On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> ... that's .. odd.
>
> Let's poke the freebsd crypto and network stack people and ask. I
> can't imagine why this is a problem anymore and we should default to
> it being on.
I don't think there's a crypto@ list, though security@ might repres
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Philipp Winter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 04:04:41AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
>> 173 FreeBSD
>
> FreeBSD still seems to use globally incrementing IP IDs by default.
> That's an issue as it leaks fine-grained information about how many
> packets a relay's networ
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 04:04:41AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
> 173 FreeBSD
FreeBSD still seems to use globally incrementing IP IDs by default.
That's an issue as it leaks fine-grained information about how many
packets a relay's networking stack processes. (However, nobody
investigated the exact im
