Re: [tor-relays] Operator straw poll: Reasons why you use Tor LTS versions?

.0-RELEASE is fixed, but what they compiled the package against isn’t, so it’s either compile the port or don’t use pkgs. I for one believe in the philosophy of not mixing pkgs and ports so…. Ports it is. Thanks, Conrad signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Operator straw poll: Reasons why you use Tor LTS versions?

mpile Tor against the latest OpenSSL. Example, FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE has OpenSSL 1.1.1a-freebsd, which generates a slight crypto error during the startup of Tor. If you download OpenSSL 1.1.1c and just compile against it, eh, problem fixed. Sorry, maybe I just don’t like seeing errors :).

[tor-relays] Please test bandwidth and resiliency of greyponyitnyc002

intention is to start giving VMs back to the guys on my old infrastructure, and hopefully setup a “Torservers” type arrangement down the road, since this is hosted on unique ASN and addresses. Thanks, Conrad Rock Rockenhaus Greypony IT Consulting (254) 292-3350

Re: [tor-relays] Cherryservers (formerly balticservers) account terminated for exit relay

Actually, Server Room/Primcast will allow you to operate with an unrestricted exit policy if you use their Data Center in Romania of if you want to use a server in the NYC datacenter, you could use one of my IP ranges I have out there. --Conrad -Original Message- From: tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] exit operators: overall DNS failure rate above 5% - please check your DNS resolver

d say this, a friend of mine who previously worked with the US IC says run Unbound or use trusted DNS. Thanks, Conrad Rockenhaus https://www.greyponyit.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@

[tor-relays] Tor Performance on Xen vs KVM

instance running under the Openstack framework. Thanks, Conrad Rockenhaus http://www.greyponyit.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman

[tor-relays] Onionoo and ASN Number/AS Name

-CIX next week. Has anyone seen this type of issue before? Thanks, Conrad smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay says it is reachable, but is not appearing on the network.

Hello, My bust, confirmation bias. Thanks, Conrad On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:45 PM teor wrote: > Hi, > > > On 24 May 2019, at 14:08, Conrad Rockenhaus > wrote: > > > > In April 2018 Google released an update that caused VPNs and Tor > services to stop

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay says it is reachable, but is not appearing on the network.

://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/25804 Thanks, Conrad > On May 23, 2019, at 8:15 PM, teor wrote: > > Hi, > >> On 24 May 2019, at 09:19, Keifer Bly wrote: >> >> Hi all, so this is the tor log since the last restart. It includes the relay >> fingerprint. The tor versi

Re: [tor-relays] new tor middle relay error

the > cached consensus. > Have you done a ps aux | grep tor and determined how many tor processes are running? If you’re running more than one tor process, are they bind to either separate IPs or different ports? Thanks, Conrad smime.p7s Description:

Re: [tor-relays] forward relay connections

dd more latency, just to get to the VM? I wouldn’t consider it feasible. Now that I’m thinking about it, you could try finding a VPN provider that allows Tor and using that VPN provider on your Lime2. -Conrad > > Anyway thanks for your advices > > Il 22/05/19 11:05, nusenu ha scr

Re: [tor-relays] forward relay connections

> On May 22, 2019, at 1:24 AM, tor-re...@riseup.net wrote: > > Hello dear friends > > I'm running a non exit relay on a debian machine (in the next few months I > will switch to *BSD) on a Lime2. I'm running an exit relay too on a remote VM. > > I would turn my non-exit relay in an exit one,

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay problem

> On May 17, 2019, at 6:16 PM, findmei wrote: > > Thank you for replying to my mail. > > Damn it. My isp is blocking me. Is it possible to run this node in some way? > Do you happen to know if you have a transparent proxy in your path to the internet from your box? Run “curl ifconfig.me”

Re: [tor-relays] Well, what exactly are you trying to contribute with your efforts?

g and everything. -- Conrad Rockenhaus https://www.rockenhaus.com Cell: (254) 292-3350 Fax: (254) 875-0459 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Well, what exactly are you trying to contribute with your efforts?

On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 6:05 AM Olaf Grimm wrote: > Conrad, why did you suddenly go underground and not be reachable > anymore? Greypony IT was offline and you were just gone. I was a paying > customer and my two servers were suddenly offline. > > now you come back and promise

Re: [tor-relays] Well, what exactly are you trying to contribute with your efforts?

erstand it, instead of just resorting to talking trash about a project. I just makes it look like you have plenty of free time to mock others because you aren't helping others, but that's my take on things. -- Conrad Rockenhaus https://www.rockenhaus.com Cell: (254) 2

Re: [tor-relays] Anyone interested in running FreeBSD or Linux Exit Relays on AS19624?

Nope, not really. On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 6:57 AM Old Man Tor wrote: > So, did I call it? Or did I call it > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Wednesday, April 17, 2019 11:29 AM, Conrad Rockenhaus < > ad...@rockenhaus.com> wrote: > > For a small donatio

[tor-relays] Anyone interested in running FreeBSD or Linux Exit Relays on AS19624?

to worry about any abuse takedowns. This is the only time I’ll mention it here. If anyone is interested, please email me directly. Thanks, Conrad ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [tor-relays] Making use of new bandwidth

Hello, If Tor doesn't scale on multicore CPUs, setting NumCPUs to 2 and running two threads has no effect at all on throughput? Thanks, Conrad On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 7:02 AM wrote: > > Am 06.04.2019 21:19, schrieb Logforme: > > > The reason I ask is that I wonder if I should r

[tor-relays] FallbackDir

Is their a need for any more FallbackDirs? Thanks, Conrad -- Conrad Rockenhaus https://www.rockenhaus.com Cell: (254) 292-3350 Fax: (254) 875-0459 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin

Re: [tor-relays] High Speed Exit Relay or just a plain Relay?

for AS diversity within the network, given the large amount of relays concentrated in three or four major providers. So, in this AS, traffic is disproportionally low compared to other ASes. I would like your recommendations. Thanks, Conrad On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 1:35 PM grarpamp wrote: > > On

Re: [tor-relays] Hello

walk anymore. > > That said, it has been a GOOD amount of quiet while you've been gone. > > For the love of god/shiva/onions, please don't let these new relays turn into > Conrad and Nathaniel 'Cordially' Suchy's DeadGreyPonyIT show again. My sin was over advertising on the

[tor-relays] High Speed Exit Relay or just a plain Relay?

or just a plain relay? Thanks, Conrad -- Conrad Rockenhaus https://www.rockenhaus.com Cell: (254) 292-3350 Fax: (254) 875-0459 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Emerald Onion's new relays

a second set of IP addresses to my servers in case I want to run another instance of Tor. Would it be more prudent to use that second set of IP addresses as an OutboundBindAddressExit instead and use different ports as a better practice? Thanks, Conrad On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 12:35 PM nusenu wro

[tor-relays] Hello

or just a regular relay. Relay names - greyponyitnyc001 and greyponyitnyc002. I hope everyone is having a good day! -- Conrad Rockenhaus https://www.rockenhaus.com Cell: (254) 292-3350 Fax: (254) 875-0459 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] exit operators: overall DNS failure rate above 5% - please check your DNS

Would you make a recommendation of running unbound on the local exit nodes to resolve local DNS server congestion to get around this issue? Thanks, Conrad > On Oct 19, 2018, at 5:30 PM, nusenu wrote: > > Signed PGP part > Dear Exit relay operators, > > (you are getting

[tor-relays] Thank You

Thank you everyone for the well wishes. I have been discharged from the hospital and I’m recovering slowly at home. I appreciate all of the kind notes that I received and again, thank you. Regards, Conrad signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: [tor-relays] Court Order

ese > relays are useless, they are just not such a big deal to keep reading > about them over and over again. > > Thanks for not understanding it wrong. Well, it came across completely wrong. Conrad signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___

[tor-relays] Court Order

. Oh well. Conrad signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] 4 of Conrad Rockenhaus trial servers are in the top ten exit relays for Canada

; you, I am genuinely interested in learning the > technical pro's and con's relating to this topic. I don’t consider this trolling, but this is the real world. There normally isn’t a huge grand conspiracy and someone’s not out there waiting to melt processors. It’s all fun to discuss

Re: [tor-relays] 4 of Conrad Rockenhaus trial servers are in the top ten exit relays for Canada

to a customer’s server - they don’t have access. I’m actually a little drop in the big bucket But I’ve been trying to promote diversity through the use of other providers. Thanks, Conrad > On Sep 1, 2018, at 6:53 AM, Gary wrote: > > Conrad, > > I have been following this thread and wo

Re: [tor-relays] Policy Question: Tor Exits at Universities, Corporate Networks, etc

I know this is an issue of semantics here, but when you say “Tor Exit in Turkey censoring access to various access to various websites” you’re kind of putting the onus on them directly instead of the repressive anti-free speech regime that they are operating the the exit under. Why not be more

Re: [tor-relays] Lets increase Routing Security for Tor related BGP Prefixes

Here’s OVH’s non-response: Start OVH Thank you for contacting OVH with regards to BGP hijacking; we apologize for the delay in response. From the current status of discussion on the subject, it appears implementing ROA / RPKI is still in development but not a priority; I am afraid at the

Re: [tor-relays] 4 of Conrad Rockenhaus trial servers are in the top ten exit relays for Canada

yahoos? Thanks, Conrad On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:37 PM teor wrote: > Hi Conrad (and staff and operators), > > > On 28 Aug 2018, at 22:16, Conrad Rockenhaus > wrote: > > > >> > >> On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:02 PM, Jordan wrote: > >> >

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-talk] Exit in Turkey blocking torproject (komm EA93C), BadExit, Node Subscription Services, Censorship

there, that’s why during the last uprising they were tagging “8.8.8.8” on the walls. Now they’re doing things a little more sophisticated. Either way, this guy gives us a window to see what is blocked and what isn’t blocked within the Turkish thunderdome. -Conrad > On Aug 30, 2018, at 9:24 PM, Nathan

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

The website is old and has been updated. We are providing up do 100 MiB/s now. Thanks, Conrad > On Aug 28, 2018, at 7:16 AM, livak wrote: > > 10 MiB/s may right for me, but I would try to get > as much bandwidth as I could, up to the 10% of the > consensus weight limit crite

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

- the ports collection is available on each instance. Thanks, Conrad > On Aug 28, 2018, at 7:09 AM, livak wrote: > > Hi Conrad: > > I'm pretty sure I'm taking your offer about the free trial. > > I'm having a question, though: > > I think there are no compiled tor rel

Re: [tor-relays] 4 of Conrad Rockenhaus trial servers are in the top ten exit relays for Canada

d we’re completely hands off unless they need support with something. Our job is to provide the instance and the bandwidth. Thank you, Conrad signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] 4 of Conrad Rockenhaus trial servers are in the top ten exit relays for Canada

the audacity to slander Nathaniel’s and I’s work? Thank you, Have a good day. > On Aug 27, 2018, at 12:59 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > On 27.08.18 19:11, zimmer linux wrote: > >> Well done to Conrad - I say. The more, the merrier. > > I disagree. My personal experience

Re: [tor-relays] Congrats to Nullvoid

> On Aug 26, 2018, at 12:43 PM, grarpamp wrote: > > On 8/26/18, nusenu wrote: >> Conrad Rockenhaus: >>> I just wanted to say congratulations to Nullvoid, who is currently running >>> the second fastest exit in France in my colo in Europe. > >> a

[tor-relays] Congrats to Nullvoid

I just wanted to say congratulations to Nullvoid, who is currently running the second fastest exit in France in my colo in Europe. https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/51420DFB2047A33803A9A6E456D627937DD6E316 Also, go FreeBSD! Thanks, Conrad signature.asc Description: Message

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

couple of people to throw you $10, you throw in a couple of bucks, then bam, done. Easy day, mission accomplished, and not in the Bush way either. Thanks, Conrad signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ tor-relays mailing lis

Re: [tor-relays] Lets increase Routing Security for Tor related BGP Prefixes

OVH Ticket Number 6993458396 created. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

s in developing this idea though, I really do. Don’t consider this me crapping all over your idea, just consider this practical experience from me having the door slammed in my face numerous times while trying to help inner city youth with technology, a noble goal that still resulted in many door

Re: [tor-relays] Yay, Complaints

> On Aug 24, 2018, at 3:50 PM, Dave Warren wrote: > > On 2018-08-23 17:56, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote: >> This mainly seemed to be an issue of miscommunication - I had one party that >> I was in communication with at the beginning who said that this was going to >> b

Re: [tor-relays] Yay, Complaints

hese IPs are reassigned and just emails the upstream, probably because they know they would get more of a reaction that way. Thanks, Conrad signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https

Re: [tor-relays] Yay, Complaints

up and see where things go from there. Thanks, Conrad > On Aug 23, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Franklin Bynum wrote: > > Where is your hardware physically located? If it’s in the United States, I > can probably help you get your stuff back. > > — > Franklin Bynum > Lawyer >

[tor-relays] Yay, Complaints

case of doing everything right and now I’m quite worried that they’ll not only pull the plug, that I’ll have to fight to get my Cisco UCS blade server back (and other assorted equipment) which is totally not going to be cool. Conrad signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

[tor-relays] Interested in running a FreeBSD Relay on Cogent?

costs alone. You don’t have to worry about abuse complaints, I handle that for you. You just worry about running your exit and maintaining your OS. I take care of everything else. If you’re interested, send me a public key. Thanks, Conrad signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: [tor-relays] public relay stats

We’re still getting the archive together, we have a bunch from July to put up still, but we are noticing a trend, of course, of automated DCMAs specifically just for torrented copyrighted works. -- Conrad Rockenhaus Public Key: http://www.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get

Re: [tor-relays] public relay stats

the charts are. Respectfully, Conrad Rockenhaus -- Conrad Rockenhaus Public Key: http://www.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get=0x0F72F2B526DAE93F https://www.rockenhaus.com -- Get started with GreyPony Anonymization Today! https://www.greyponyit.com -Original Message- From: con

Re: [tor-relays] public relay stats

I'm gathering them for all of the Greypony relays...if you're interested in that information, I can give you some charts if you want. I plan to start publishing them soon, we're still revamping our website and just started publishing all of the DCMAs we receive. -- Conrad Rockenhaus Public Key

[tor-relays] Canned Abuse Response

Hello, I'm just curious, does anyone happen to have a canned abuse response that contains the safe harbor provisions of the DCMA? I figured I would ask before I wrote up a really long email. Thanks, Conrad -- Conrad Rockenhaus Fingerprint: 8049 CDBA C385 C451 3348 776D 0F72 F2B5 26DA E93F

[tor-relays] Emails

I'm suddenly without my tor-relays emails and I'm beginning to withdrawal test 1...2...3? Thanks, Conrad -- Conrad Rockenhaus Fingerprint: 8049 CDBA C385 C451 3348 776D 0F72 F2B5 26DA E93F Public Key: https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?op=get=0x0F72F2B526DAE93F https://www.rockenhaus.com

Re: [tor-relays] AS awareness

saturated site. Thanks, Conrad -- Conrad Rockenhaus Fingerprint: 8049 CDBA C385 C451 3348 776D 0F72 F2B5 26DA E93F Public Key: https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?op=get=0x0F72F2B526DAE93F https://www.rockenhaus.com -- Get started with GreyPony Anonymization Today! https://www.greyponyit.com

[tor-relays] Question regarding variables in torrc

just wanted to see if there was an easy fix for simplifying templates for end users. Thanks, Conrad -- Conrad Rockenhaus Fingerprint: 8049 CDBA C385 C451 3348 776D 0F72 F2B5 26DA E93F Public Key: https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?op=get=0x0F72F2B526DAE93F https://www.rockenhaus.com -- Get

Re: [tor-relays] greyponyit.com free trial report

On Friday, July 27, 2018 3:32:28 AM CDT Dmitrii Tcvetkov wrote: > Since 25.07.2018 I'm running Tor exit relay > BBF17F784433635FA28E7E585D05FE3B15A31A6B on FreeBSD VPS. Although > AS16276 is quite crowded, fact that IP address space is SWIPed to Conrad > Rockenhaus means that I, as re

[tor-relays] Expanded Free Trial For Exit Relays

an instance for you. Thanks, Conrad -- Conrad Rockenhaus https://www.rockenhaus.com -- Get started with GreyPony Anonymization Today! https://www.greyponyit.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Discounts/Free Trials on BSD instances to promote BSD relays?

AM Conrad Rockenhaus wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:10 PM, nusenu wrote: > > > > > > Conrad Rockenhaus: > >> 1 vCPU > >> 2 GB RAM > >> 30 GB Disk > >> 10 mbit/Unlimited Traffic > >> > >> I'll adjust the numbers as

Re: [tor-relays] Discounts/Free Trials on BSD instances to promote BSD relays?

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:10 PM, nusenu wrote: > > > Conrad Rockenhaus: >> 1 vCPU >> 2 GB RAM >> 30 GB Disk >> 10 mbit/Unlimited Traffic >> >> I'll adjust the numbers as I assess demand, I just don't want a >> potential high level of interes

Re: [tor-relays] Discounts/Free Trials on BSD instances to promote BSD relays?

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:42 PM, I wrote: > Conrad, > > For diversity I would participate and learn to use BSD to run a relay. > > Robert Robert, You (and anyone else who's interested) is more than welcome to send me an email with an RSA public key, along with your choice

Re: [tor-relays] Discounts/Free Trials on BSD instances to promote BSD relays?

elay through a set of > shell scripts. It's still in development, but just as you do, they run > everything in BSD boxes. > > Cheers! > > [1]: https://emeraldonion.org/introducing-gibson/ > > > > Original Message ---- > > On Jul 19, 2018, 09:34,

Re: [tor-relays] Discounts/Free Trials on BSD instances to promote BSD relays?

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:10 PM, teor wrote: > >> On 19 Jul 2018, at 11:34, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote: >> >> To the point - would it be fair to network stability to offer a week >> long free trial to run a tor instance, well, that is if that's what >> the user h

[tor-relays] Discounts/Free Trials on BSD instances to promote BSD relays?

and all abuse complaints will be coming to me for the address spaces for now on. Thanks, Conrad ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Question regarding ethical torrent blocking

ee Speech" when I was indeed limiting access to something by implementing an exit policy. I forgot that the default policy in itself limits SMTP, and other things and my comfort level increased. -Conrad ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@list

Re: [tor-relays] Question regarding ethical torrent blocking

On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Nagaev Boris wrote: > I think that modern copyright lays violate non aggression principle, > which includes free speech. As I agree, which is why I typically ignored such threats until my provider started enforcing said threats. > Rationale. Skip this

Re: [tor-relays] Question regarding ethical torrent blocking

DPI. Application-level > filtering/firewalls is a good way to get the BadExit flag. Never thought of doing it that way. I do business by the book, what I'm questioning is am I right to call myself a Defender of the Faith by the book or should I try fighting this or what? Thanks, Conrad _

[tor-relays] Question regarding ethical torrent blocking

e Internet and people do torrent legitimate stuff. I don't consider pirating Fallout 4, The Elder Scrolls V, Sweetbitter, and The Evil Within 2 to be protected speech FYI... my worry is just blocking the legitimate uses of bittorrent. Thanks, Conrad Rockenhaus _

Re: [tor-relays] Alternative hoster (Re: DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes)

Hello, In reference to this issue, I am willing to provide an alternative solution that doesn't rely on thge big 3 remaining providers that are over saturated ASNs within the network, however, I would like to gauge how many people would be generally interested in such an endeavor before I go out

Re: [tor-relays] FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS Tor Image

amdisk, that's actually a great idea. I'll put that into what I'm building up right now. Regards, Conrad Rockenhaus 0x424F4C61.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Running a relay at home

Also, once I'm done with the final stage of a project I'm working on,, several of us on this list are going to start working on the reboot of the AWS relay project, which takes advantage of the AWS free tier rules. You could look into running a relay on AWS and making sure your relay only runs wit

Re: [tor-relays] FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS Tor Image

On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 6:46:00 PM CST George wrote: > Vinícius Zavam: > > 2018-02-25 21:23 GMT+00:00 Conrad Rockenhaus <con...@rockenhaus.com>: > >> On Sunday, February 25, 2018 3:05:00 PM CST George wrote: > >>> Conrad Rockenhaus: > >>>>

Re: [tor-relays] FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS Tor Image

On Monday, February 26, 2018 11:24:37 AM CST Vinícius Zavam wrote: > 2018-02-25 21:23 GMT+00:00 Conrad Rockenhaus <con...@rockenhaus.com>: > > On Sunday, February 25, 2018 3:05:00 PM CST George wrote: > > > Conrad Rockenhaus: > > > > Hello All, > > &g

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Setup

would wait at least another day and a half before worrying about this issue because it does take some time for the bandwidth measurements to complete. Please also review: https://blog.torproject.org/lifecycle-new-relay Regards, Conrad On Sunday, February 25, 2018 4:49:00 PM CST Gabe D. wrote

Re: [tor-relays] FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS Tor Image

On Sunday, February 25, 2018 11:13:12 PM CST grarpamp wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:05 PM, George wrote: > > However, I'd be wary of an image that I didn't build myself, personally. > > Yes, especially of image without source [script] > (not to diminish such work). > >

Re: [tor-relays] FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS Tor Image

On Sunday, February 25, 2018 4:03:30 PM CST Jordan wrote: > >> Another issue is that OVH is over relied upon for public nodes. It's the > >> leading ASN with almost 15%. > > > > They're one of the few providers out there that allow exits. That's why > > 15% of our exits are on OVH. > > For what

Re: [tor-relays] FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS Tor Image

a little. Thanks, Conrad On Sunday, February 25, 2018 4:03:00 PM CST George wrote: > Conrad Rockenhaus: > > On Sunday, February 25, 2018 3:05:00 PM CST George wrote: > >> Conrad Rockenhaus: > >>> Hello All, > >>> > >>> If anyone is inte

Re: [tor-relays] FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS Tor Image

018 at 09:05:00PM +, George wrote: > > Conrad Rockenhaus: > > > Hello All, > > > > > > If anyone is interested, I have a RAW image of a FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS image > > > that is fully configured and ready to run Tor. Right now it's an eight > > &g

Re: [tor-relays] FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS Tor Image

On Sunday, February 25, 2018 3:05:00 PM CST George wrote: > Conrad Rockenhaus: > > Hello All, > > > > If anyone is interested, I have a RAW image of a FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS image > > that is fully configured and ready to run Tor. Right now it's an eight GB > >

Re: [tor-relays] FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS Tor Image

stuff. > > regards Steffen > TorGate > torgate(at)linux-hus.dk > OpenGPG 7FD5 65EF A4EF EEF3 7A13 4372 8409 49D6 01A2 0890 > > > Am 25.02.2018 um 21:50 schrieb Conrad Rockenhaus <con...@rockenhaus.com>: > > > > Hello All, > > > > If anyone i

[tor-relays] FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS Tor Image

and unlimited bandwidth). Regards, Conrad Rockenhaus signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Setup

to contact you is associated with that IP address. We give up our anonymity so others may have it. Conrad Rockenhaus (254) 292-3350 On Feb 24, 2018, at 3:03 PM, teor <teor2...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Feb 24 10:45:08.000 [warn] You are running Tor as root. You don't need to, >&

Re: [tor-relays] torservers are not rechable

Ok, I’m sorry but I’m trying to make sense of this,,, You start Tor, and then your server IP changes after a certain uptime, the DNS changes with it. So what’s the issue with accessing it if the DNS changes with it? Do you have to use the IP address explicitly? Thanks, Conrad > On Feb

Re: [tor-relays] Question regarding exit sizing

The 500 Mbps instance would either be one of my private servers in my co-lo, or a dedicated server in one of my private cloud hosting locations. With both contacts, bandwidth costs aren’t an issue, but if one big instance would work I would put it on the same hardware that I am running a server

[tor-relays] Question regarding exit sizing

configuration, etc. I’m just curious, because I”m getting ready to add a few more nodes, but I’m wondering if it’ll be better to go big, or just stay small. Thanks, Conrad Rockenhaus ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https

[tor-relays] Exit Relay Up

Hello All, I just brought up my third relay, ConradsOVHRelay03, as an exit. I appreciate the feedback that everyone provided me with before and I hope that this relay is configured perfectly. I’m glad to add more bandwidth to the cause. Thanks, Conrad

[tor-relays] What's the priority right now?

I’m ready to get node #3 up right now…so what’s the priority for high speed nodes right now, exits or relays? Just wanted to know before I brought it online. This one is based in the great land of Canada :D. Thanks, Conrad ___ tor-relays mailing

[tor-relays] Question about downtime

be acceptable? I would like to avoid downtime personally, as they’re stable, fast relays. I’m just looking for thoughts and ideas. Thanks, Conrad ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [tor-relays] first impression with 0.3.2.8-rcant a fast exit relay

I just brought a 0.3.2.8 relay online at OVH, ConradsOVHRelay, A5C6D2EBCCA77D0B09364DD6B75FEC817AF977FA. For some reason Atlas says the bandwidth is 0, but I have it set to 625. I guess we’ll see how it does later. Conrad > On Dec 22, 2017, at 8:48 AM, David Goulet <dgou...@torproje

Re: [tor-relays] IPv6 Issue with Relay

Thank you. It’s always the small things, huh? :D Conrad > On Dec 21, 2017, at 6:12 PM, teor <teor2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 22 Dec 2017, at 09:13, Conrad Rockenhaus <con...@rockenhaus.com> wrote: >> >>>> I’ve confirmed that the following

Re: [tor-relays] IPv6 Issue with Relay

On Dec 21, 2017, at 3:01 AM, teor <teor2...@gmail.com> wrote:On 21 Dec 2017, at 16:33, Conrad Rockenhaus <con...@rockenhaus.com> wrote:Hello,One of the relays that I brought online yesterday, ConradsAWSExit (Hash 1B47E33F9D422CC97BD2DDA1F082BFF2FC58E79A) is showing up on Atlas t

[tor-relays] IPv6 Issue with Relay

be appreciated. Thanks, Conrad ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

advise! I also appreciate the input regarding the revitalization of the Cloud project again. Another person has also volunteered to assist in the project so hopefully things should start moving here pretty soon! Thanks, Conrad > On Dec 19, 2017, at 9:02 PM, Conrad Rockenhaus &

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

> On Dec 19, 2017, at 8:55 PM, teor <teor2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 20 Dec 2017, at 13:28, Conrad Rockenhaus <con...@rockenhaus.com > <mailto:con...@rockenhaus.com>> wrote: > >> Howdy, >> >> Early this morning (3 AM CST) I brought

[tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

for rolling out tor. Thanks, Conrad Rockenhaus ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Relay / Bridge

to volunteer to try to help out, if there's a willingness to expand it to other providers? Thanks. --Rock On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Conrad Rockenhaus con...@rockenhaus.com wrote: I apologize for the delay in responding, getting ready to move to Texas, but anyway. My original intention was to run

Re: [tor-relays] Relay / Bridge

/listinfo/tor-relays -- Conrad Rockenhaus http://www.rockenhaus.com/ http://www.lagparty.org/~conradr/ ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Newly configured relay questions

, 2013 at 02:22:55PM -0500, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote: I brought a new non-exit relay online: ec2bridgerocks001 D06C B145 56C1 F73A F317 B555 C279 2F7B 105C 95B4 It's been operational for 6 days now, Tor has been reporting bandwidth usage, but when I try to look for it in the TorStatus page, it's

[tor-relays] Localized TOR exit notices?

idea? Or did I just not find it? Cheers and thanks for any hints, Conrad [1] https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/blob/HEAD:/contrib/tor-exit-notice.html [2] http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tmg/index.html (in german) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature