Re: [tor-relays] Authorities: what is up?

2012-01-13 Thread Klaus Layer
Sebastian Hahn wrote on 13.01.2012: > Yes, until a few days ago ides was - when it was online - voting along > with the other dirauths. Now that the other dirauths upgraded, ides is > left out and the warning happens. We might want to silence the warning, > as we don't warn when a dirauth is total

Re: [tor-relays] Authorities: what is up?

2012-01-13 Thread Sebastian Hahn
On Jan 13, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Klaus Layer wrote: > Sebastian Hahn wrote on 13.01.2012: > >> >> Ah, I see. ides not having a current consensus is different from ides >> being down. Ides still is running the stable Tor version and needs to be >> upgraded to 0.2.3.x to be allowed to vote along wit

Re: [tor-relays] Authorities: what is up?

2012-01-13 Thread Klaus Layer
Sebastian Hahn wrote on 13.01.2012: > > Ah, I see. ides not having a current consensus is different from ides > being down. Ides still is running the stable Tor version and needs to be > upgraded to 0.2.3.x to be allowed to vote along with the other dirauths, > so it doesn't immediately know abo

Re: [tor-relays] Authorities: what is up?

2012-01-13 Thread Sebastian Hahn
On Jan 13, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Nils Vogels wrote: > Hey Sebastian, Roger, > On 13/01/2012, Sebastian Hahn wrote: >> >> Ah, I see. ides not having a current consensus is different from ides >> being down. Ides still is running the stable Tor version and needs to be >> upgraded to 0.2.3.x to be allo

Re: [tor-relays] Authorities: what is up?

2012-01-13 Thread Sebastian Hahn
On Jan 13, 2012, at 1:40 PM, Andrew Lewis wrote: > Because alpha tends to be pretty stable with tor, and the latest security > fixes are in alpha a lot sooner. > > On Jan 13, 2012, at 12:21 PM, Steve Snyder wrote: >> On 01/13/2012 05:27 AM, Sebastian Hahn wrote: >>> Ah, I see. ides not having

Re: [tor-relays] Authorities: what is up?

2012-01-13 Thread Andrew Lewis
Because alpha tends to be pretty stable with tor, and the latest security fixes are in alpha a lot sooner. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 13, 2012, at 12:21 PM, Steve Snyder wrote: > On 01/13/2012 05:27 AM, Sebastian Hahn wrote: >> Ah, I see. ides not having a current consensus is different from

Re: [tor-relays] Authorities: what is up?

2012-01-13 Thread Steve Snyder
On 01/13/2012 05:27 AM, Sebastian Hahn wrote: Ah, I see. ides not having a current consensus is different from ides being down. Ides still is running the stable Tor version and needs to be upgraded to 0.2.3.x to be allowed to vote along with the other dirauths, so it doesn't immediately know abou

Re: [tor-relays] Authorities: what is up?

2012-01-13 Thread Sebastian Hahn
On Jan 13, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Klaus Layer wrote: > Sebastian Hahn wrote on 13.01.2012: >> >> We've had quite a bit of trouble making a consensus in the past few >> days, tho these issues have been resolved as of two days ago or so. >> There were quite a few maintenance issues with the dirauths,

Re: [tor-relays] Authorities: what is up?

2012-01-13 Thread Klaus Layer
Sebastian Hahn wrote on 13.01.2012: > > We've had quite a bit of trouble making a consensus in the past few > days, tho these issues have been resolved as of two days ago or so. > There were quite a few maintenance issues with the dirauths, and not all > have been resolved yet, but a large enough

Re: [tor-relays] Authorities: what is up?

2012-01-13 Thread Sebastian Hahn
On Jan 13, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Klaus Layer wrote: > Hi, > > just because I am curious: can someone from the tor authority > operators please explain what is going on the last days with > tor authorities. This morning (europe) ides is not available. > > Thanks, > > Klaus We've had quite a bit

[tor-relays] Authorities: what is up?

2012-01-13 Thread Klaus Layer
Hi, just because I am curious: can someone from the tor authority operators please explain what is going on the last days with tor authorities. This morning (europe) ides is not available. Thanks, Klaus signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___