-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
>Since this is virtualization, make sure that features such as AES
>acceleration are active.
Yes, I have tested that. Is active.
>The number of cores is not really relevant since Tor is not
>multi-threaded. The EPYC 7702 can boost up to 3.35
Elias via tor-relays wrote:
> This is actually not a "real" root server, it's a KVM server (of
> course). The CPU is an AMD EPYC 7702 with 2 dedicated cores per
> server@3,35GHz.
Since this is virtualization, make sure that features such as AES
acceleration are active.
The number of cores is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thank you for your suggestions, Gary.
This is actually not a "real" root server, it's a KVM server (of course). The
CPU is an AMD EPYC 7702 with 2 dedicated cores per server@3,35GHz. I chose this
server because the bandwith is unmetered and it's
The following are some of the more important config options that I use for such
a small middle relay:
# Tor: A non-exit relay should be able to handle 7000 concurrent connections
ulimit -n 65535
DirCache 0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm sorry that I now spam the mailing list, but I made a mistake.
I'm of course NOT logging at debug level, it's just one logfile (notices.log).
I logged debug when I was running the relay on the VPS because I wanted to know
why it crashed all the
I just read this research paper, maybe it's worth thinking about some kind of
implementation of this approach some time in the future.
It's an interesting read anyway.
uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/16108/Engler_Steven.pdf
Regards
___
Hi Gary,
thank you for your response.
I think I just worry too much.
I watched my relay all the time today, I had bandwidth usage of 30MB/s at times
and HTOP showed me a Load average of 0.29/0.29/0.30. I know that this is
totally fine for a dual core.
The relay is up and running for 3 days and 8
It's surprising that you're running into CPU issues. It's typically RAM that is
exhausted first.
I have 5 x Dual Core 256MB Tor Relay Nodes loadbalanced as a Single Middle
Relay that never have CPU issues. It's always a matter of running out of RAM
for me. The loadbalanced Tor Relay
Hi everyone,
about two weeks ago, I signed up for a VPS with a cloud provider and set up a
Tor relay. I installed Debian 11 Bullseye, secured it, and then set up Tor
0.4.6.8 and started the relay.
The VPS had the following specs: 1vCore, 2GB RAM, 40TB traffic per month on a
1Gbit/s link. I
Hello Christian,
please also report back with the information you found out. I am also
pretty interested, running Tor Exits for various German NGOs this really
is a topic I am interested in.
Currently the fastests Exit I operate in Germany is "only" doing a
little more than 30MiB/s I think. But
Dear Tor friends,
the NGO I am volunteering for (Digitalcourage e.V.) has been running
modest Tor exits for many years. Now we finally have the opportunity
to run a high-bandwidth exit relay because we found a data center with
a nice internet connection (20 Gbit/s) we may use.
My question is:
Hello,
I clicked myself a cheap vserver 20 days ago and it runs Tor since then.
I mainly did this to play a bit with the relay, try around and so. I
took over another relay a while ago, an exit, I don't want to try around
on that.
It runs well, I got about 4,4 TB data up AND down since then, I
On March 26, 2015 8:59:45 PM yl t...@yl.ms wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
I clicked myself a cheap vserver 20 days ago and it runs Tor since then.
I mainly did this to play a bit with the relay, try around and so. I
took over another relay a while ago, an exit, I don't want to try around
on that.
It runs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I figured that the CPU is so busy because the vserver doesn't have
AES-NI, which I confirmed by some command I run (forgot the
command).
So I thought I might wanna move that relay to another server, maybe
at the same hoster to get higher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/01/2013 10:02 PM, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
I'm interested if there are any hardware accelerators in either
the Raspberry Pi (which needs all the help it can get) or the
Cubieboard 2 (A20-based).
To the best of my knowledge, no.
The RasPi is nice but it's also not terribly powerful. It definitely
has its limits. For example, I found out the hard way last weekend
that trying to run an Etherpad-Lite on a RasPi is a great way to run
one into the ground...
I have a RasPi Model B Rev 2 running etherpad-lite and a
Happily, it DOES appear that there may be some hope for the Allwinner A20 based
Cubieboard 2 (I haven't checked for the original Cubieboard yet):
The Security System (SS) is one encrypt/ decrypt function accelerator that is
suitable for a variety of
applications. It supports both encryption and
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:25:47AM +0200, Sarah Vigote wrote:
I would like to run a 100Mb/s tor exit node, but I have issues wrt
power consumption.
reading
http://ortizaudio.blogspot.fr/2011/10/using-dreamplugs-crypto-chip.html
it seems dreamplugs has *fast* aes-128-ecb.
Does anyone have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not sure why I missed this first post but I'm very interested in
working on this project with whomever is interested. I bought a
pogoplug v2 specifically to test it's usefulness as a tor exit or relay.
- -Jason
On 10/01/2013 06:39 PM, Andy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would love to do all this actually but I never managed to get the hw
accelerated crypto (ssl/tls) bits working to experiment with. I'd be
up for restarting this if I knew I could consult with one or two
others who had a genuine interest in this.
-
On 2013-10-01 21:20, Andy Isaacson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 06:45:52PM +, jason wrote:
I'm not sure why I missed this first post but I'm very interested in
working on this project with whomever is interested. I bought a
pogoplug v2 specifically to test it's usefulness as a tor exit
Am Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:25:47 +0200
schrieb Sarah Vigote pixe...@riseup.net:
I once meassured the performance of the padlock crypto chip
on a VIA Esther C7 1500 MHz processor. Result:
AES-128 cbc with padlock is about 14 times faster compared to the C7
with padlock disabled.
regards,
Fabian
hi,
hi,
I would like to run a 100Mb/s tor exit node, but I have issues wrt
power consumption.
reading
http://ortizaudio.blogspot.fr/2011/10/using-dreamplugs-crypto-chip.html
it seems dreamplugs has *fast* aes-128-ecb.
Does anyone have any experience running a node based on cheap crypto
chip
A10-6800K (4 x 4.1GHz) would be decent.
It doesn't seem to support ECC
It doesn't. And for those that recognize its importance, that's
been an kind of weakness of AMD for some time. Actually
for both AMD and Intel, it's treated as a price premium
instead of just 8+n extra gates and logic.
Andy Isaacson:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 08:46:20PM +0200, Andreas Fink wrote:
can someone give me hints on what hardware would be best suited to run
big fat tor exit nodes connected with multiple 1gbps or 10gps links?
We are considering putting some fat boxes near major internet
exchanges
can someone give me hints on what hardware would be best suited to run big fat
tor exit nodes connected with multiple 1gbps or 10gps links? We are considering
putting some fat boxes near major internet exchanges of the world.
sent from iPhone
___
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 08:46:20PM +0200, Andreas Fink wrote:
can someone give me hints on what hardware would be best suited to run
big fat tor exit nodes connected with multiple 1gbps or 10gps links?
We are considering putting some fat boxes near major internet
exchanges of the world.
On Apr 1, 2012, at 2:22 PM, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
oh hai.
Do you know if this
applies to the released 0.3.13-alpha version from the 26th of March ?
It does not, that's why I said it isn't in any released version of tor.
The next one should contain it, until then you're
28 matches
Mail list logo
