Re: [tor-relays] Don't use Google's DNS server

Right now I'm using Digital Ocean, but my previous provider experiences Hostwinds and Pulse (OVH) also have Google DNS as the default. On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:50 PM, ITechGeek wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Tristan wrote: > >> I

Re: [tor-relays] Don't use Google's DNS server

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Tristan wrote: > I really wish VPS services wouldn't use Google DNS by default. If not for > this e-mail, I would have been on Google's DNS for a while before I found > out. I actually haven't seen that before, what VPS provider do you

Re: [tor-relays] Don't use Google's DNS server

I really wish VPS services wouldn't use Google DNS by default. If not for this e-mail, I would have been on Google's DNS for a while before I found out. Maybe the Tor devs could add a warning if an exit is using Google DNS? Would that be acceptable? On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Toralf

Re: [tor-relays] cheap unmetered non-exit VPS offers

Markus Koch wrote: > exit allowed? I can vouch for www.stayon.no VPS with dedicated, unmetered 1 Gbps connection. 1 GB RAM / 1 CPU @ 2.6 GHz Price: 149 NOK/month (~ 16 EUR / 17 USD). Tor exit friendly. Their abuse departement will ask you to block destination IPs

Re: [tor-relays] Don't use Google's DNS server

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/28/2016 07:50 PM, nusenu wrote: > If you run an exit and find your relay fingerprint next to a Google AS If only a subset from the whole list is meant it would be helpful to provide an appropriate subset of that file for the purpose of this

Re: [tor-relays] Don't use Google's DNS server

phw released some scan data. If you run an exit and find your relay fingerprint next to a Google AS name on the list linked below you might want to change your DNS server settings. Note this list is based on data from May 2016 (so it does not necessarily represent the current situation).

Re: [tor-relays] cheap unmetered non-exit VPS offers

> > no, that is why I put "non-exit" in the subject of my email. > > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs#Italy1 > > And yes, their support is poor, but as long as your servers run you won't > need them. Looking it up: SEFLOW Avoid it. they say it's against Italian law

Re: [tor-relays] cheap unmetered non-exit VPS offers

There is also https://dataclub.biz <-- exit + bitcoin payment NL/SW/LV servers On July 28, 2016 3:41:04 PM GMT+02:00, tor relay wrote: > >> On July 28, 2016 at 2:48 PM Markus Koch >wrote: >> >> >> exit allowed? > >no, that is why I put

Re: [tor-relays] cheap unmetered non-exit VPS offers

> On July 28, 2016 at 2:48 PM Markus Koch wrote: > > > exit allowed? no, that is why I put "non-exit" in the subject of my email. https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs#Italy1 And yes, their support is poor, but as long as your servers run

Re: [tor-relays] cheap unmetered non-exit VPS offers

Just chatted with the Support and I highly doubt they are knowing what they are doing, anyway setup one exit relay and will report back after my first abuse mail. This will be fun :) btw: Jul 28 15:24:19.832 [warn] Failed to parse/validate config: Nickname 'niftychinchillarabbit' is wrong length

Re: [tor-relays] cheap unmetered non-exit VPS offers

exit allowed? 2016-07-28 13:59 GMT+02:00 tor relay : > > On July 28, 2016 at 9:11 AM Roman Mamedov wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 08:09:12 +0100 > "Louie Cardone-Noott" wrote: > > Am I right in thinking that even 2 TByte/month is

Re: [tor-relays] AWS abuse handling

On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 08:09:12 +0100 "Louie Cardone-Noott" wrote: > Am I right in thinking that even 2 TByte/month is fairly low? That's > only 6 Mbit/s average (whether that's 6/6 or 3/3 depends on their > accounting I suppose). That's correct, however I don't have any