Am 29.02.24 um 18:42 schrieb a...@kai.sx:
9 left
And one more added, so 8 left.
+1 = 7 left
Added one. 6 left.
4 left.
+1, 3 left
+1, 2 left
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
9 left
And one more added, so 8 left.
+1 = 7 left
Added one. 6 left.
4 left.
+1, 3 left
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>> On 27 Feb 2024, at 15:39, boldsuck wrote:
>> On Dienstag, 27. Februar 2024 14:52:00 CET Corl3ss via tor-relays wrote:
>>> On 26/02/2024 21:03, Toralf Förster via tor-relays wrote:
On 2/26/24 20:07, meskio wrote:
> At the moment we're
> looking for 10 new bridges for Lox.
If it
> On 27 Feb 2024, at 15:39, boldsuck wrote:
> On Dienstag, 27. Februar 2024 14:52:00 CET Corl3ss via tor-relays wrote:
>> On 26/02/2024 21:03, Toralf Förster via tor-relays wrote:
>>> On 2/26/24 20:07, meskio wrote:
At the moment we're
looking for 10 new bridges for Lox.
>>> 9
On 2/27/24 21:14, boldsuck wrote:
Gentoo & FreeBSD-Port Dev's and users are years
ahead ;-)
Whilst I'd agree on that my Tor bridges and Snowflakes do run under a
recent Debian. However Tor et al are compiled from sources. [1] [2]
[1]
On Dienstag, 27. Februar 2024 20:09:17 CET s7r wrote:
> Is there anything needed to do with previous setups that use obfs4proxy
> from it's default previous repository? Or just the name has been changed
> and everything is backward compatible?
For us on Debian, this will only change with the
boldsuck wrote:
On Dienstag, 27. Februar 2024 17:03:22 CET Toralf Förster via tor-relays wrote:
ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec /usr/bin/lyrebird
Ooh, obfs4proxy is renamed to Lyrebird?
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/lyrebird
Oh, that's new.
Don't
On Dienstag, 27. Februar 2024 17:03:22 CET Toralf Förster via tor-relays wrote:
> ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec /usr/bin/lyrebird
Ooh, obfs4proxy is renamed to Lyrebird?
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/lyrebird
> I do not specified the ipv6 port
On 2/27/24 16:38, boldsuck wrote:
ORPort 127.0.0.1:14255
ORPort [::1]:14255
I do not specified the ipv6 port explicietly:
SandBox 0
ORPort 127.0.0.1:auto
AssumeReachable 1
ExtORPort auto
ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec /usr/bin/lyrebird
Would it be needed?
--
Toralf
Quoting boldsuck (2024-02-27 16:38:59)
> Is hidden OR port OK for lox based bridge?
>
> ORPort 127.0.0.1:14255
> ORPort [::1]:14255
> AssumeReachable 1
Yes, that will be fine as long as your obfs4 port is reachable.
--
meskio | https://meskio.net/
On Dienstag, 27. Februar 2024 14:52:00 CET Corl3ss via tor-relays wrote:
> On 26/02/2024 21:03, Toralf Förster via tor-relays wrote:
> > On 2/26/24 20:07, meskio wrote:
> >> At the moment we're
> >> looking for 10 new bridges for Lox.
> >
> > 9 left
>
> And one more added, so 8 left.
+1 = 7 left
On 26/02/2024 21:03, Toralf Förster via tor-relays wrote:
On 2/26/24 20:07, meskio wrote:
At the moment we're
looking for 10 new bridges for Lox.
9 left
And one more added, so 8 left.
Meskio,
Feel free to reach me directly if further information needed.
Corl3ss
Quoting Toralf Förster via tor-relays (2024-02-26 21:07:50)
> On 2/26/24 20:07, meskio wrote:
> > Rdsys, the new bridgeDB, will not automatically assign bridges to Lox for
> > now,
> > but will instead accept bridges with the 'BridgeDistribution lox'
> > configured in
> > torrc.
>
> BTW by
On 2/26/24 20:07, meskio wrote:
Rdsys, the new bridgeDB, will not automatically assign bridges to Lox for now,
but will instead accept bridges with the 'BridgeDistribution lox' configured in
torrc.
BTW by accident I configured "any" but restarted tor with "lox" 2
minutes later. Does that work?
On 2/26/24 20:07, meskio wrote:
At the moment we're
looking for 10 new bridges for Lox.
9 left
--
Toralf
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hello,
We are developing a reputation based bridge distributor called Lox[0] and are
preparing to make a call for users to test it in Tor Browser Alpha. In order to
do this, we need to have some new bridges that can be distributed by Lox. Do
you
want to give us a hand running a bridge (or
Dear readers,
During the last week the bytes/second of my bridge dropped to 20% of its common
usage over the past months, while the average number of connected clients
stayed the same (according to metrics.torproject.org).
I'm also seeing a dozen circuit connections with purpose Hs_vanguards
On 19/04/2022 21:07, onion...@riseup.net wrote:
Hello, the Tor community. We already run relays and we have MyFamily
configured. Now we want to start bridges. Should bridges have a separate
family or we need to include them into relay family?
As bridges are semi-secret they should never be in
Hello, the Tor community. We already run relays and we have MyFamily
configured. Now we want to start bridges. Should bridges have a separate
family or we need to include them into relay family?
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Spydar007 via tor-relays:
Hello,
I notice (almost) all bridges are showing their distributor mechanism as None
on Tor Metrics.[1]
There are also hardly any in the latest pool assignments file from CollecTor.[2]
Curious as to why? Is this a change that needs fixing on a bridge operators
end,
Hello,
I notice (almost) all bridges are showing their distributor mechanism as None
on Tor Metrics.[1]
There are also hardly any in the latest pool assignments file from CollecTor.[2]
Curious as to why? Is this a change that needs fixing on a bridge operators
end, or simply BridgeDB not
If your server is not responding, no harm done (likely already done if
you have iptables set up to drop unknown (established flag not set)
incoming traffic.).
If it's somehow maxing out your connection speed, then time to talk to
your upstream provider / hosting company - very likely they already
According to packetflow traces, roughly 26,000 unique IPv4 from 85 countries
executing a SYN flood attack on TCP/9001. None of my bridges have 9001 open nor
respond to this port. The attacks continue to this day.
Danke.
Jonas
___
tor-relays mailing
ipp Winter)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 15:21:14 -0800
From: Philipp Winter
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Bridges under DDoS
Message-ID: <2020232114.rn2liq5gdnf3h...@nymity.ch>
Content-
Grüezi,
Over the past seven days, all of my bridges are under DDoS attack. Other
servers hosted with adjacent IP addresses are not under attack. Any one else
seeing such attacks lately?
Curious that all of my bridges are under attack, meaning someone altogether
knows they exist.
Thanks.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 09:05:24PM -, Jonas wrote:
> Over the past seven days, all of my bridges are under DDoS attack.
> Other servers hosted with adjacent IP addresses are not under attack.
* What kind of DDoS are you seeing? Is it a lot of network packets?
Or network connections?
*
On 11/11/20 10:05 PM, Jonas wrote:
Any one else seeing such attacks lately?
No
--
Toralf
OpenPGP_0xC4EACDDE0076E94E.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
Hi all,
So here is my script for automatically starting a Windows (Expert bundle
based) relay or bridge when windows starts.
Open a new notepad document. Then add the following to it:
Cd c:/pathwheretorexpertbundleisindtalled
tor.exe -f torrc.txt (assuming your torrc is a text file). Then save
>> generally speaking:
>> - please don't run bridges and exits at the same time
>
> Ok, that's news (I have not read this advice anywhere else)
it would allow end-to-end correlation and we had this before on this
list, I'll ask Moritz about his bridges again
>> - don't add MyFamily lines to
On 22/07/2018 18:57, nusenu wrote:
>> I am running a couple of relay nodes and now I would like to set a
>> bridge relay. The `torrc` file says the following:
>> ---
>> ## Uncomment this if you run more than one Tor relay, and add the identity
>> ## key fingerprint of each Tor relay you control,
> I am running a couple of relay nodes and now I would like to set a
> bridge relay. The `torrc` file says the following:
> ---
> ## Uncomment this if you run more than one Tor relay, and add the identity
> ## key fingerprint of each Tor relay you control, even if they're on
> ## different
Hi,
I am running a couple of relay nodes and now I would like to set a
bridge relay. The `torrc` file says the following:
---
## Uncomment this if you run more than one Tor relay, and add the identity
## key fingerprint of each Tor relay you control, even if they're on
## different networks. You
https://www.torproject.org/docs/bridges
"If you need to get bridges, you can get a bridge by visiting
https://bridges.torproject.org/ with your web browser.
You can also get bridges by sending mail to brid...@bridges.torproject.org with
the line "get bridges" by itself in the body of the
<<< text/html; charset=UTF-8: Unrecognized >>>
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hi,
On 15/11/17 07:13, Arisbe wrote:
> I use to review my bridges as well as my relays on Atlas. Now I don't
> find my bridges on nyx. Is this something I'm doing wrong?
Atlas and Nyx are different things. I've updated the subject and
hopefully someone familiar with Nyx can chime in.
Thanks,
Hi everyone.
I am currently operating 4 bridges on VPSs. They all appear to working
correctly. However, 2 of the 4 bridges have 0kb/s as their advertised
bandwidth while the other two are advertising around 100KB/s.
Is there a reason for the 0kb/s? Does this indicate an error in my bridges
or
36 matches
Mail list logo
