Due to the data your relay provides. If your relay gets popular I think it
will get the speed it deserves.
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:32 PM, wrote:
> Hello,
> I am running a bridge and I have my RelayBandwidthRate set to 1024 KB (8
> Mbps). However, the Relay
D8972986BE19E0287770DF51C47C630A53DC6E97
Thanks
-Aneesh
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 4:51 AM, Franklin Bynum
wrote:
> 78E2BE744A53631B4AAB781468E94C52AB73968B
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 3:06 PM, r1610091651 wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm seeing regular issues with faravahar in logs lately. Is somebody
> working on this?
>
> Logs:
> Dec 12 10:32:56.000 [warn] HTTP status 502 ("Bad Gateway") was unexpected
> while uploading descriptor to
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 9:45 PM, teor <teor2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 11 Dec 2017, at 02:17, Aneesh Dogra <lionane...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > I run a tor exit relay named "rippedlion". I was out for vacatio
Hello Everyone,
I run a tor exit relay named "rippedlion". I was out for vacation past few
days and saw I had a 2 day downtime. I had a look at the logs and
apparently /var/lib/tor got detected to be owned as ? How do I
prevent this in future?
Snippet from notices.log:
Dec 08 06:54:57.000
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:04 PM, x9p wrote:
>
> Actually this also caught my attention on this 10 nodes from 188.214.30/24:
>
> https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/188.214.30
>
> All from Romania, relays, ports 443/9030, good bandwidth 17-26MiB, uptime
> almost identical, and no
Interesting to see. I have similar stats. 10 connections from
188.214.30.0/24, second up 8 connections from 178.16.208.0/24. Thanks!
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:27 PM, x9p wrote:
>
> first measure on a good day how many connection per /24 your exit/relay
> have, excluding these with