Re: [tor-relays] DigitalOcean pricing

If your concern is security you shouldn't use OpenSSL in the first place. My pick would be OpenBSD or Gentoo with LibreSSL if it's security wise. Stable is for servers great because bleeding edge might break once in awhile and for decent amount of uptime you want to keep it going without to worry

Re: [tor-relays] cheap unmetered non-exit VPS offers

There is also https://dataclub.biz <-- exit + bitcoin payment NL/SW/LV servers On July 28, 2016 3:41:04 PM GMT+02:00, tor relay wrote: > >> On July 28, 2016 at 2:48 PM Markus Koch >wrote: >> >> >> exit allowed? > >no, that is why I put "non-exit" in the subject of my email. > >https://trac.to

Re: [tor-relays] suspicious "Relay127001" relays

91 at the moment and they will soon gain more flags. https://sourceforge.net/p/nepenthes/wiki/Home/ Seems like some sort of honeypot. Most seem to be from AWS & Linode & Leaseweb USA. On July 3, 2016 10:59:00 AM GMT+02:00, nusenu wrote: >some new ones: >http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.onio

Re: [tor-relays] Filter Tor Exit Node for blatant attacks on servers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Abuse will always be there, and isn't bound by Tor exits only. There is lots of this "malicious" traffic on the internet. Mainly new/small ISPs will react heavily to abuse complaints because they don't wanna end up on certain lists (IP ranges, bad n

[tor-relays] Monitoring multiple relays

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, I have a couple relays / exits running. Now my question is : how do you manage them is there any dashboard or CLI tools to manage them ( statistics, ect.. ) I know the cli tool specially for Tor "arm" Thanks alot. - -- PGP : 29A4CE52 -BE

Re: [tor-relays] 84 exits (growing..) (was: 68 new exits)

Maybe botnet ? On May 7, 2016 2:46:31 PM GMT+02:00, Tristan wrote: >Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running a >Tor >relay of any kind is against their AUP. >On May 7, 2016 2:32 AM, "nusenu" wrote: > >> >> >> >https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/0c8ec0852a07b41

Re: [tor-relays] https://itldc.com/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Did you ask them what they say about Tor exit nodes? It's common that they don't want Exit nodes on their VPS services. Should always ask ISPs beforehand and how they deal with abuse complains. On May 1, 2016 6:12:29 PM GMT+02:00, Markus Koch wro

Re: [tor-relays] Relays by AS Names

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On April 8, 2016 7:13:17 PM GMT+02:00, ng0 wrote: >Tristan writes: > >> I think https://compass.torproject.org has all the info I need. After >> grouping by AS name for the United States, I decided to go with >Hostwinds. >> They say 100Mbps unmet

[tor-relays] Weird relay outage

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Suddenly my relay lost all it's flags plus weird bandwidth drops while the network is fully intact. Tor version 0.2.7.6 - Ubuntu server 14.04 - -- PGP : 29A4CE52 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQI4BAEBCgAiGxxEbyA8eWFuZGVyZXNvbkByaXNldXAubmV0PgUCVvaC

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Process Being Killed on VPS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 This happend before with my 512MB node, when it was set unlimited amount of Mbit/sec. Also swap might help. On February 26, 2016 12:19:44 AM GMT+01:00, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote: >Hello, > >I have a VPS with 512 MB RAM. I run nothing on it except

Re: [tor-relays] CVE-2015-7547

As far as i know anything using glibc is affected, it says on the blog ssh,curl,sudo for examples. On February 17, 2016 6:06:50 PM GMT+01:00, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: >Could someone with a solid understanding of how the Tor daemon >interacts with DNS comment on whether and how CVE-2015