Re: [tor-relays] how to distribute pgp public key?

On Dec 7, 2016 1:28 AM, "Univibe" wrote: If I want to include a reference to my public PGP key on Atlas using the ContactInfo field on my relays, what's the best way to do it? Should I upload my key to some of the public keyservers and then list the fingerprint on Atlas?

[tor-relays] how to distribute pgp public key?

If I want to include a reference to my public PGP key on Atlas using the ContactInfo field on my relays, what's the best way to do it? Should I upload my key to some of the public keyservers and then list the fingerprint on Atlas? If so which keyservers are recommended? I had a thought to

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

I can just imagine someone panting while dragging a sub-$35 old desktop computer up the stairs after physically searching for it in a nearby junkyard. A considerable level of destitution and a commendable commitment to the cause of Tor would be required. -Original Message- From:

Re: [tor-relays] Circuits from Tor relay?

That's a thorough and useful answer. Thank you Tim. -Original Message- From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of teor Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 12:12 AM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Circuits from Tor relay?

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 00:36:15 + Duncan Guthrie wrote: > My original figure may have been... somewhat off. With different models > they may have updated the network hardware. They did not. All models with Ethernet use the same SMSC LAN9514 chip. > A more general point is

Re: [tor-relays] Call for Tor Fallback Directories

> On 7 Dec. 2016, at 11:38, Tobias Sachs wrote: > > Hey teor, > > my relay 5665A3904C89E22E971305EE8C1997BCA4123C69 is according to your log > [4] black and whitelisted. But it is only in the whitelist from you [1] > My second relay

Re: [tor-relays] Call for Tor Fallback Directories

Hey teor, my relay 5665A3904C89E22E971305EE8C1997BCA4123C69 is according to your log [4] black and whitelisted. But it is only in the whitelist from you [1] My second relay B567E8E39641F61091C1F2CAAAF73D3D1BF9CFE1 is according to [4] blacklisted but also not in [2]. I hope you can clarify this

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

On 06/12/16 21:10, SuperSluether wrote: I don't know the actual numbers for the Raspberry Pi 1, I was just quoting from Duncan: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2016-December/011182.html I was told this figure by a friend who tried networking "stuff" on a Pi. From personal

Re: [tor-relays] Call for Tor Fallback Directories

> On 7 Dec. 2016, at 11:04, l3thal.inject...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hey Tim, > > I believe my relay may already be on the fallback list. If not, please > feel free to include it. It has been up, fast and stable for well over > 2 years and will up for the indefinite future at this time. Thanks, I

Re: [tor-relays] Call for Tor Fallback Directories

Hey Tim, I believe my relay may already be on the fallback list. If not, please feel free to include it. It has been up, fast and stable for well over 2 years and will up for the indefinite future at this time. Thanks On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 5:44 AM, teor wrote: > -BEGIN

Re: [tor-relays] Circuits from Tor relay?

> On 7 Dec. 2016, at 08:07, Rana wrote: > > Arm reports that my relay has 15 circuits connected to my (middle only) > relay. Some of the circuits have one middle relay and some of them have two. > All the circuits are FROM my relay to exit nodes, and all have the same

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 22:00:20 +0100 diffusae wrote: > Well, I can read and also now the translation from Bits to Bytes. > But I am not sure about your value of the maximum network capacity. > > That's the iperf3 measurement of a Raspberry Pi 1 Model B+: > > [ ID] Interval

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

Ahh, ok. It looks like, that should be a bit more that 1 MB/s. Regards, On 06.12.2016 22:10, SuperSluether wrote: > I don't know the actual numbers for the Raspberry Pi 1, I was just > quoting from Duncan: > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2016-December/011182.html > > > On

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

I don't know the actual numbers for the Raspberry Pi 1, I was just quoting from Duncan: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2016-December/011182.html On 12/06/2016 03:00 PM, diffusae wrote: Well, I can read and also now the translation from Bits to Bytes. But I am not sure

[tor-relays] Circuits from Tor relay?

Arm reports that my relay has 15 circuits connected to my (middle only) relay. Some of the circuits have one middle relay and some of them have two. All the circuits are FROM my relay to exit nodes, and all have the same guard (first) relay. My relay has a small number of inbound connections and

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

Well, I can read and also now the translation from Bits to Bytes. But I am not sure about your value of the maximum network capacity. That's the iperf3 measurement of a Raspberry Pi 1 Model B+: [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 83.6 MBytes 8.36

Re: [tor-relays] network diversity with freeBSD - solved

Hi Tim! Thanks a lot for your hint. I've changed it. I'd recognized the public IPs with arm, but didn't know the circumstances. Now it should be in a more secure mode, than before. Regards, On 05.12.2016 23:49, teor wrote: > >> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 08:32, diffusae

Re: [tor-relays] relays with dynamic IP - here Rasp2

Hi! That's from today: rx | tx |total| avg. rate +-+-+--- today 6,26 GiB |5,21 GiB | 11,47 GiB | 1,27 Mbit/s It's just a "low" bandwidth, but this depends on the

Re: [tor-relays] relays with dynamic IP - here Rasp2

Am 06.12.2016 um 18:16 schrieb Rana: > -Original Message- > From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf > Of pa011 > Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 1:24 AM > To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

Again, bits or bytes. I can't believe I'm repeating myself, don't you people read? The ORIGINAL (version 1) Raspberry Pi had a max of 1 MegaBYTE. 1 MegaBYTE = 8 megaBITS Obviously other factors limit performance, but looking at just the maximum network capacity of a Raspberry Pi 1, it could

Re: [tor-relays] Updating wiki - good bad isps

> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 21:40, heartsucker wrote: > > If you attempt to edit the wiki, this error shows up: > > Submission rejected as potential spam > >Content contained these blacklisted patterns: 'http:', > '(?i)(call|customer|technical).?support' > > Since

Re: [tor-relays] Updating wiki - good bad isps

If you attempt to edit the wiki, this error shows up: Submission rejected as potential spam Content contained these blacklisted patterns: 'http:', '(?i)(call|customer|technical).?support' Since these patters already exist in the wiki, I can't make updates. -h On 12/06/2016 11:33 AM, teor

Re: [tor-relays] Updating wiki - good bad isps

> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 21:15, Sec INT wrote: > > Hi > > Does anyone know a contact for updating the wiki page for good bad isps - im > using five of them and one is not doing what is advertised - i.e. Shutting > off an exit node each time a spam abuse emailer asks them to

[tor-relays] Updating wiki - good bad isps

Hi Does anyone know a contact for updating the wiki page for good bad isps - im using five of them and one is not doing what is advertised - i.e. Shutting off an exit node each time a spam abuse emailer asks them to despite there being little evidence to back up their claims regards Mark B