5$ for 512 MB RAM, 1 Core and 20 Gig SSD Space is actually bad if you ask me.
Don't know if this is normal in the US but compared to my provider this is
really expensive.
That's why I asked if there's something special about D.O. that makes that
price appropriate.
It's like you're running a
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:26:05 +, Admin Kode-IT wrote:
...
> It's like you're running a Rasperry Pi 1 with an SSD and a good Network for
> 5$/month.
A Raspberry doesn't do GBit. Also, you forget to mention the traffic;
I pay somewhat more to have more traffic allowance at my hoster
even though
Still, $5 is dirt cheap. You probably need to compare more providers.
On 09/13/2016 04:14 PM, Markus Koch wrote:
> Seflow is only 1,99 € ... So compared to $5 DigitalOcean is expensive
> :)
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 13 Sep 2016, at 15:01, Tristan
There are worlds between a Rasperry Pi1 and the DigitalOcean VPS. $5 is dirt
cheap. What provider do you use?
Sent from my iPad
> On 13 Sep 2016, at 17:26, Admin Kode-IT wrote:
>
> 5$ for 512 MB RAM, 1 Core and 20 Gig SSD Space is actually bad if you ask me.
> Don't know if
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:26:05 +
"Admin Kode-IT" wrote:
> It's like you're running a Rasperry Pi 1 with an SSD and a good Network for
> 5$/month.
From my quick testing a DO droplet provides at least 6 times faster CPU than a
Raspberry Pi 1, and more likely closer to 10-20x
Running 2 guard/middle for months now, no problem at all. Support told me they
only dont want to host warez.
Tor ≠ warez
markus
Sent from my iPad
> On 13 Sep 2016, at 17:15, jensm1 wrote:
>
> SeFlow does not allow Tor nodes, though, if the good/bad isp wiki-page is any
>
I’m using Webtropia at the moment.
There are worlds between a Rasperry Pi1 and the DigitalOcean VPS. $5 is dirt
cheap. What provider do you use?
Sent from my iPad
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
SeFlow does not allow Tor nodes, though, if the good/bad isp wiki-page
is any indication.
Am 13.09.2016 um 16:14 schrieb Markus Koch:
Seflow is only 1,99 € ... So compared to $5 DigitalOcean is expensive
:)
Sent from my iPad
On 13 Sep 2016, at 15:01, Tristan
Right now my relay is set at a maximum advertised bandwidth of 12MB/s, over
time as the traffic has increased I've noticed that the traffic would
increase a large amount and then my consensus weight would drop on its own
over time, and then the traffic would drop drastically, is there any reason
> On 13 Sep 2016, at 23:30, jensm1 wrote:
>
> I last restarted the relay five days ago (update to 0.2.8.7). Can a restart
> really cause the consensus weight to drop several days later? If it drops
> within a few hours, I'd get that, but what would delay that response that
>
Well noted. Thanks.
From: tor-relays [tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] on behalf of teor
[teor2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 2:12
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tor path selection upon failure
>
Make sure you switched to EPEL's tor packages if you used torproject's
RPM repository in the past.
EPEL provides the latest tor version (currently 0.2.8.7 [2]), former
torproject RPMs are no longer updated at all [1].
The migration to EPEL packages includes some manual steps, like
filesystem
On 13 September 2016 at 20:34, jensm1 wrote:
> Addendum: Did a bit of research (or rather checked some random relays on
> Atlas).
>
> It seems like it's not only my relay that experienced a significant drop at
> the same time. I can't find anything obvious these relays have in
That's exactly what baffles me. I didn't make any changes to the relay
configuration since updating to 0.2.8.7. I've always had some
fluctuations in the Advertised Bandwidth as reported by Atlas, but I
assume these are from the BWAuth measurements?
The only thing on my end, that I could imagine,
Hey,
Since 1-2 months I'm using a VPS on this provider, don't want to
advertise here, but only share my little experience:
https://www.pcextreme.com/aurora/compute
Starting price is 3€/month for a virtual machine - 20G SSD - 512 RAM -
(Have to check bandwidth... hosted in a datacenter, so...)
> On 14 Sep 2016, at 15:49, Matthew Walker wrote:
>
> If you're interested in knowing what happens when you scale up (in the USA),
> I recently went on a quest to move from a collection of virtual private
> servers to some sort of dedicated solution.
>
> * The cheapest
If you're interested in knowing what happens when you scale up (in the
USA), I recently went on a quest to move from a collection of virtual
private servers to some sort of dedicated solution.
* The cheapest I found in a tor friendly fully dedicated server is 70$/mo
for 1Gbps transit (via OVH)
*
1 TB traffic :(
2016-09-14 6:19 GMT+02:00 Petrusko :
> Hey,
> Since 1-2 months I'm using a VPS on this provider, don't want to
> advertise here, but only share my little experience:
> https://www.pcextreme.com/aurora/compute
> Starting price is 3€/month for a virtual machine
Is there something special about D.O.? The server prices are quite high in my
opinion.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Am 13.09.2016 um 12:32 schrieb Ralph Seichter:
> On 13.09.2016 00:01, Dave Warren wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016, at 06:53, Ralph Seichter wrote:
>>
>>> Leaves me with figuring out what Linux distro to use,
>>> as D.O. does not offer Gentoo.
>>
>> D.O. has images for Debian (8.5, 7.11), Ubuntu
On 13.09.2016 00:01, Dave Warren wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016, at 06:53, Ralph Seichter wrote:
>
> > Leaves me with figuring out what Linux distro to use,
> > as D.O. does not offer Gentoo.
>
> D.O. has images for Debian (8.5, 7.11), Ubuntu (16.04.1, 14.04.5,
> 12.04.5), but no Gentoo.
I know,
> On 13 Sep 2016, at 18:05, jensm1 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just realised that my relay 'itwasntme' lost most of its consensus
> weight yesterday morning. The relay is only three weeks old, but it was
> finally picking up some traffic, which now is gone again.
> What could be the
On 13.09.2016 12:34, Michael Armbruster wrote:
> You all did read my message that Debian can be converted to Arch Linux
> on DigitalOcean, right?
Duly noted (speaking for myself only, of course).
> That would leave you with bleeding edge software as you know it from
> Gentoo.
I checked
If your concern is security you shouldn't use OpenSSL in the first place.
My pick would be OpenBSD or Gentoo with LibreSSL if it's security wise.
Stable is for servers great because bleeding edge might break once in awhile
and for decent amount of uptime you want to keep it going without to worry
Seflow is only 1,99 € ... So compared to $5 DigitalOcean is expensive :)
Sent from my iPad
> On 13 Sep 2016, at 15:01, Tristan wrote:
>
> Well, if $5 a month is high for you, I don't know what to say.
>
>
>> On Sep 13, 2016 4:01 AM, "Admin Kode-IT"
Is there something special about D.O.? The server prices are quite high in my
opinion.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I last restarted the relay five days ago (update to 0.2.8.7). Can a
restart really cause the consensus weight to drop several days later? If
it drops within a few hours, I'd get that, but what would delay that
response that much?
(Not complaining, just genuinely curious.)
Am 13.09.2016 um 10:37
Well, if $5 a month is high for you, I don't know what to say.
On Sep 13, 2016 4:01 AM, "Admin Kode-IT" wrote:
> Is there something special about D.O.? The server prices are quite high
> in my opinion.
>
> ___
> tor-relays mailing
> On 13 Sep 2016, at 14:02, Liu, Zhuotao wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
Hi,
Please don't cross post to multiple lists, it makes it hard for people to
follow all the responses.
Can I suggest that everyone replies to tor-dev, as it's the list for Tor
development, feature, and issue
Hi,
I just realised that my relay 'itwasntme' lost most of its consensus
weight yesterday morning. The relay is only three weeks old, but it was
finally picking up some traffic, which now is gone again.
What could be the cause for this? Is there a problem with my relay or
configuration?
Thanks
30 matches
Mail list logo