Re: [tor-relays] manual vs. automated updates

Thanks, Teor and SuperSluether. That's just what I needed, that TorProject:trusty syntax. Looks like it's working. -Greg On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 5:34 AM, SuperSluether wrote: > For Debian-based systems, on the top of > "/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades" > my

Re: [tor-relays] assign_to_cpuworker failed. Ignoring.

2016-11-01 12:03 GMT-03:00, teor : > >> On 2 Nov. 2016, at 01:56, Felix wrote: >> ... >> >> My log says: >> Oct 19 01:04:52.527 [notice] Read configuration file >> "/usr/local/etc/tor/torrc". >> Oct 19 01:04:52.566 [notice] Opening OR listener on

Re: [tor-relays] Blocking Domains

> On 2 Nov. 2016, at 02:01, Tristan wrote: > > So what mask would I use then? I've been trying to wrap my head around it, > but I just don't understand what /24 means, or how it's different from /27 or > any other number. You have a list in IP-IP (IP range) format,

Re: [tor-relays] Blocking Domains

Wow this is confusing. If I'm understanding this correctly, 0.0.0.0/24 would mean any address from 0.0.0.0 to 0.0.0.255, correct? On Nov 1, 2016 10:01 AM, "Tristan" wrote: > So what mask would I use then? I've been trying to wrap my head around it, > but I just don't

Re: [tor-relays] Blocking Domains

So what mask would I use then? I've been trying to wrap my head around it, but I just don't understand what /24 means, or how it's different from /27 or any other number. On Nov 1, 2016 9:58 AM, "teor" wrote: > > > On 2 Nov. 2016, at 01:54, SuperSluether

Re: [tor-relays] Blocking Domains

> On 2 Nov. 2016, at 01:54, SuperSluether wrote: > > So, I tried putting the IPs into my exit policy like this: > > xx.xx.xx.xx-xx.xx.xx:* > > But Tor doesn't like that syntax. What's the correct way to block address > ranges in the exit policy? The man page is your

Re: [tor-relays] assign_to_cpuworker failed. Ignoring.

Am 01.11.2016 um 13:19 schrieb Vinícius Zavam: 2016-10-31 20:22 GMT-03:00, Felix : Am 31.10.2016 um 23:40 schrieb Vinícius Zavam: 2016-10-19 2:30 GMT-03:00, teor : On 19 Oct. 2016, at 16:25, Felix wrote: Hi

Re: [tor-relays] Blocking Domains

So, I tried putting the IPs into my exit policy like this: xx.xx.xx.xx-xx.xx.xx:* But Tor doesn't like that syntax. What's the correct way to block address ranges in the exit policy? On 11/01/2016 07:32 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote: On 01.11.2016 12:56, hwertiout695 wrote:

Re: [tor-relays] manual vs. automated updates

For Debian-based systems, on the top of "/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades" my file looks like this: Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins { "${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-security"; "${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-updates"; //"${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-proposed";

Re: [tor-relays] Blocking Domains

On 01.11.2016 12:56, hwertiout695 wrote: > https://whois.arin.net/rest/org/PANEL-2/nets [...] This appears to be the most comprehensive list of assigned networks I have seen so far for panelboxmanager.com; thank you. -Ralph ___ tor-relays mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] Tor bandwith question

On 2016-11-01 at 13:29, SuperSluether wrote: > Well, Tor-relay-debian says 250KBps (bytes): > https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-relay-debian.html.en > > But Tor-doc-relay says 2Mbps (bits): > https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-doc-relay.html.en > Which is exactly the same, so it's ok :)

Re: [tor-relays] Interrogated by Finnish police for alleged idendity crimes, fraud and attempts of fraud

Agree, trying to explain why people like Tor operators and/or volunteers on WGC are giving time, network/cpu computing, money... to preserve and help human rights, health... can be a good way. Trying to show them what the Tor network is, why, the goal... the easiest possible, because many of them

Re: [tor-relays] Tor bandwith question

Well, Tor-relay-debian says 250KBps (bytes): https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-relay-debian.html.en But Tor-doc-relay says 2Mbps (bits): https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-doc-relay.html.en On 10/31/2016 11:58 PM, ane...@tutanota.de wrote: In order to clarify this once and for all: If I

Re: [tor-relays] Interrogated by Finnish police for alleged idendity crimes, fraud and attempts of fraud

Hi Volker, A French text of law also exists for the following protection (following lines) but there is some others laws that are making it not completely clear, unfortunately. You're not responsible about information that have been transmitted trough your Internet access if : -You're not

Re: [tor-relays] Tor bandwith question

> On 1 Nov. 2016, at 23:12, Louie Cardone-Noott wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Nov 2016, at 11:42 AM, teor wrote: >> >>> On 1 Nov. 2016, at 15:58, wrote: >>> >>> In order to clarify this once and for all: If I setup a Tor relay with 200 >>>

Re: [tor-relays] assign_to_cpuworker failed. Ignoring.

2016-10-31 20:22 GMT-03:00, Felix : > > > Am 31.10.2016 um 23:40 schrieb Vinícius Zavam: >> 2016-10-19 2:30 GMT-03:00, teor : >>> On 19 Oct. 2016, at 16:25, Felix wrote: Hi everybody May be someone

Re: [tor-relays] Tor bandwith question

On Tue, 1 Nov 2016, at 11:42 AM, teor wrote: > > > On 1 Nov. 2016, at 15:58, wrote: > > > > In order to clarify this once and for all: If I setup a Tor relay with 200 > > kBps, do I slow down the Tor network? What amount of bandwith is needed in > >

Re: [tor-relays] manual vs. automated updates

> On 1 Nov. 2016, at 16:44, Greg wrote: > > Hi, > I'm very interested in setting up unattended upgrades for tor. I tried > searching for instructions on how to do it. But the only instructions I could > really find didn't work (on the Library Freedom git project). > How do

Re: [tor-relays] Blocking Domains

Hi Ralph, Ralph Seichter schrieb am Di., 1. Nov. 2016 um 12:37 Uhr: > Does anybody have a suggestion on how best to figure out which address > ranges are owned by panelboxmanager.com? Complaints seem to come in for > all sorts of addresses. > `whois 72.55.186.5`

Re: [tor-relays] Blocking Domains

On 2016-11-01 at 12:37, Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 01.11.2016 12:27, Diarmaid McManus wrote: > >> is there a way to dynamically update the exit policy as a relay is >> running? > > There is. Change configuration file on-disk, then send a HUP signal to > Tor process. > > Does anybody have a

Re: [tor-relays] Blocking Domains

On 01.11.2016 12:27, Diarmaid McManus wrote: > is there a way to dynamically update the exit policy as a relay is > running? There is. Change configuration file on-disk, then send a HUP signal to Tor process. Does anybody have a suggestion on how best to figure out which address ranges are

Re: [tor-relays] Blocking Domains

I wouldn't recommend blocking at the DNS level, as this could flag your exit with a BADEXIT for modifying traffic. The current official way to do this is through the exit policy, but this is in a configuration file. *Relay Operators*: is there a way to dynamically update the exit policy as a

Re: [tor-relays] Stats not updated for several days?

Thank you! > On Nov 1, 2016, at 05:17, Karsten Loesing wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi everyone, > > can you check once again? > > There was a problem with the data-collecting service that silently > died on October 30 at around

Re: [tor-relays] Stats not updated for several days?

On 1 November 2016 at 10:16, Karsten Loesing wrote: > Hi everyone, > > can you check once again? > > There was a problem with the data-collecting service that silently > died on October 30 at around 23:00 UTC. I have been working on that > problem for an hour or two, and

Re: [tor-relays] Stats not updated for several days?

On 2016-11-01 at 11:16, Karsten Loesing wrote: > Hi everyone, > > can you check once again? > > There was a problem with the data-collecting service that silently > died on October 30 at around 23:00 UTC. I have been working on that > problem for an hour or two, and it should be resolved by

Re: [tor-relays] Stats not updated for several days?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi everyone, can you check once again? There was a problem with the data-collecting service that silently died on October 30 at around 23:00 UTC. I have been working on that problem for an hour or two, and it should be resolved by now. Please

Re: [tor-relays] Stats not updated for several days?

Same here. Sent from my iPad > On 1 Nov 2016, at 10:42, Michael Armbruster wrote: > >> On 2016-11-01 at 10:34, Pascal Terjan wrote: >> For example >> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/20462CBA5DA4C2D963567D17D0B7249718114A68 >> says uptime is 12 days and current version

Re: [tor-relays] Stats not updated for several days?

On 2016-11-01 at 10:34, Pascal Terjan wrote: > For example > https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/20462CBA5DA4C2D963567D17D0B7249718114A68 > says uptime is 12 days and current version is 0.2.6.10 but I upgraded > the machine and updated tor to 0.2.8.9 over a day ago: > I currently have

Re: [tor-relays] Interrogated by Finnish police for alleged idendity crimes, fraud and attempts of fraud

When reading this i am glad i live in germany. We still have some laws which protect operators of TOR-Exits :) https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tmg/__5.html https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tmg/__8.html https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tmg/__15.html (perhaps try to translate them with