Hi everybody
Sep 18 21:00:22.384 [notice] Tor 0.4.4.5 running on FreeBSD with
Libevent 2.1.12-stable, OpenSSL LibreSSL 3.2.1, Zlib 1.2.11, Liblzma
5.2.4, and Libzstd 1.4.5.
moria1 Fast Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=566
tor26 Fast Guard Stab V2Dir Valid
dizum Fast Guard Stab
On 9/20/20 12:57 PM, Felix wrote:
>
> Please somebody can _confirm_ this thing?
Much more worse:
The relay here under a hardened Gentoo Linux with LibreSSL 3.2.1 has only 50%
of the amount of the conenctions as with 3.2.0 at all - and the TCP traffic
dropped down by nearly 100%.
I recompiled
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 12:57:46PM +0200, Felix wrote:
> Libressl 321 is not compatible to what is needed to make the authorities
> tor26, dizum, gabel., maatu. and longc. happy (let them not grant a
> "Running"). What can that be?
>
> Please somebody can _confirm_ this thing?
You're not crazy.
On 9/20/20 12:57 PM, Felix wrote:
>>
> Libressl 321 is not compatible to what is needed to make the authorities
> tor26, dizum, gabel., maatu. and longc. happy (let them not grant a
> "Running"). What can that be?
Just upgraded here 2 tor-0.4.5.0 (Gentoo Linux, same ip) from 3.2.0 to 3.2.1
Will
On 9/17/20 11:51 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
On 9/16/20 1:05 AM, Michael Gerstacker wrote:
the only relay i don't want to be a fallback anymore is a fallback now
Maybe OT but I'm just curious about the reason to want a relay being not a
fallback.
I've written some rules for iptables like what on your Github but it
didn't work. I also set up virtual server like this:
| External port start: 9001 | External port end: 9001 | Internal port
start: 9001 | Internal port end: 9001 |
Did I configure it right?
On 16/09/2020 20:00,
