Re: [tor-relays] Bots, love 'em or hate 'em?

On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 10:30:38AM -0400, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: > This is curious: Appears a large number of Tor > client-bots have set > > UseEntryGuards 0 > > From current relays that have never had the guard flag: > > extra-info moep

Re: [tor-relays] Bots, love 'em or hate 'em?

On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 02:03:07 -0400 Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 10:30:38AM -0400, > starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: > > This is curious: Appears a large number of Tor > > client-bots have set > > > > UseEntryGuards 0 > > > > From current relays that

[tor-relays] Message from my relay

I need help to solve this message: possible syn flooding on port 80. sending cookies. check snmp counters Port 80 is the ORPort of the relay. Thanks for reply 0xA09044BC.asc Description: application/pgp-keys ___ tor-relays mailing list

[tor-relays] Legal status of operating Tor exit in UK?

I run an exit node with an ISP who initially indicated they would not have a problem with Tor as long as I was transparent about what I was doing, and ran a sufficiently reduced exit policy. They have now sent me evidence of malicious traffic coming from the exit. I don't think they've had any

[tor-relays] Vultr disallowing exit relays

I have just been informed by Vultr that they now do not tolerate exit relays. The wiki[0] suggested they were a good host for exits, and vultr's staff confirmed to me at the start of the year that exits are fine. They appear to have changed their mind. [0]

Re: [tor-relays] Message from my relay

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Ok, good to hear you got it sorted! I suggest installing arm, as it can help with a lot. You could also access it locally, or set a password/cookie and use that instead. Best wishes on your Tor relay, Billy. On 08/09/2015 18:32, DARKNET.IT wrote: >

Re: [tor-relays] Legal status of operating Tor exit in UK?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, I am not from UK so I am also not familiar with the legislation there, but running an exit should be perfectly fine. Your ISP cannot "press" you to do anything! Only a govt. authority or law enforcement authority or judge can legally press

Re: [tor-relays] Legal status of operating Tor exit in UK?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Which ISP is it? I'm a fellow UK person, but I don't use a UK VPS/ISP for this. Tell them that you are an advocate for anonyminity, and that you refuse to monitor traffic. No ISP can force you to do that (they have black boxes to do this shit

Re: [tor-relays] Legal status of operating Tor exit in UK?

The ISP is Jump Networks, with whom I have a co-location in their Telehouse suite. I'd recommend them highly otherwise, but somewhat unexpectedly, they're using the bad traffic report as an opportunity to engage me in a rather philosophical debate about Tor. It's interesting to hear their opinions

Re: [tor-relays] Legal status of operating Tor exit in UK?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sorry to respond to this late, but some advice I received from my legal team not long ago might help on this. I apologise in advance that I won't be able to disclose the whole letter of it but some of the stuff contained within it is legally

Re: [tor-relays] Message from my relay

Are you using an old version of Tor? You should be on 0.2.x Even if you're not using a RasPi, this may help: http://tor.stackexchange.com/questions/6134/tor-dying-on-raspberry-pi-circuit-creation-storm-out-of-memory It seems that Tor kills itself due to memory issues... Or, you're getting

Re: [tor-relays] Experience hosting exit relay with Costa Rica Servers: crservers.com

On 9 September 2015 at 01:28, I wrote: > " we will have to suspend service. You will be immediately contacted about > any issue that arises." > > Doesn't their statement say they will only suspend the exit to talk to you > about what to do? I think that matches "not

Re: [tor-relays] Experience hosting exit relay with Costa Rica Servers: crservers.com

" we will have to suspend service. You will be immediately contacted about any issue that arises." Doesn't their statement say they will only suspend the exit to talk to you about what to do? Robert ___ tor-relays mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] Legal status of operating Tor exit in UK?

The server is theirs so they can say what happens on it.  You only use it with their agreement.You don't have to agree to anything if you don't want to but the alternative is to stop using their server.As it would be against TOR's reason for living to monitor traffic the choice is obvious.When

[tor-relays] Relay Stats

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I've sent and received almost 10GB and I've only been up for 2 days. I was first a exit relay, then non-exit (so many blue outbounds!) now I'm a exit relay again. Here's my ARM message: Tor's uptime is 1 day 18:00 hours, with 31 circuits open. I've

Re: [tor-relays] Message from my relay

Dear Billy, thanks for reply. The problem seems to be solved. My relay is only root and I haven't installed arm. I have only debian wheezy (server) and tor. Internet band is very good 100 Mb/s. I have made a test and the net in my misuration was 160 Mb/s. The server is a dual core with few ram

Re: [tor-relays] Experience hosting exit relay with Costa Rica Servers: crservers.com

I received the following response from them: > We do not discriminate on the use of any protocol among our customers. > Nevertheless, if we get complains or any type of pressure from public or > private > entities for illegal activity occurring in your server, we will have to > suspend >

Re: [tor-relays] Experience hosting exit relay with Costa Rica Servers: crservers.com

On 09/08/2015 12:14 PM, Patrick O'Doherty wrote: > I received the following response from them: > >> We do not discriminate on the use of any protocol among our customers. >> Nevertheless, if we get complains or any type of pressure from public or >> private >> entities for illegal activity