Re: [tor-relays] Two-step abuse management?

2017-09-14 Thread tor-relay . dirk
Hello Moritz, we run such an setting since several years. Whois records show our ripe object with abuse-r...@...as abuse-mailbox address. This is connected to an auto-responder. In auto-responder mail we explain what is going on and offer to write to our abuse@ email address. This really

Re: [tor-relays] Two-step abuse management?

2017-09-13 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 13.09.17 18:48, Moritz Bartl wrote: > Mind sharing that configuration, and maybe even the filters you > already set up? My method is highly Postfix-specific, but I can see that you use Postfix as well. ;-) Here is an example for sender-based rejection (incomplete):

Re: [tor-relays] Two-step abuse management?

2017-09-13 Thread Moritz Bartl
On 13.09.2017 16:08, Ralph Seichter wrote: > For my exit nodes, I have tested rejecting obviously auto-generated > complaints on arrival (SMTP code 5xx), with a customised text stating > how a human can get in touch with me via a different, unpublished mail > address. Cool. Mind sharing that

Re: [tor-relays] Two-step abuse management?

2017-09-13 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 13.09.17 15:49, Moritz Bartl wrote: > We're thinking about introducing an auto responder to abuse mail which > then requires clicking a link or replying to the mail again before the > complaint actually reaches a human. What do you think? For my exit nodes, I have tested rejecting obviously

[tor-relays] Two-step abuse management?

2017-09-13 Thread Moritz Bartl
Hi! tl;dr: We're thinking about introducing an auto responder to abuse mail which then requires clicking a link or replying to the mail again before the complaint actually reaches a human. What do you think? Can you help us set this up? So far, we do not have any auto responder for abuse mails.