Re: [tor-relays] 2017-06-07 15:37: 65 new tor exits in 30 minutes

2017-06-08 Thread nusenu
Roger Dingledine: > we have a plausible guess about where they came from, > and we contacted the company that we think controls the IP addresses, so > they can figure it out / clean up as needed. Interesting. I'm curious, how did you link the IP addresses to the company? Is your guess that the

Re: [tor-relays] 2017-06-07 15:37: 65 new tor exits in 30 minutes

2017-06-07 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 03:50:54PM -0400, David Goulet wrote: > On 07 Jun (19:41:00), nusenu wrote: > > DocTor [1] made me look into this. > > > > _All_ 65 relays in the following table have the following characteristics: > > (not shown in the table to safe some space) > > Yah, we got a report

Re: [tor-relays] 2017-06-07 15:37: 65 new tor exits in 30 minutes

2017-06-07 Thread David Goulet
On 07 Jun (19:41:00), nusenu wrote: > DocTor [1] made me look into this. > > _All_ 65 relays in the following table have the following characteristics: > (not shown in the table to safe some space) Yah, we got a report on bad-relays@ as well... We are looking into this but seems there is a

[tor-relays] 2017-06-07 15:37: 65 new tor exits in 30 minutes

2017-06-07 Thread nusenu
DocTor [1] made me look into this. _All_ 65 relays in the following table have the following characteristics: (not shown in the table to safe some space) - OS: Linux - run two instances per IP address (the number of relays is only odd because in one case they created 3 keys per IP) - ORPort: