Re: [tor-relays] Disappointing AUP - (was Re: DDOS?)

2013-01-05 Thread Moritz Bartl
On 04.01.2013 21:38, mick wrote: Thanks for the pointer - but yes, I'd prefer to stay away from the US. I think the US is probably already well served with tor nodes. If we did not run too many exits already, I would go for a Hong Kong server with Limehost:

Re: [tor-relays] Disappointing AUP - (was Re: DDOS?)

2013-01-05 Thread mick
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 11:40:42 +0100 Moritz Bartl mor...@torservers.net allegedly wrote: If we did not run too many exits already, I would go for a Hong Kong server with Limehost: http://www.limehost.ro/servere/dedicated-models.html We have one of their older offers, dedi Gbit for 110 Euro in

Re: [tor-relays] Disappointing AUP - (was Re: DDOS?)

2013-01-04 Thread Steve Snyder
On Friday, January 4, 2013 3:38pm, mick m...@rlogin.net said: [snip] Thanks for the pointer - but yes, I'd prefer to stay away from the US. I think the US is probably already well served with tor nodes. Yes, about 25% of all Tor nodes worldwide are in the US; Germany is in 2nd place with 17%.

Re: [tor-relays] Disappointing AUP - (was Re: DDOS?)

2013-01-04 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 03:51:21PM -0500, Steve Snyder wrote: On Friday, January 4, 2013 3:38pm, mick m...@rlogin.net said: [snip] Thanks for the pointer - but yes, I'd prefer to stay away from the US. I think the US is probably already well served with tor nodes. Yes, about 25% of all

Re: [tor-relays] Disappointing AUP - (was Re: DDOS?)

2013-01-04 Thread Steve Snyder
On Friday, January 4, 2013 3:54pm, Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu said: On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 03:51:21PM -0500, Steve Snyder wrote: On Friday, January 4, 2013 3:38pm, mick m...@rlogin.net said: [snip] Thanks for the pointer - but yes, I'd prefer to stay away from the US. I think the US

Re: [tor-relays] Disappointing AUP - (was Re: DDOS?)

2013-01-01 Thread josh
Are you only seeking providers outside of the U.S.? I've been using PhoenixNAP for the last two years and am very happy with their services. It's a dedicated server provider located in the United States, but they are still very affordable. I've contacted them in the past about running a TOR

[tor-relays] Disappointing AUP - (was Re: DDOS?)

2012-12-31 Thread mick
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:33:45 + mick m...@rlogin.net allegedly wrote: Ho Hum. Time to look for another provider. And in looking at alternatives I found this http://stormvz.com/terms.html on one site. The fourth prohibited usage item, lumps Tor in with Phishing Sites and Proxy Scanners.

Re: [tor-relays] Disappointing AUP - (was Re: DDOS?)

2012-12-31 Thread Daniel Case
This might be a bit of a shameless plug, but I used to use bitfolk ( bitfolk.com) - they have a generous allowance of bandwidth and allow tor as long as you set it up correctly. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-relays] Disappointing AUP - (was Re: DDOS?)

2012-12-31 Thread mick
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:03:46 + Daniel Case danielcas...@gmail.com allegedly wrote: This might be a bit of a shameless plug, but I used to use bitfolk ( bitfolk.com) - they have a generous allowance of bandwidth and allow tor as long as you set it up correctly. Daniel I looked at bitfolk