Moritz Bartl wrote:
> On 06.01.2013 20:29, tor-admin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 January 2013 13:34:27 Fabian Keil wrote:
> >> While I was living in Overath I "registered" my relays with the
> >> Police in Rösrath (who always acted very professionally and respectful).
> > Good point. I never thoug
Moritz Bartl wrote:
> On 06.01.2013 20:20, tor-admin wrote:
> > If yes the law is pretty clear in § 6 that such a
> > service has to be registered at the Bundesnetzagentur if it is done
> > commercially.
>
> The second part of your sentence here is fundamentally wrong.
>
> In general, when G
On 06.01.2013 21:01, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>>> Whereas service providers are bound to the Telemediengesetz:
>>> http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tmg/
>>> Most interesting for exit operators within German borders are:
>>> §8 - no liability for forwarded content (compare §512a DMCA USA)
> Don't forget
On 06.01.2013 20:29, tor-admin wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 January 2013 13:34:27 Fabian Keil wrote:
>> While I was living in Overath I "registered" my relays with the
>> Police in Rösrath (who always acted very professionally and respectful).
> Good point. I never thought about pro actively informing
On 06.01.2013 20:20, tor-admin wrote:
>> Access Providers are bound to the Telekommunikationsgesetz:
>> http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tkg_2004/
> Reading the law it is still unclear to me if a Tor node operator is a
> "Diensteanbieter" (service provider) as defined by the
> Telekommunikations
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 08:20:44PM +0100, tor-admin wrote:
> > Whereas service providers are bound to the Telemediengesetz:
> > http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tmg/
> >
> > Most interesting for exit operators within German borders are:
> > §8 - no liability for forwarded content (compare §512a
On Sunday 06 January 2013 20:35:25 Markus Drenger wrote:
> the guys from opentracker told us at 24c3 that they have made good
> experiences with informing their upstream provider about their
> activities. that way their provider forwarded all abuse-mails directly
> to them.
>
> events.ccc.de/congr
the guys from opentracker told us at 24c3 that they have made good
experiences with informing their upstream provider about their
activities. that way their provider forwarded all abuse-mails directly
to them.
events.ccc.de/congress/2007/Fahrplan/events/2355.en.html
this might help with tor-nodes
On Wednesday 02 January 2013 13:34:27 Fabian Keil wrote:
> While I was living in Overath I "registered" my relays with the
> Police in Rösrath (who always acted very professionally and respectful).
Good point. I never thought about pro actively informing the local police
about my nodes. Will check
On Wednesday 02 January 2013 14:56:59 Moritz Bartl wrote:
> There is a fundamental legal difference between operating Internet
> Access Providers and Internet Service Providers. As a Tor exit, you
> should and want to be judged as a service provider. The key difference
> is that Access Providers gi
On 01.01.2013 22:30, tor-admin wrote:
> He gave the advice to register open WIFIs which are operated by non-profits
> at
> the German Bundesnetzagentur, because this is required under German law for
> companies (http://is.gd/vcz2pZ). I am wondering if there are Tor nodes
> operated by Germans w
tor-admin wrote:
> this is a question more specific for the German jurisdiction. At the 29C3 in
> Hamburg I attended a interesting talk about open WIFI (http://is.gd/9G8AVA
> unfortunately in German) who was given by Reto Mantz
> (http://www.offenenetze.de/).
>
> He gave the advice to regist
Hi,
this is a question more specific for the German jurisdiction. At the 29C3 in
Hamburg I attended a interesting talk about open WIFI (http://is.gd/9G8AVA
unfortunately in German) who was given by Reto Mantz
(http://www.offenenetze.de/).
He gave the advice to register open WIFIs which are op
13 matches
Mail list logo
