Re: [tor-relays] Questions about Tor consensus weight & swag

2023-02-18 Thread shruub via tor-relays
Feb 18, 2023 12:31:31 trinity pointard 'trinity.pointard at gmail.com' : > Hi, > > You shouldn't worry too much about your relay sometime appearing as > overloaded. Sadly due to the ongoing network ddos, many relays show up > that way. You shouldn't restart your relay daily, that would make >

Re: [tor-relays] Questions about Tor consensus weight & swag

2023-02-18 Thread s7r
shruub via tor-relays wrote: I also (stupidly) tried to have a cron restarting my tor daemon daily which also resulted in the latter. So I wonder, if there is any way to have a relay run more stable and I suppose with a somewhat higher consensus weight (I can only asssume making some further

Re: [tor-relays] Questions about Tor consensus weight & swag

2023-02-18 Thread trinity pointard
Hi, You shouldn't worry too much about your relay sometime appearing as overloaded. Sadly due to the ongoing network ddos, many relays show up that way. You shouldn't restart your relay daily, that would make everybody think it's not very stable, so you won't be able to get flags such as Stable,

Re: [tor-relays] Confusing bridge signs...

2023-02-18 Thread lists
On Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2023 06:15:02 CET Keifer Bly wrote: > So my bridge at > https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/4D6E3CA2110FC36D3106C86940A1D > 4C8C91923AB says it has “none “, Well, then you have configured BridgeDistribution (Default: any) to none. > though the torrc file has

[tor-relays] Questions about Tor consensus weight & swag

2023-02-18 Thread shruub via tor-relays
Hello, so my relay regulary gets overloaded, for what I can only assume is an hardware issue, (which I can't upgrade rn) since I already applied the tor anti ddos scripts. It seems to be able to recover, however with a lower Consensus Weight. I also (stupidly) tried to have a cron restarting my

[tor-relays] removing tor versions from "recommended versions" before they reach EOL

2023-02-18 Thread nusenu
Hi, the tor 0.4.5.x end of live versions are still on the recommended versions list: https://consensus-health.torproject.org/#recommendedversions consensus client-versions 0.4.5.6, 0.4.5.7, 0.4.5.8, 0.4.5.9, 0.4.5.10, 0.4.5.11, 0.4.5.12, 0.4.5.14, 0.4.5.15, 0.4.5.16, 0.4.7.7, 0.4.7.8,

Re: [tor-relays] Questions about Tor consensus weight & swag

2023-02-18 Thread shruub via tor-relays
> makes you lose flags, and it also might be the reason your consensus weight was lowered. I'm not sure if I actually lost flags, but yes, that is probably the main reason. > RelayBandwidthBurst One question, what actually is the burst? Haven't found anything online nor in man. > There's not

Re: [tor-relays] Confusing bridge signs...

2023-02-18 Thread Keifer Bly
Ok. Here is the torrc file: GNU nano 3.2 /etc/tor/torrc Nickname gbridge ORPort 443 SocksPort 0 BridgeRelay 1 PublishServerDescriptor bridge ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec /usr/bin/obfs4proxy ServerTransportListenAddr obfs4 0.0.0.0:8080 ExtOrPort auto Log