How is exit probability counted? Is it only port 80 exit tested? I exit many
1000s of ports, including 443, but not those of high risk of abuse emails and
thus upsetting the ISP. So port 80 along with others are blocked. I realise
no port 80 limits the use of the exit so not expecting so
On 29 Oct 2017, at 23:30, Toralf Förster wrote:
>> On 10/29/2017 01:24 PM, teor wrote:
>> Possibly.
>>
>> Are the relays CPU-limited, or bandwidth-limited?
>
> Not at all, neither limited by a config value nor by the hardware (1GBit/s,
> 200 MBit/s guaranteed, i7-3930,
> These nodes are popping up everywhere - is this some sort of malware being
> deployed on systems around the globe?
Interesting. It does look like malware to me.
- all running Tor 0.3.1.7 on Linux
- diverse AS / IP allocation, mostly looks like ISP end-subscriber
- same exit policy (reject
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 03:23:07AM +, Paul Templeton wrote:
> These nodes are popping up everywhere - is this some sort of malware being
> deployed on systems around the globe?
It is an Ubuntu snap package. See this thread:
These nodes are popping up everywhere - is this some sort of malware being
deployed on systems around the globe?
Paul
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hi,
It looks like 94.7% of all Running relays have the "Fast" flag now. If
that percentage becomes 100%, the flag will become meaningless.
What were the reasons behind the current definition of "Fast", and are
those still valid? If not, should "Fast" become self-adjusting
("faster than 2 Mbps or