Re: [tor-relays] Can bridge run in tiny VPS

2012-02-14 Thread krugar
On 02/14/2012 02:42 AM, tor-rel...@nickcoleman.org wrote: Bandwidth is 500GB up and down per month. Tor can have half of this (note the up *and* down). excerpt of config from my torrc (running 0.2.2.35): RelayBandwidthRate 150 KBytes RelayBandwidthBurst 300 KBytes ExitPolicy reject *:*

Re: [tor-relays] Can bridge run in tiny VPS

2012-02-14 Thread mick
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:46:22 +0100 krugar tor-ad...@krugar.de allegedly wrote: On 02/14/2012 02:42 AM, tor-rel...@nickcoleman.org wrote: Bandwidth is 500GB up and down per month. Tor can have half of this (note the up *and* down). excerpt of config from my torrc (running 0.2.2.35):

Re: [tor-relays] Can bridge run in tiny VPS

2012-02-14 Thread Tycho Andersen
Hi Fabio, On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:47:06AM +0100, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote: I've been running a Tor Relay doing 15Mbit/s on chvps.com with 128MB of ram. Plenty of kernel messages saying Hey man, put some more RAM but i just ignored them, added file based a +256mb of swap, and the

[tor-relays] Can bridge run in tiny VPS

2012-02-13 Thread tor-relays
After reading on Hacker News about Tor's request for bridges for Syria and Iran, I thought perhaps I could use my el-cheapo VPS for this. I use it to run an anonymous forwarding proxy for my own use. It gets very little use, so I can do without the proxy for a few months. Mem is limited to

Re: [tor-relays] Can bridge run in tiny VPS

2012-02-13 Thread Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
I've been running a Tor Relay doing 15Mbit/s on chvps.com with 128MB of ram. Plenty of kernel messages saying Hey man, put some more RAM but i just ignored them, added file based a +256mb of swap, and the machine has been running fine for some more than 1 month. This doesn't means it's the