On Tue, 22 May 2012 16:21:46 -0500
Jon torance...@gmail.com allegedly wrote:
The port was 57734 - of course that doesn't mean another port could
be used
That looks like a source port to me. In my case, the (allegedly)
attacked ports were 80, so clearly webservers.
Mick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
We also get (and ignore) these automated reports. Try to convince your
ISP to reassign the IP range and list you as abuse contact.
If that does not work, you can simply block celepar's ranges:
- From scanning 129 recent mails:
Destination:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
We also get (and ignore) these automated reports. Try to convince your
ISP to reassign the IP range and list you as abuse contact.
If that does not work, you can simply block celepar's ranges.
Scanning 129 recent mails:
Destination:
same here. someone using sqlmap
--
[]s Fosforo
-
Only the wisest and stupidest of men never change.
-Confusio
-
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:18 AM, mick m...@rlogin.net wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Fosforo fosf...@gmail.com wrote:
same here. someone using sqlmap
--
[]s Fosforo
-
Only the wisest and stupidest of men never change.
-Confusio
On Tue, 22 May 2012 13:29:54 -0500
Jon torance...@gmail.com allegedly wrote:
Yep same here, got notice today from ISP on a report of the 20th for
alledged hacking with someone using sqlmap. the reporting ip was a
brazilian gov ip address.
I just blocked the port and kept on serving
mick m...@rlogin.net wrote on 22.05.2012:
I assume you mean IP address rather than port here.
Despite offering, I wasn't given the opportunity to do that.
Interesting that you also seem to have been used in targetting the
brazilian government.
I can confirm abuse messages for same
I can also confirm same attack it must have been huge o.o
On 22 May 2012 20:17, tor-admin tor-ad...@torland.me wrote:
mick m...@rlogin.net wrote on 22.05.2012:
I assume you mean IP address rather than port here.
Despite offering, I wasn't given the opportunity to do that.
