Re: [tor-relays] Tor bridge and obfs4proxy

> On 5 Sep 2016, at 11:49, Arisbe wrote: > > I need someone's bridge experience. I had an HD crash and lost one of my Tor > bridges. So, I'm rebuilding on a leased VPS. First I tried with Debian 8 > and then with ubuntu 16.04 when Debian didn't work. With both operating >

Re: [tor-relays] Tor and Diplomatic Immunity

> On 5 Sep 2016, at 11:31, Mirimir wrote: > > On 09/04/2016 09:11 AM, Kenneth Freeman wrote: >> Do embassies and consulates run Tor nodes? AFAIK no studies have been >> done on this, but diplomatic immunity and Tor would seem to be a match >> made in Heaven. > > Well, they

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-relays-universities] Legal issues relevant to UK

> * Duncan Guthrie schrieb am 2016-09-01 um 01:09 Uhr: >> I'm hoping to run a Tor relay here at a University in the UK. >> Is there anyone here who might have some experience with this in the >> past? I have been researching legal issues but information is >> extremely sparse (mostly relating to

Re: [tor-relays] Useful metrics for relay operators

> On 4 Sep 2016, at 22:55, pa011 wrote: > > > > Am 01.09.2016 um 05:39 schrieb teor: >> >>> On 1 Sep 2016, at 13:36, I wrote: >>> >>> Did someone mention t-shirts? >>> >>> >>> When is the last time anyone got a t-shirt? >> >> I'm pretty sure Jon

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 68, Issue 12

> Am 04.09.2016 um 06:52 schrieb daniel boone: >> Ok, 1st on to MATT >> "I missed your SOCKS question." >> Well that doesnt matter because I took you advice on the first reply you >> sent explaing things so I commented all again as suggested. So all is well >> now on that part of the torrc

Re: [tor-relays] Why can't I see more traffic? (is my banana too weak?)

> On 4 Sep 2016, at 04:35, Farid Joubbi wrote: > > It seems as if Cpu1 is almost idle most of the time. > Cpu0 is somewhere between 5 and 20. > This is a rather high snapshot: > > %Cpu0 : 17.2 us, 2.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 79.5 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 1.3 si, 0.0 > st > %Cpu1 : 2.4

[tor-relays] Tor bridge and obfs4proxy

I need someone's bridge experience. I had an HD crash and lost one of my Tor bridges. So, I'm rebuilding on a leased VPS. First I tried with Debian 8 and then with ubuntu 16.04 when Debian didn't work. With both operating systems I get a warning message when I start Tor. Tor is the latest

Re: [tor-relays] Tor and Diplomatic Immunity

On 09/04/2016 09:11 AM, Kenneth Freeman wrote: > Do embassies and consulates run Tor nodes? AFAIK no studies have been > done on this, but diplomatic immunity and Tor would seem to be a match > made in Heaven. Well, they need uplinks, right? I doubt that diplomatic immunity forces ISPs to serve

Re: [tor-relays] Guard vs Exit Bandwidth

> On 3 Sep 2016, at 03:53, Tristan wrote: > > But hidden service traffic makes up about 0.01% of Tor traffic. 0.9 Gbps / 75 Gbps = 1.2% > Total is about 75Gb/s: http://rougmnvswfsmd4dq.onion/bandwidth.html > > Hidden services are about 900Mb/s: >

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-relays-universities] Legal issues relevant to UK

X-Post from tor-relays-universities@ I ran some relays at Geman universities in the past. I guess my experiences won't help here. Maybe someone on tor-relays has experience with running a relay at an UK university, so I send this mail to tor-relays@ too. * Duncan Guthrie schrieb am 2016-09-01 um

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 68, Issue 14

To change your mailing-list preferences, you can simply visit https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays. On the other hand, you can also stay with the digest, if you don't plan on posting here regularly. Setting up a relay can be a lot of work, especially if you've never

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 68, Issue 15

someone mention t-shirts? I got my weather notification in January, recieved the t-shirt one week ago. Thanks! Sebastian -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPG

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 68, Issue 14

r using anything to set it back. Right with the MB too.}* > > I'll check back in the morn. 21 hrs today is enough for my butt. C/Ya > > *[snip quote of digest]* > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https:

[tor-relays] Tor and Diplomatic Immunity

Do embassies and consulates run Tor nodes? AFAIK no studies have been done on this, but diplomatic immunity and Tor would seem to be a match made in Heaven. 0xDD79757F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, 3 questions on torcc file

On 09/03/2016 05:35 PM, jensm1 wrote: > I agree to everything Matt said. > > A good rule of thumb for tor configuration is "leave everything at > default, unless you've got a reason to change it". I concur. Generally speaking you really don't have to get under the hood much. Tor's ready to

Re: [tor-relays] Useful metrics for relay operators

Am 01.09.2016 um 05:36 schrieb I: > Did someone mention t-shirts? I got my weather notification in January, recieved the t-shirt one week ago. Thanks! Sebastian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 68, Issue 12

You're right, of course. The technically correct way would be to filter by the List-Id field and thunderbird supports this. I actually didn't know about this header field till now, thanks for pointing it out! But as you said, most webmails are crap (gmail apparently supports it, but not directly).

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 68, Issue 12

On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:17 AM, jensm1 wrote: > you can then configure your inbox to > put everything containing [tor-relays] into its own folder This is non ideal as it continues the poor notion that bloating everyone's subject lines with, currently 13, characters of non content

Re: [tor-relays] BeagleBoard-X15

Hi, the BeagleBoard-X15 seems to be in the last phase of development/certification. We'll probably have to wait a bit until it finally gets released. As to alternatives: I'd be interested in these, too. Jens Am 04.09.2016 um 11:05 schrieb jchase: > Hello, > At least a year ago someone

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 68, Issue 12

Hi Daniel One thing first: If you want to actively participate on this mailing list on a regular basis, it would be best if you switched your mailing-list-setting from digest to the actual mails (you can then either configure your inbox to put everything containing [tor-relays] into its own

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 68, Issue 12-UPDATE

; > > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.tor