Re: [tor-relays] Useful metrics for relay operators

> On 1 Sep 2016, at 13:36, I wrote: > > Did someone mention t-shirts? > > > When is the last time anyone got a t-shirt? I'm pretty sure Jon has been sending them out on a regular basis. (We're trying to automate the process a bit more.) If you want one, please

Re: [tor-relays] Useful metrics for relay operators

Did someone mention t-shirts? When is the last time anyone got a t-shirt? ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] New tor relay not showing up on Atlas

> On 1 Sep 2016, at 12:07, Marina Brown wrote: > > Hi All: > > I've set up a new relay and it is not showing up on Atlas. This is the > Log output. > > Sep 01 03:52:27.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 90%: Establishing a Tor circuit > Sep 01 03:52:27.000 [notice] Tor has

[tor-relays] New tor relay not showing up on Atlas

Hi All: I've set up a new relay and it is not showing up on Atlas. This is the Log output. Sep 01 03:52:27.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 90%: Establishing a Tor circuit Sep 01 03:52:27.000 [notice] Tor has successfully opened a circuit. Looks like client functionality is wor king. Sep 01

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

On 08/31/2016 04:39 PM, grarpamp wrote: > On 8/31/16, Green Dream wrote: >> Well said grarpamp. >> >>> there are plenty of other already existing, interesting, and >>> upcoming anonymous overlay networks for transporting IP, messaging, >>> storage and so on. >> >> Mind

Re: [tor-relays] Useful metrics for relay operators

> On 1 Sep 2016, at 02:51, Alison wrote: > > I'd like to hear directly from relay operators about what kinds of > metrics they might like to see involved in a project like this. Have you > achieved milestones with your relays that you wished Tor Project would > have given

Re: [tor-relays] newer version of tor

> yep how right you are, I tested it but it pulled in libsystemd for some > reason > and the whole point of moving to devuan was to get away from that > unneeded dependency. > > So I guess I have to compile it myself then!? Most autotooled software including Tor is easy to compile, so if whatever

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

On 8/31/16, Green Dream wrote: > Well said grarpamp. > >> there are plenty of other already existing, interesting, and >> upcoming anonymous overlay networks for transporting IP, messaging, >> storage and so on. > > Mind sharing some names here so I can research further?

Re: [tor-relays] Useful metrics for relay operators

> After Roger's recent checkin emails to this list, some of the folks from > the community and metrics teams have started to brainstorm ways that we > could use Onionoo data [1] to give better support and recognition to the > relay operators. For example, a weekly mail of all the relays that just

Re: [tor-relays] newer version of tor

I remember Ubuntu and other Debian-based systems moving from upstart to systemd. I don't know the details, but I know systemd manages services among other things. I'm not sure if systemd is actually required for Tor to run, so I guess compile it and see what happens. On Aug 31, 2016 4:14 PM,

Re: [tor-relays] newer version of tor

n 2016-08-31 15:06, Tristan wrote: The Tor Repository works fine on a Raspberry Pi 2, so I'm guessing it'll work on a 3. yep how right you are, I tested it but it pulled in libsystemd for some reason and the whole point of moving to devuan was to get away from that unneeded dependency. So

Re: [tor-relays] Wrong mode on /var/run/tor

On 2016-08-31 14:33, Peter Palfrader wrote: On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Alexander Dietrich wrote: When I checked, the /var/run/tor directory had the mode "rwxr-sr-x". After removing the permissions for "other", tor started without problems. This most likely means that you have a non-standard

[tor-relays] Useful metrics for relay operators

Hello all, After Roger's recent checkin emails to this list, some of the folks from the community and metrics teams have started to brainstorm ways that we could use Onionoo data [1] to give better support and recognition to the relay operators. For example, a weekly mail of all the relays that

Re: [tor-relays] newer version of tor

The Tor Repository works fine on a Raspberry Pi 2, so I'm guessing it'll work on a 3. On Aug 31, 2016 4:38 AM, "shraptor" wrote: > I am running an rpi3 with devuan. > > How to I get a more recent tor package on there? > > > Could I use https://deb.torproject.org or do I

Re: [tor-relays] Wrong mode on /var/run/tor

On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Alexander Dietrich wrote: > Hello, > > I just had a tor instance exit with these error messages: > > [warn] Failed to parse/validate config: Failed to bind one of the listener > ports. > [err] Reading config failed--see warnings above. For usage, try -h. > [warn] Restart

[tor-relays] newer version of tor

I am running an rpi3 with devuan. How to I get a more recent tor package on there? Could I use https://deb.torproject.org or do I have to setup a tool chain for armhf and build it from source? /scooby ___ tor-relays mailing list

[tor-relays] Wrong mode on /var/run/tor

Hello, I just had a tor instance exit with these error messages: [warn] Failed to parse/validate config: Failed to bind one of the listener ports. [err] Reading config failed--see warnings above. For usage, try -h. [warn] Restart failed (config error?). Exiting. Above that, the log contains