Roger that :)
thank you.
On 11/10/2013 10:01 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 09:58:20PM -0500, gq wrote:
On the "Message Log" console I was seeing hourly entries for TAP and
nTor connections.
Yep.
After over a week, I was getting very low traffic, so rolled back to
the s
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 09:58:20PM -0500, gq wrote:
> On the "Message Log" console I was seeing hourly entries for TAP and
> nTor connections.
Yep.
> After over a week, I was getting very low traffic, so rolled back to
> the stable version vidalia-relay-bundle-0.2.3.25-0.2.21-2.exe to
> compare,
I was running a non-exit relay using beta RC version
vidalia-relay-bundle-0.2.4.17-rc-0.2.21.exe on win XP
On the "Message Log" console I was seeing hourly entries for TAP and
nTor connections.
After over a week, I was getting very low traffic, so rolled back to the
stable version vidalia-re
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Claudio wrote:
You're right, just a few actually do proxy. With a few seconds timeout
only 162.243.5.88 and 78.47.41.125 do to me at the moment.
Good to know. I don't see a contact for 162.243.5.88 and I sent mail to the
contact address listed for 78.47.41.125 in Septembe
On 11/10/2013 08:15 PM, Aaron Hopkins wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Claudio wrote:
>
>> Host: 66.180.193.219 (tor-proxy.die.net)Ports:
>> 8118/open/tcp//privoxy///
>
> Want to make HTTP requests through these ports and see who will actually
> proxy content for you?
>
> If you try making a re
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Claudio wrote:
Host: 66.180.193.219 (tor-proxy.die.net)Ports: 8118/open/tcp//privoxy///
Want to make HTTP requests through these ports and see who will actually
proxy content for you?
If you try making a request through this port on tor-proxy.die.net, it won't
pro
On 13-11-10 08:04 AM, Claudio wrote:
> Some months ago I encountered a situation where a user running an exit
> node with a publicly exposed privoxy (intentionally or not, I'm not
> sure) was constantly receiving a number of requests directed to
> advertisement networks.
> Fundamentally, someone is
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 04:13:00PM -0800, Nelson wrote:
> I do believe there is a benefit to Torrents as many of us can attest to,
> ex: fast downloads of different Linux distros; but if your use of
> Torrents is in fact legit then why use Tor for downloading your legal
> content in the first plac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everyone,
Some months ago I encountered a situation where a user running an exit
node with a publicly exposed privoxy (intentionally or not, I'm not
sure) was constantly receiving a number of requests directed to
advertisement networks.
Fundamen
This is true. Some websites download lists of all relays and just mass
block the ips. Its usually webmasters who have no idea how tor works and
don't realise that a middle relay poses them no threat whatsoever. This is
why education is best. If someone is blocking your IP, just email them
explainin
10.11.2013 07:56, gq:
> Dave,
>
> Unless I am mistaken, your non-exit relay never connects to a web page.
> Only exit relays do that, so it can't be your IP that is blocked but
> whatever exit relay you may be connecting through.
The original problem seemed to be that Skype rejects connection att
11 matches
Mail list logo
