Re: [tor-relays] Darknet Shenanigans [was: suspicious "Relay127001" relays]

2016-07-06 Thread Yawning Angel
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 07:29:04 +0200 Andreas Krey wrote: > On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 15:06:00 +, grarpamp wrote: > ... > > https://boingboing.net/2016/07/01/researchers-find-over-100-spyi.html > > Is there a way to make tor log connection attempts to any ports > on an hidden service address, indepe

Re: [tor-relays] Darknet Shenanigans [was: suspicious "Relay127001" relays]

2016-07-06 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 7 Jul 2016, at 15:29, Andreas Krey wrote: > > On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 15:06:00 +, grarpamp wrote: > ... >> https://boingboing.net/2016/07/01/researchers-find-over-100-spyi.html > > Is there a way to make tor log connection attempts to any ports > on an hidden service address, independent o

Re: [tor-relays] Darknet Shenanigans [was: suspicious "Relay127001" relays]

2016-07-06 Thread Andreas Krey
On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 15:06:00 +, grarpamp wrote: ... > https://boingboing.net/2016/07/01/researchers-find-over-100-spyi.html Is there a way to make tor log connection attempts to any ports on an hidden service address, independent of whether the port actually has a HiddenServicePort? > All qui

[tor-relays] Darknet Shenanigans [was: suspicious "Relay127001" relays]

2016-07-06 Thread grarpamp
On 7/6/16, Roger Dingledine wrote: > In this > case we actually found these relays misbehaving (accessing onion https://boingboing.net/2016/07/01/researchers-find-over-100-spyi.html http://motherboard.vice.com/read/over-100-snooping-tor-nodes-have-been-spying-on-dark-web-sites https://www.defcon.