Re: [tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs

2022-05-27 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 07:31:41PM -0500, Thoughts wrote: > For a non-exit relay, is "NumCPUs 2" still the recommended maximum?   > Running on a quad core and recently saw a message indicating I had > insufficient CPU power to support the desired number of connections... I would suggest leaving

[tor-relays] Bridge operators contact addresses online ;-)

2022-05-27 Thread lists
I happened to see that Bridge operators contact addresses can now be displayed. https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/network-health/metrics/relay-search/-/issues/40017 Demo on Tor Metrics for all 'bauruine' and 'ForPrivacyNET' bridges. Thanks to the torproject team. -- ╰_╯ Ciao Marco! Debian

Re: [tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs

2022-05-27 Thread lists
On Thursday, May 26, 2022 2:31:41 AM CEST Thoughts wrote: > For a non-exit relay, is "NumCPUs 2" still the recommended maximum? > Running on a quad core and recently saw a message indicating I had > insufficient CPU power to support the desired number of connections... > NumCPU I always let the

Re: [tor-relays] [Workshop] Sysadmin 101 for (new) relay operators - June 4th

2022-05-27 Thread gus
Hi Isaac, The sysadmin 101 workshop for relays operators won't be recorded, but the presentation slides and notes will be shared here in the mailing list. We're planning to do more of these workshops in the future and we can try doing it on week days. Gus On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 01:09:17PM

Re: [tor-relays] Question about new log messages after 0.4.7.7 upgrade

2022-05-27 Thread gus
Hello, It's nothing serious. We're tracking down this issue here: https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor/-/issues/40612 Thanks for running & upgrading your bridge! Gus On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 03:32:46PM +, wardz via tor-relays wrote: > Been getting these syslog messages occasionally

[tor-relays] Question about new log messages after 0.4.7.7 upgrade

2022-05-27 Thread wardz via tor-relays
Been getting these syslog messages occasionally *after* the 0.4.7.7 upgrade on my bridge: -- May 26 21:00:58 torbridge Tor[ ]: Unexpected path length 4 for exit circuit 66 5, purpose 5 [3 similar message(s) suppressed in last 5400 seconds] May 26 16:26:17 torbridge kernel: [ ] TCP: eth0: Driver

[tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs

2022-05-27 Thread Thoughts
For a non-exit relay, is "NumCPUs 2" still the recommended maximum?   Running on a quad core and recently saw a message indicating I had insufficient CPU power to support the desired number of connections... Thanks, Kevin ___ tor-relays mailing

Re: [tor-relays] SPOOFED: Re: Ext Relay Operators: Please Upgrade to 0.4.7.7!

2022-05-27 Thread Kushal Das
On 20/05/22, Ladar Levison via tor-relays wrote: > On 5/20/22 8:06 AM, Kushal Das wrote: > > EPEL generally never updates anything major, and I think in this case > > they counted it as a major update. More details can be found at [0]. > > > > [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Updates_Policy