Re: [tor-relays] ExitPolicy reject 184.107.0.0/16* funio.com

Okay, Its 6am and I need more coffee. Sorry, my bad! Thank you very much! Markus 2016-10-28 6:05 GMT+02:00 grarpamp : > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Markus Koch > wrote: >> I tried to reject the IP >> space of funio but Tor is telling me its

Re: [tor-relays] ExitPolicy reject 184.107.0.0/16* funio.com

You cant, Tor will give out a error msg: Oct 28 07:07:32.653 [warn] Malformed mask on address range "184.107.0.0/16*"; rejecting. Oct 28 07:07:32.654 [warn] Couldn't parse line "184.107.0.0/16*". Dropping Oct 28 07:07:32.654 [warn] Malformed policy 'reject 184.107.0.0/16*'. Discarding entire

Re: [tor-relays] ExitPolicy reject 184.107.0.0/16* funio.com

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Markus Koch wrote: > I tried to reject the IP > space of funio but Tor is telling me its not allowed. Why? Your syntax is probably wrong. Search and read the "ExitPolicy" section in the manpage for tor(1). You probably want...

Re: [tor-relays] ExitPolicy reject 184.107.0.0/16* funio.com

I am getting them as well. I haven't blocked yet, are you suggesting we should? > On Oct 27, 2016, at 22:58, Markus Koch wrote: > > Getting abuse mass mails on nearly all exist in the last hours: > > The following intrusion attempts were detected: > >

[tor-relays] ExitPolicy reject 184.107.0.0/16* funio.com

Getting abuse mass mails on nearly all exist in the last hours: The following intrusion attempts were detected: ./pilipia/pilipiak.com:188.166.63.113 - - [27/Oct/2016:18:06:35 -0400] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 5734 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1"

Re: [tor-relays] LLC vis-à-vis Nonprofit

On 10/26/2016 06:58 PM, Nicholas Merrill wrote: > Hi Kenneth > > I am with a New York state non-profit organization that runs a number of > exits. I am not a lawyer, but I have surely spent years discussing > these and other related issues with many lawyers. Good to know. Keeps me and my

Re: [tor-relays] Abuses: Suspicious botnet ramnit attack

No. Thats my problem too, around 90% of my abuse mails are bot related and you cant do anything about it. Markus 2016-10-27 20:24 GMT+02:00 pa011 : > Hi, > > got the abuse below on three different exits. Anybody having any idea what to > do and how to possibly to stop this in the

[tor-relays] Abuses: Suspicious botnet ramnit attack

Hi, got the abuse below on three different exits. Anybody having any idea what to do and how to possibly to stop this in the future? Thanks Paul CERT-EU has received information regarding an infected IP belonging to your network, which may have security problems. The information regarding the

Re: [tor-relays] Really bad ISP

Thanks everyone for your assistance. I'm looking out for an ISP **and** putting all this information into practice ASAP. I'll be glad to share notes, whenever, again. Lluís Julien ROBIN: > Hi, > > You can check if there is no physical problem on your line, just in case > ! Connect to your

Re: [tor-relays] LLC vis-à-vis Nonprofit

On 10/27/2016 02:22 AM, Kenneth Freeman wrote: > An Idaho nonprofit has expressed guarded interest in Tor. Ideally I'd > like them to run an exit node without fuss or bother, but the Tor > Project's Tips on Running an Exit Node only covers limited liability > corporations (LLCs) Which guide is

Re: [tor-relays] most (>57% cwfr) of the tor network still vulnerable to CVE-2016-8860 - update your relay!

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Zack Weinberg wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Peter Palfrader > wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Alan wrote: > >> 0.2.5.12 is the latest version from the repo. Im assuming I should pull > >> down the source and compile it. > > > > Depends on