Re: [tor-relays] Onionoo down?

2015-10-03 Thread Karsten Loesing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The host ran out of free inodes, I sent a request to admins to make more inodes available. It might take another 12 or 24 hours until the service is back. Sorry for the inconvenience. On 03/10/15 12:02, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: > >> On 3

Re: [tor-relays] Onionoo down?

2015-10-03 Thread Dominik Ungar
seems to be up now, no errors at my end 2015-10-03 7:30 GMT+02:00 Tim Wilson-Brown - teor : > > On 3 Oct 2015, at 01:19, Geoff Down wrote: > > A query using Globe stalls at the 'processing - please wait' stage, so I > assume the problem is actually

[tor-relays] replace BandwidthRate with "traffic control" on busy routers

2015-10-03 Thread Dhalgren Tor
Routers running at or near a BandwidthRate setting offer terrible latency and induce connection time-outs. Refuse all DIR-port requests with "HTTP/1.0 503 Directory busy, try again later ". 'tc' ingress filter is dramatically better for rate-limiting. For case and 'tc' example see final post

Re: [tor-relays] excessive bandwidth assigned bandwidth-limited exit relay

2015-10-03 Thread Dhalgren Tor
Was going to wait a few days before reporting back, but early results are decisive. The overload situation continued to worsen over a two-day period, with consensus weight continuing to rise despite the relay often running in a state of extreme overload and performing its exit function quite

Re: [tor-relays] how important is configuring DNSSEC root trust anchor for 'unbound' running on an exit node?

2015-10-03 Thread Dhalgren Tor
Spent a few minutes activating the DNSSEC trust-anchor for 'unbound'. Ran 'dig' on a few signed domains and observed that queries that took under 50 milliseconds without went to 2000 milliseconds with. My attitude toward DNSSEC has deteriorated steadily over time and this finishes it off for me.

Re: [tor-relays] excessive bandwidth assigned bandwidth-limited exit relay

2015-10-03 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 3 Oct 2015, at 19:09, Dhalgren Tor wrote: > > Was going to wait a few days before reporting back, but early results > are decisive. > > The overload situation continued to worsen over a two-day period, with > consensus weight continuing to rise despite the relay