Hello,
We have been operating a moderately successful public tor relay for a
while now. Having read about how TOR works back a couple of years ago, I
was more or less sold on the idea that if traffic originating on your
local network uses your own TOR relay as the first hop (entry node), then
Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu writes:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:02:27PM +, nusenu wrote:
now even DocTor starts to complain
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-consensus-health/2015-May/005772.html
From what I've seen, there were only two messages from DocTor about
this (Mon May
To be a bwauth you have to be a dirauth, if the bwauth draft spec I read
was correct. But how do you become a dirauth? The addresses are
hardcoded into Tor, so it's not like I could just spin up a dirauth in
an evening and let the network do the rest. There's got to be more to it.
I was
On Wednesday, 20 May 2015, Speak Freely when2plus2...@riseup.net wrote:
To be a bwauth you have to be a dirauth, if the bwauth draft spec I read
was correct. But how do you become a dirauth? The addresses are
hardcoded into Tor, so it's not like I could just spin up a dirauth in
an evening
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:16:36PM -0400, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote:
but in the last few days the BWAuths'
opinion went from
bw1-w Bandwidth=7382 Measured=7100
*bw2-w Bandwidth=7382 Measured=9330
bw3-w Bandwidth=7382 Measured=13700 GuardFraction=69
bw4-w Bandwidth=7382
Should probably add that this
relay was tuned and would be
expected to show somewhat better
performance than a typical relay
of the same capacity, but
I wouldn't expect more than
a 20-30% boost from that.
The local bandwidth observation
was, at the time of the consensus
sample
published
Hi all,
Wanted to provide an update (even if it's not as good news as I hoped
to give) because I know this is a very frustrating issue for everyone.
At a high level, the bwauth scripts segment the network into four
segments ranked by relay speed, and measure each of these segments.
They are
Some possible fallout related to
the earlier discussion
[tor-relays] amount of unmeasured relays continuously rising since 2 weeks
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2015-May/007003.html
My relay
Binnacle 4F0DB7E687FC7C0AE55C8F243DA8B0EB27FBF1F2
has 9375 Kbyte (75 Mbit) of
