Also keep in mind that what the bandwidth
authorities actually measure is not total capacity
but spare stream capacity (by downloading large
files through at least 5 different two hop
circuits times for each relay).
Wait... So if I understand this correctly
the bandwidth number is the difference
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 02:33:21PM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
The consensus weight is computed using
a) the relay's self-advertised bandwidth in its descriptor:
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/HEAD:/dir-spec.txt#l389
b) the ratios of bandwidth weights for various types of
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:02:29PM -0500, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote:
Also keep in mind that what the bandwidth
authorities actually measure is not total capacity
but spare stream capacity (by downloading large
files through at least 5 different two hop
circuits times for each relay).
This helps tremendously--thank you.
For the most part then it appears the consensus
bandwidth values assigned to the relay here
are within reasonable expectation allowing
for the methodology.
Lately have been seeing fairly stable and
moderate number of 225k vs the local 495k
calculation. Next
-relays]
bandwidth authority algorithm is cracked
The bandwidth authorities assign all kinds of wildly incorrect
capacities to the Tor node here.
The Tor relay software has been up for 45 days and has not been down
for more than five minutes for three or four months.
Occasional outages
: Vendredi 10 Janvier 2014 05:49:20 Objet: [tor-relays]
bandwidth authority algorithm is cracked
The bandwidth authorities assign all kinds of wildly incorrect
capacities to the Tor node here.
The Tor relay software has been up for 45 days and has not been down
for more than five minutes
!
Best regards Julien ROBIN
- Mail original - De: starlight 2014q1
starlight.201...@binnacle.cx À: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 10 Janvier 2014 05:49:20 Objet: [tor-relays]
bandwidth authority algorithm is cracked
The bandwidth authorities assign all
This could be a test of whether anyone enforces a moderation policy here.
On 14-01-21 05:59 PM, julien.robi...@free.fr wrote:
Hi Mike,
What you said is very interesting, it was the missing part for me to
understand why the weight of the relay in the consensus can drop (or rise
again) so
