Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

2021-03-04 Thread torjoy
Thanks for all your answers guys! Now i know that i'm doeing good running bridges in different iat modes. Actually I'm running 4 bridges, and two have iat_mode set to 0 and two others set to 1 and 2 respectively. I also have a question about bridges speed. It seems that when I do use of my

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

2021-03-01 Thread William Kane
If you run more than three bridges, run an even distribution of bridges with iat_mode set to 0, 1 and 2, if you run only three bridges, one with each setting, if two, then 0 and 2, if only one, run it with 2 due to the lack of bridges supporting it, et cetera. That's how I would handle it.. -

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

2021-02-26 Thread Anonforpeace
So should I remove that instruction from torrc? Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On Feb 25, 2021, 4:14 PM, Philipp Winter wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 06:30:35PM +0100, Toralf Förster wrote: >> SO why is this not the default? > > The feature introduces a

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

2021-02-26 Thread torjoy
Hi William, You can do it by setting: ServerTransportOptions obfs4 iat-mode=2 at your bridge's side. Best regards, Luiz Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ Em quinta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2021 às 05:16, Toralf Förster escreveu: > On 2/24/21 9:34 PM,

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

2021-02-26 Thread Philipp Winter
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 06:30:35PM +0100, Toralf Förster wrote: > SO why is this not the default? The feature introduces a substantial performance penalty for a dubious and poorly understood privacy gain. If I were to write an algorithm to detect obfs4, I wouldn't bother dealing with its flow

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

2021-02-25 Thread Anonforpeace
I just added that feature to my bridge today! That line of code should be on the tor site so that bridge runners can automatically add it to their torrc files. Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On Feb 25, 2021, 12:30 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 2/24/21 9:34 PM,

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

2021-02-25 Thread Toralf Förster
On 2/25/21 6:32 PM, niftybunny wrote: And why did I read about this the first time in a mailing list? +1 -- Toralf ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

2021-02-25 Thread niftybunny
> On 25. Feb 2021, at 18:30, Toralf Förster wrote: > > On 2/24/21 9:34 PM, William Kane wrote: >> Thank you for running obfs4 bridges with iat_mode != 0, only very few >> obfs4 bridges support the additional traffic obfuscation in both >> directions. > SO why is this not the default? And why

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

2021-02-25 Thread Toralf Förster
On 2/24/21 9:34 PM, William Kane wrote: Thank you for running obfs4 bridges with iat_mode != 0, only very few obfs4 bridges support the additional traffic obfuscation in both directions. SO why is this not the default? -- Toralf ___ tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

2021-02-25 Thread Dmitrii Tcvetkov
"ServerTransportOptions obfs4 iat-mode=2" in torrc On February 25, 2021 11:16:52 AM GMT+03:00, "Toralf Förster" wrote: >On 2/24/21 9:34 PM, William Kane wrote: >> Thank you for running obfs4 bridges with iat_mode != 0, only very few >> obfs4 bridges support the additional traffic obfuscation

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

2021-02-25 Thread Eddie
On 2/24/2021 12:34 PM, William Kane wrote: Thank you for running obfs4 bridges with iat_mode != 0, only very few obfs4 bridges support the additional traffic obfuscation in both directions. Kudos to you my friend. - William Should I take this as a recommendation to update my bridges to support

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

2021-02-25 Thread Toralf Förster
On 2/24/21 9:34 PM, William Kane wrote: Thank you for running obfs4 bridges with iat_mode != 0, only very few obfs4 bridges support the additional traffic obfuscation in both directions. At my client I have iat_mode=2 set but I do wonder how to set that as default at a bridge? -- Toralf

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

2021-02-24 Thread William Kane
Thank you for running obfs4 bridges with iat_mode != 0, only very few obfs4 bridges support the additional traffic obfuscation in both directions. Kudos to you my friend. - William 2021-02-23 1:18 GMT, torjoy : > Hi All, > > I work with time and frequency references and run some tor bridges.

[tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

2021-02-24 Thread torjoy
Hi All, I work with time and frequency references and run some tor bridges. What is the objective of "iat_mode" setting? Is an good timming reference important for this setting? For now, i'm adminstrating 3 briges, one with iat_mode=0, iat_mode=1 and iat_mode=2. Could you explain or forward me

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

2021-02-24 Thread Felix
Hi Luiz Am 23.02.2021 um 02:18 schrieb torjoy: I work with time and frequency references and run some tor bridges. What is the objective of "iat_mode" setting? Is an good timming reference important for this setting? For now, i'm adminstrating 3 briges, one with iat_mode=0, iat_mode=1 and