Re: [tor-relays] Dropped off consensus (0.4.4.5) - reason is Libressl 3.2.1 - 3.4.1 seems ok

2021-10-23 Thread Toralf Förster
On 10/23/21 12:41 AM, Felix wrote: Toralf, it would be super nice if you could check on your end, or somebody else can confirm? Hi, we here in Gentoo decided to stop supporting LibreSSL, so I cannot tell you if it would work here or not. -- Toralf

Re: [tor-relays] Dropped off consensus (0.4.4.5) - reason is Libressl 3.2.1 - 3.4.1 seems ok

2021-10-23 Thread George
On 10/22/21 18:41, Felix wrote: Hi All Libressl 3.4.1 (devel) seems to run for us. I don't have the exact commit(s), but this LibreSSL issue was fixed many months ago in OpenBSD snapshots, which everyone is now seeing with the more recent LibreSSL releases and the release of OpenBSD 7.0 a

Re: [tor-relays] Dropped off consensus (0.4.4.5) - reason is Libressl 3.2.1 - 3.4.1 seems ok

2021-10-22 Thread Felix
Hi All Libressl 3.4.1 (devel) seems to run for us. Oct 22 21:06:26.894 [notice] Tor 0.4.6.7 running on FreeBSD with Libevent 2.1.12-stable, OpenSSL LibreSSL 3.4.1, Zlib 1.2.11, Liblzma 5.2.5, Libzstd 1.5.0 and Unknown N/A as libc. Am 20.09.2020 um 14:32 schrieb Toralf Förster: On 9/20/20

Re: [tor-relays] Dropped off consensus (0.4.4.5) - reason is Libressl 3.2.1

2020-09-28 Thread Fran
Hey, following up on my still persisting openbsd issue (https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2020-July/018717.html) I reckon this might also a libressl issue. I did as Roger suggested and set "usebridges 1 bridge ip:orport" > Tor[17665]: connection_or_init_conn_from_address():

Re: [tor-relays] Dropped off consensus (0.4.4.5) - reason is Libressl 3.2.1

2020-09-20 Thread Toralf Förster
On 9/20/20 12:57 PM, Felix wrote: > > Please somebody can _confirm_ this thing? Much more worse: The relay here under a hardened Gentoo Linux with LibreSSL 3.2.1 has only 50% of the amount of the conenctions as with 3.2.0 at all - and the TCP traffic dropped down by nearly 100%. I recompiled

Re: [tor-relays] Dropped off consensus (0.4.4.5) - reason is Libressl 3.2.1

2020-09-20 Thread Toralf Förster
On 9/20/20 12:57 PM, Felix wrote: >> > Libressl 321 is not compatible to what is needed to make the authorities > tor26, dizum, gabel., maatu. and longc. happy (let them not grant a > "Running"). What can that be? Just upgraded here 2 tor-0.4.5.0 (Gentoo Linux, same ip) from 3.2.0 to 3.2.1 Will

Re: [tor-relays] Dropped off consensus (0.4.4.5) - reason is Libressl 3.2.1

2020-09-20 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 12:57:46PM +0200, Felix wrote: > Libressl 321 is not compatible to what is needed to make the authorities > tor26, dizum, gabel., maatu. and longc. happy (let them not grant a > "Running"). What can that be? > > Please somebody can _confirm_ this thing? You're not crazy.

Re: [tor-relays] Dropped off consensus (0.4.4.5) - reason is Libressl 3.2.1

2020-09-20 Thread Felix
Hi everybody Sep 18 21:00:22.384 [notice] Tor 0.4.4.5 running on FreeBSD with Libevent 2.1.12-stable, OpenSSL LibreSSL 3.2.1, Zlib 1.2.11, Liblzma 5.2.4, and Libzstd 1.4.5. moria1 Fast Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=566 tor26 Fast Guard Stab V2Dir Valid dizum Fast Guard Stab