Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

2017-10-11 Thread Dylan Issa 
What the fuck I didn’t even encrypt it >.>
What I said was:
Did you set MyFamily using nicknames of the key? 
Because if nickname, change it to key is basically what it’s saying.
> On Oct 10, 2017, at 8:38 PM, grarpamp  wrote:
> 
>> and pgpdump says:
>> Dylan, you seem to have encrypted this to 
> 
> Should have used throw-keyids ;)
> And/or it could be a proof...
> 
>> (pgp/gpg usability ftw)
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Just got my first Abuse email :-)

2017-10-11 Thread Paul Templeton 

Thanks Roman,

> I believe in such case you are supposed to reply to your provider
I will


> There was a mini discussion recently on that, with the general consensus
> seeming to be that keeping it open is more trouble than it's worth.
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2017-October/013188.html
I'll drop port 22

Regards,

Paul
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Just got my first Abuse email :-)

2017-10-11 Thread Roman Mamedov 
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:38:22 + (UTC)
Paul Templeton  wrote:

> It makes me happy but alas it was forwarded to me by the provider and didn't 
> include an email address... so now I can not reply, SIGH

I believe in such case you are supposed to reply to your provider, usually to
indicate that the problem the abuse report relates to "has been dealt with" and
will not repeat. In case of a Tor Exit you cannot guarantee that, aside from
removing port 22 from your exit policy.

> Question: this has come from port 22 usage - how important is this port to 
> the general population? Thoughts...

There was a mini discussion recently on that, with the general consensus
seeming to be that keeping it open is more trouble than it's worth.
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2017-October/013188.html

-- 
With respect,
Roman
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Just got my first Abuse email :-)

2017-10-11 Thread Volker Mink 
I created a new Exit some days ago and only allowed Ports 53, 80, 443 for Exit. 
Last Provider shut down my Exit because of many complaints. 

> Am 11.10.2017 um 11:38 schrieb Paul Templeton :
> 
> It makes me happy but alas it was forwarded to me by the provider and didn't 
> include an email address... so now I can not reply, SIGH
> 
> Question: this has come from port 22 usage - how important is this port to 
> the general population? Thoughts...
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Paul
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] Just got my first Abuse email :-)

2017-10-11 Thread Paul Templeton 
It makes me happy but alas it was forwarded to me by the provider and didn't 
include an email address... so now I can not reply, SIGH

Question: this has come from port 22 usage - how important is this port to the 
general population? Thoughts...

Regards,

Paul

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays