Dear list members,
Sorry for the completely empty mail a few minutes ago. What can i say, it's
sunday and i had way less sleep than i should.
But here the good news. The live scoreboard was modified. There is now a
new column which shows the number of completed runs per IP and also at the
On Sunday 26 January 2014 12:48:34 Sebastian Urbach wrote:
But here the good news. The live scoreboard was modified. There is now a
new column which shows the number of completed runs per IP and also at the
bottom a value which displays the total sum of systems who completed at
I am wondering
I am wondering why only 68 out of 283 completed the traceroute. Can someone
explain please?
probably because the estimated time is between 4 and 96 days:
https://web.engr.illinois.edu/~das17/tor-traceroute_v1.html#q-howlong
my (low-bandwith) relay is trace-routing since 4 days and completed
Hi Renke,
Do you care to elaborate ? If you need assistance we can talk via private
mail as well ...
Bandwidth consumption is very low as you possible read on the project site.
Do you run the test with scamper and or did you turn down the scanning speed ?
The question remains why did many
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:04:01 +0100
Sebastian Urbach sebast...@urbach.org allegedly wrote:
My system, as an example, took about 2 days and 23 hours to complete
the run. I use scamper with the default settings. You can also turn
up the pps value and finish even faster.
How long will this
Hi Mick,
Thank you for running multiple turns and your time frame info as well :-)
--
Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Sincerely yours
Sebastian Urbach
--
Those who would give up essential Liberty,
to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve
neither
Sebastian,
Do you care to elaborate ? If you need assistance we can talk via
private mail as well ...
I use the script intentionally with scamper restricted to 200 pps - not
sure why (and what) I should elaborate ;)
The needed time (even for the default of scamper with 1000 pps) is imho
a
On Sunday 26 January 2014 16:27:12 renke brausse wrote:
The needed time (even for the default of scamper with 1000 pps) is imho
a rather good explanation to torland's question why only 68 of nearly
300 participating IPs finished the whole measurement at least once.
I launched the script from a
So I went through the data collected from the relays I
Ips used #relays
1 88
13 1
149 1
2 2
28 1
3 1
4 1
5 2
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:53 PM, tor-admin tor-ad...@torland.me wrote:
On Sunday 26 January 2014 16:27:12 renke brausse wrote:
The needed time (even for the default of scamper
