> Am 2019-09-23 um 1:59 AM schrieb teor: >> >> We need some more information to diagnose the issue, and answer these >> questions: >> >> * Is this issue reproducible? > > In my Freebsd monoculture, yes. 20 guard relays shared the same history: > > T

Re: [tor-relays] possible interference between sbws and a libressl relay

Am 2019-09-23 um 1:59 AM schrieb teor: Hi, Hi We need some more information to diagnose the issue, and answer these questions: * Is this issue reproducible? In my Freebsd monoculture, yes. 20 guard relays shared the same history: Tor versions Tor 0.4.0.5, 0.4.1.2-alpha, 0.4.1.3-alpha,

Re: [tor-relays] possible interference between sbws and a libressl relay (was: Measuring the Accuracy of Tor Relays' Advertised Bandwidths)

On 9/21/19 4:11 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > I upgraded LibreSSL from 2.9.2 to 3.0.0 here at a stable Gentoo Linux > and got immediately from all IPv6 capable BW authorties the > "ReachableIPv6" flag back at both affected relays. Today one of 2 affected relays got its Gurad flag back. The other rel

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge stats always in multiples of 8

On 9/22/19 9:46 PM, nottryingtobel...@protonmail.com wrote: > I'm just curious as to why, in the bridge stats, all the country codes > show a multiple of 8. Thanks for your time! > It's an extremely basic attempt at hiding exactly how many bridge users there are in a given country while still pro