Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

B L: > which linux is long term tor supported? Several members of the Tor project are also Debian developers. Debian Wheezy has been released last week-end and should be supported for the next 2-3 years. I hope that answers your question. -- Lunar

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

Please which linux is long term tor supported? Thank You On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Jack Zielke wrote: > Lunar writes: > > > > > Ubuntu Lucid can't be supported through Debian packages. > > See for details. > > > > Ticket 8714 has be

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

Lunar writes: > > Ubuntu Lucid can't be supported through Debian packages. > See for details. > Ticket 8714 has been updated with directions for lucid users. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-rel

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

Lutz Horn: > Am 16.04.2013 um 18:52 schrieb George Kadianakis: > > Ubuntu check out these instructiosn: > > https://www.torproject.org/projects/obfsproxy-debian-instructions.html.en > > I am trying to install obfsproxy on Ubuntu lucid. Sadly, using these apt lines > > > deb http://deb.torproject.

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

Hi, Am 21.04.2013 um 14:54 schrieb Roman Mamedov: > Did you do "apt-get update" before trying 'search'? This is what I do: $ sudo grep tor /etc/apt/sources.list deb http://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org lucid main deb http://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org experimental-lucid main $ sudo a

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 14:46:28 +0200 Lutz Horn wrote: > Hi, > > Am 16.04.2013 um 18:52 schrieb George Kadianakis: > > Ubuntu check out these instructiosn: > > https://www.torproject.org/projects/obfsproxy-debian-instructions.html.en > > I am trying to install obfsproxy on Ubuntu lucid. Sadly, usi

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

Hi, Am 16.04.2013 um 18:52 schrieb George Kadianakis: > Ubuntu check out these instructiosn: > https://www.torproject.org/projects/obfsproxy-debian-instructions.html.en I am trying to install obfsproxy on Ubuntu lucid. Sadly, using these apt lines > deb http://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org l

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 10:23:06 +, Moritz Bartl wrote: > On 19.04.2013 20:59, Andreas Krey wrote: > > And a long download later I learned that the obfsproxy bundle > > doesn't work on this old XP (just the obfsproxy plugin, actually, > > the browser itself does). > > Oh? How come? Can you please

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

On 19.04.2013 20:59, Andreas Krey wrote: > And a long download later I learned that the obfsproxy bundle > doesn't work on this old XP (just the obfsproxy plugin, actually, > the browser itself does). Oh? How come? Can you please file a ticket about it and provide details? -- Moritz Bartl https

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

George Kadianakis writes: > Looking into BridgeDB, we have 200 obfs2 bridges, but only 40 obfs3 > bridges: this means that we need more people running the new Python > obfsproxy! Upgrading obfsproxy should be easy now, since we prepared > new instructions and Debian/Ubuntu packages. If you run Deb

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

Andreas Krey: > On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:50:48 +, Lunar wrote: > > Drake Wilson: > > > - bypass declared installation requirements, use 2.6.6, and blindly > > > hope that it won't result in some awful subtle bug; > > > > obfsproxy works on Debian Squeeze which bears 2.6.6. I had to patch t

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:07:43 +, Andreas Krey wrote: ... > > So, one more obfs3 bridge (apparently, no client at hand yet) up. And a long download later I learned that the obfsproxy bundle doesn't work on this old XP (just the obfsproxy plugin, actually, the browser itself does). :-( So, no fu

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:49:12 +, Martin Weinelt wrote: ... > A missing Python.h is probably contained in your python2.6-dev > package. Ah, thanks. Now caching 'Python.h => python-dev' relation. So, one more obfs3 bridge (apparently, no client at hand yet) up. Andreas -- "Totally trivial. Fa

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 19.04.2013 19:48, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:50:48 +, Lunar wrote: >> Drake Wilson: >>> - bypass declared installation requirements, use 2.6.6, and >>> blindly hope that it won't result in some awful subtle bug; >> >> obfsprox

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:50:48 +, Lunar wrote: > Drake Wilson: > > - bypass declared installation requirements, use 2.6.6, and blindly > > hope that it won't result in some awful subtle bug; > > obfsproxy works on Debian Squeeze which bears 2.6.6. I had to patch the Mind to provide any mo

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

Drake Wilson: > - bypass declared installation requirements, use 2.6.6, and blindly > hope that it won't result in some awful subtle bug; obfsproxy works on Debian Squeeze which bears 2.6.6. I had to patch the test suites but that was all:

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

Quoth Steve Snyder , on 2013-04-16 15:53:14 -0400: > obfs3 won't build/run on RHEL6/CentOS6 due to the Python 2.7.x (plus > many, many subpackages) requirement. Replacing the installed Python > v2.6.x will break your system. Installing to an alternate location > (download, ./configure, make altin

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

On 16.04.2013 22:49, Martin Weinelt wrote: > Does it make sense to launch an Obfsproxy on a IP already running a > relay node? That is a fine question. Some countries currently seem to block relays by IP:Port combination, so the rest of the ports could be still reachable. In theory, it should wor

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:52 PM, George Kadianakis wrote: > Looking into BridgeDB, we have 200 obfs2 bridges, but only 40 obfs3 > bridges: this means that we need more people running the new Python > obfsproxy! Upgrading obfsproxy should be easy now, since we prepared > new instructions and Debian

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 16.04.2013 22:37, Moritz Bartl wrote: > On 16.04.2013 22:27, Roman Mamedov wrote: >>> Also, obfsproxy was rewritten in Python and it now supports a >>> new pluggable transport called 'obfs3' which works even in >>> China [2]. >> I wish this sort of

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

On 16.04.2013 22:27, Roman Mamedov wrote: >> Also, obfsproxy was rewritten in Python and it now supports a new >> pluggable transport called 'obfs3' which works even in China [2]. > I wish this sort of functionality was integrated directly into tor. > I am not up for installing and configuring an e

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:52:19 +0300 George Kadianakis wrote: > Also, obfsproxy was rewritten in Python and it now supports a new > pluggable transport called 'obfs3' which works even in China [2]. We > have dropped support for the C-version of Obfsproxy, and the new > Pluggable Transport Bundles c

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

Steve Snyder: > obfs3 won't build/run on RHEL6/CentOS6 due to the Python 2.7.x (plus > many, many subpackages) requirement. That's a pity: obfsproxy can actually run with Python 2.6 as I've happily discovered when doing packages for Debian Squeeze. I hope George will be able to lower the requiere

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

On Tuesday, April 16, 2013 12:52pm, "George Kadianakis" said: [snip] > Looking into BridgeDB, we have 200 obfs2 bridges, but only 40 obfs3 > bridges: this means that we need more people running the new Python > obfsproxy! Upgrading obfsproxy should be easy now, since we prepared > new instruction

Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

I would love to help. My questions, does it make any sense to run a bridge from a residential internet that changes its IP 2-3 times a day? My server is running constantly, however my provider "likes" disconnects and as a result my IP changes. > Greetings, > > A year ago we asked you to run obf

[tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

Greetings, A year ago we asked you to run obfuscated bridges to help people in Iran [0]. Many people answered our call and we ended up having a big pool of obfuscated bridges to give to our users. Unfortunately, today, most of those bridges are down, and fresh ones are needed more than ever, sinc