Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor

2015-07-06 Thread Karsten Loesing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/07/15 00:31, Geoff Down wrote: On Sun, Jul 5, 2015, at 02:26 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/07/15 14:20, teor wrote: On 5 Jul 2015, at 19:37 , Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.org

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-07-06 Thread Speak Freely
Starlight, I created this relay on Friday, shortly after you told me to be patient. https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/41C526E3C1441A3CDE9B605002643B94F3750E8C Uptime: 3 days 23 hours CW: 1100 (yesterday it was at 740) It gained consensus after 48 hours, but you said it would take 2 weeks?

Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor

2015-07-06 Thread josh
From the perspective of someone investigating abuse, I think it's important that 'not an exit relay' means 'not capable of exiting on any port at all'. Ergo I think your option c) is the way to go. I also think this (c) is the best option. I agree that it's important to be able to determine,

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-07-06 Thread josh
Hi Matt, Which relays are you have issues with? Kind Regards, Joshua Lee Tucker @tuckerwales http://tucker.wales On 6 Jul 2015, at 19:41, Speak Freely when2plus2...@riseup.net wrote: Starlight, I created this relay on Friday, shortly after you told me to be patient.

Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor

2015-07-06 Thread teor
On 7 Jul 2015, at 09:46 , josh@tucker.wales wrote: From the perspective of someone investigating abuse, I think it's important that 'not an exit relay' means 'not capable of exiting on any port at all'. Ergo I think your option c) is the way to go. I also think this (c) is the best