On 9/18/13 2:53 AM, Damian Johnson wrote:
Unless maybe stem already does exactly this for us?
Yup, stem parses the extrainfo descriptors...
https://stem.torproject.org/api/descriptor/extrainfo_descriptor.html#stem.descriptor.extrainfo_descriptor.ExtraInfoDescriptor
The only pesky bit is
Roger Dingledine:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 08:27:57PM +0200, Moritz Bartl wrote:
The recipient share is calculated from the
throughput per relay * country factor
It might be worthwhile to make it clearer what throughput is here.
I hope it's not consensus weight, since that's not really
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On Sep 18, 2013 7:11 AM, t...@t-3.net wrote:
I wonder if I am the only one who finds this creepy, in light of all of
the news that has come out lately about the banking systems having been
hacked, etc. This kind of thing would draw a direct line of sorts to the
bank account of the person/company
On 18 September 2013 08:10, t...@t-3.net wrote:
The OP I saw said:
The Wau Holland Foundation can currently only
reimburse via wire transfer.
This seems to be end-of-story in terms of who, in the end, is ultimately
getting liability/risk, and points to practically no chance at anonymity
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hey folks,
Here are my reports. First the good news: it's WAY more stable. Then
the bad news: it still gets OOM-killed once in a while, possibly
preventably.
THE GOOD (notes from September 14):
Here's my Pi relay since compilation of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Addendum: restarting tor instantly puts my router into a tailspin this
morning. This is a WRT54G (old school, 3.0 hardware, 200MHz MIPS).
While that's old, there are many, many consumer routers out there with
similar specs and worse firmware. In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Addendum to addendum: the router fail is definitely caused by Tor
connections filling up the router's ip_conntrack table - once it gets
near full, it somehow interferes with a couple other services on my
router (especially DNSmasq) even if there is
You may be able to increase the ip_conntrack_max on your router. I had
a terrible verizon dsl router that would have its connection tracking
capacity exhausted by pings to games servers. I was able to partially
resolve the problem my telnetting (yea I know) into the router and
setting the
On 09/18/2013 07:31 AM, Tom Ritter wrote:
On Sep 18, 2013 7:11 AM, t...@t-3.net mailto:t...@t-3.net wrote:
I wonder if I am the only one who finds this creepy...
Nope, I don't think so. Perhaps it's the timing. In this post-Snowden
period most everything is a little bit creepy. There's
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 20:41:17 +0200
Christian Dietrich christian.d.dietr...@gmail.com allegedly wrote:
Thanks, but both relays have been started at the same time.
Due to the fact that they also have the same configuration,
both should offer up to 1 gigabit/s bandwidth.
RelayBandwidthRate 125
Weird that #1 has the stable flag and #2 don't then.
Stable -- A router is 'Stable' if it is active, and either its
Weighted MTBF is at least the median for known active routers or its
Weighted MTBF corresponds to at least 7 days.
The above suggests that #1 has been known to the dirauths for a
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:36:39 -0400
Rick reru...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope, I don't think so. Perhaps it's the timing. In this post-Snowden
period most everything is a little bit creepy. There's plenty of FUD
to go around. A position paper from Torproject on this and other
recent issues would be
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:50:46AM -0700, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
The replay has settled into a fairly steady state (after losing its
flags except Named) of sending 5-10KB more per sec than it gets. I
have a feeling this is literally due to the TAP replies being bigger
than the TAP requests.
It's a little old.
Posted July 24, 2012
We knew a lot less on that date.
On Wednesday 18/09/2013 at 3:08 pm, Andrew Lewman wrote:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:36:39 -0400
Rick reru...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope, I don't think so. Perhaps it's the timing. In this post-Snowden
period most
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 08:10:25AM -0400, t...@t-3.net wrote:
The Wau Holland Foundation can currently only
reimburse via wire transfer.
This seems to be end-of-story in terms of who, in the end, is
ultimately getting liability/risk, and points to practically no
chance at anonymity
Think
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:57:54PM +0200, Christian Dietrich wrote:
Now my problem is that tor relay #2 generates almost no traffic.
https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/myTOR
Log Relay #2:
Circuit handshake stats since last time: 63/63 TAP, 1/1 NTor.
Heartbeat: Tor's uptime
Think bigger, say what?
Certain of the world's biggest and most well-funded intelligence
agencies hate personal privacy on the internet so much that they've
been going to extreme efforts to destroy it. They are packet sniffing
the NAPs and fiber backbones to pull out everything they can,
Nope, I don’t have any special pluggable transports configured in my torrc,
which is odd. What other processes would for be starting kicking off? All I
have set in torrc is: RunAsDaemon, CookieAuthentication, SocksPort /
SocksPolicy, PortForwarding and ExitPolicy (reject *:*), and
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:43:25 -0400, Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:50:46AM -0700, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
The replay has settled into a fairly steady state (after losing its
flags except Named) of sending 5-10KB more per sec than it gets. I
have a feeling
While I believe you have a good point
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:29:26 -0400, t...@t-3.net wrote:
Think bigger, say what?
Certain of the world's biggest and most well-funded intelligence
agencies hate personal privacy on the internet so much that they've
been going to extreme efforts
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:10:25 -0400, t...@t-3.net wrote:
The OP I saw said:
The Wau Holland Foundation can currently only
reimburse via wire transfer.
This seems to be end-of-story in terms of who, in the end, is
ultimately getting liability/risk, and points to practically no chance
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:16:48 -0400, josh j...@allensw.com wrote:
You may be able to increase the ip_conntrack_max on your router. I had
I can, and have, but eventually its 16MB of RAM becomes a problem. ;)
The bigger deal, though, is I'm attempting to cobble together a set of scripts
and
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 05:43:13PM -0700, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
Thanks, Roger. I'm still not sure what finally caused the OOM-killer
crash this morning after almost a couple weeks (?) of uptime. I was
also seeing additional clock jump messages but didn't have time to
diagnose it. The Pi
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:29:26 -0400
t...@t-3.net wrote:
In the context of September 2013, this whole thing is scary. It was
perhaps not scary in September of 2012, when we didn't know anything.
Just a point that many in the tech community knew what was happening, at
some level, for the past
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 08:20:18PM -0400, Michael Gorbach wrote:
Nope, I don?t have any special pluggable transports configured in my
torrc, which is odd. What other processes would for be starting kicking
off? All I have set in torrc is [...] PortForwarding
That's likely the one!
You might be
26 matches
Mail list logo
