Re: [tor-relays] tornull

2017-05-01 Thread Dirk
Hello Teor, not sure how this other thread answers my question. Rather the question raised goes in the same direction as mine. "I worry about blindly following a list of rejected subnets. I won't argue that it's not safer for the exit operator, but I hope someone's cross-checking and confirming

Re: [tor-relays] tornull

2017-05-01 Thread tor-relay . dirk
It was two days ago. Today I can not reach it as well. best regards Dirk On 01.05.2017 08:08, scar wrote: > I was unable to reach the site, is it still in operation? > > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org >

Re: [tor-relays] tornull

2017-05-01 Thread scar
I was unable to reach the site, is it still in operation? ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] tornull

2017-04-30 Thread teor
> On 29 Apr 2017, at 05:09, Dirk wrote: > > Dear all, > > I was made aware of the Tor Null Advisory BL [1] which is also mentioned > in trac here [2]. > Block Botnets does not seem like a bad idea in principal. > > But the page has no listing of a responsible person

[tor-relays] tornull

2017-04-28 Thread Dirk
Dear all, I was made aware of the Tor Null Advisory BL [1] which is also mentioned in trac here [2]. Block Botnets does not seem like a bad idea in principal. But the page has no listing of a responsible person neither any criteria listed which it chooses to identify "bad" IPs. Looking at some