Re: [tor-relays] Tor t-shirts

2017-10-22 Thread Dylan Issa
21 Oct 2017, at 09:06, Roger Dingledine <a...@mit.edu> wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 12:28:34AM +0100, Dylan Issa wrote: >> To add on this, if my Tor relay was restarted for a reason (resets downtime) >> but previously had ~50 days uptime, if I get the remai

Re: [tor-relays] Tor t-shirts

2017-10-20 Thread Dylan Issa
To add on this, if my Tor relay was restarted for a reason (resets downtime) but previously had ~50 days uptime, if I get the remaining 10 days am I eligible? Or must it be at least 60 days of continuous uptime? Because I had 50 days, so if I need to wait another 2 months that’ll be depressing

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

2017-10-12 Thread Dylan Issa
ster <toralf.foers...@gmx.de> wrote:-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA256On 10/11/2017 10:08 AM, Dylan Issa wrote:Did you set MyFamily using nicknames of the key?Because if nickname, change it to key is basically what it?s saying.No,both Tor processes share this common config file:grep

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

2017-10-11 Thread Dylan Issa
What the fuck I didn’t even encrypt it >.> What I said was: Did you set MyFamily using nicknames of the key? Because if nickname, change it to key is basically what it’s saying. > On Oct 10, 2017, at 8:38 PM, grarpamp wrote: > >> and pgpdump says: >> Dylan, you seem to have

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

2017-10-10 Thread Dylan Issa
binuZcno3sP4G.bin Description: PGP/MIME Versions Identification encrypted.asc Description: OpenPGP encrypted message ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Running both Transmission server and Tor relay

2017-10-07 Thread Dylan Issa
It shouldn't even matter if you torrent if you run an exit: when they say torrenting through Tor is bad: they mean as a client (using a SOCKS proxy to run your downloads through the Tor network), not torrenting whilst running a relay/exit. Running transmission alongside a Tor relay/exit won't

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

2017-09-22 Thread Dylan Issa
Definitely be careful, though, especially if they’re from the same hosting provider account. It will increase the chance of receiving an abuse report: and if someone is using Tor to attack and your exits are all picked then that chance just unfortunately increased. It would be a shame to get

Re: [tor-relays] Horizons Relay Figerprint

2017-09-21 Thread Dylan Issa
Kurt, We are both on OVH but I am on the FRA side, yet my graph seems much more steady (and I have more flags than you), despite having slightly less bandwidth and slightly less uptime. Is your server being hammered by something or in use somewhere else? My similar node:

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 80, Issue 26

2017-09-19 Thread Dylan Issa
I should think they’d be fine, considering they “allow" scanning on their servers. If they were VPSs on the OVH range they’d care, but for a dedi as long as they’re not DoSing or getting insane amounts of abuse reports you’ll be fine. If you look at the ASN on atlas there are a few long-living

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 80, Issue 26

2017-09-18 Thread Dylan Issa
Tried Kimsufi? I believe that’ll be fine. > On Sep 18, 2017, at 5:27 PM, flipchan wrote: > > https://okservers.net / doesn't provide vps :/ > something like a good ISP that tolerate exit nodes would be good like > something in holland maybe? > >