Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

2017-10-12 Thread Roman Mamedov 
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 21:01:55 +0100 (BST)
Dylan Issa  wrote:

> Maybe they're truncated, but they still need to start with a $

If you would just read the manual page, you would gather that $ is optional.
> 
> On 12 October 2017 at 20:09 Sebastian Hahn  wrote:
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> On 12. Oct 2017, at 20:43, Scott Bennett  wrote:
> teor  wrote:
> 
> On 12 Oct 2017, at 13:21, Toralf F?rster  wrote:
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> On 10/11/2017 10:08 AM, Dylan Issa wrote:
> Did you set MyFamily using nicknames of the key?
> Because if nickname, change it to key is basically what it?s saying.
> 
> No,
> 
> both Tor processes share this common config file:
> 
> grep -i famil /etc/tor/torrc*/*
> 
> /etc/tor/torrc.d/00_common:MyFamily 
> 1AF72E8906E6C49481A791A6F8F84F8DFEBBB2BA,6EABEBF38CE7E3DF672C4DB01383606FE3EB2215
> 
> Doessn't each fingerprint need to start with a $ character? Otherwise
> it's just a really long nickname, right?
> 
> No; nicknames are at most 20 characters long.
> 
> Cheers
> Sebastian
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


-- 
With respect,
Roman
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

2017-10-12 Thread Dylan Issa 

Maybe they're truncated, but they still need to start with a $On 12 October 2017 at 20:09 Sebastian Hahn  wrote:Hi there,On 12. Oct 2017, at 20:43, Scott Bennett  wrote:teor  wrote:On 12 Oct 2017, at 13:21, Toralf F?rster  wrote:-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA256On 10/11/2017 10:08 AM, Dylan Issa wrote:Did you set MyFamily using nicknames of the key?Because if nickname, change it to key is basically what it?s saying.No,both Tor processes share this common config file:grep -i famil /etc/tor/torrc*/*/etc/tor/torrc.d/00_common:MyFamily 1AF72E8906E6C49481A791A6F8F84F8DFEBBB2BA,6EABEBF38CE7E3DF672C4DB01383606FE3EB2215Doessn't each fingerprint need to start with a $ character? Otherwiseit's just a really long nickname, right?No; nicknames are at most 20 characters long.CheersSebastian___tor-relays mailing listtor-relays@lists.torproject.orghttps://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
 
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

2017-10-12 Thread Toralf Förster 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 10/12/2017 08:43 PM, Scott Bennett wrote:
>  Doessn't each fingerprint need to start with a $ character?  Otherwise
> it's just a really long nickname, right?
That entry worked fine for eons and is realized fine, eg.:

https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/1AF72E8906E6C49481A791A6F8F84F8DFEBBB2BA


- -- 
Toralf
PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iI0EAREIADUWIQQaN2+ZSp0CbxPiTc/E6s3eAHbpTgUCWd/GJRccdG9yYWxmLmZv
ZXJzdGVyQGdteC5kZQAKCRDE6s3eAHbpTuO3AP9tUDH5NtsF1Dlf1LhxQxnktvP0
CHBdCiiKKjAWv4IgTgD+LWAoyeoZpJuDqClaLY/CFyc7GU5qVhJczjRS3+xZC28=
=bTkD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

2017-10-12 Thread Sebastian Hahn 
Hi there,

> On 12. Oct 2017, at 20:43, Scott Bennett  wrote:
> teor  wrote:
>>> On 12 Oct 2017, at 13:21, Toralf F?rster  wrote:
>>> 
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA256
>>> 
 On 10/11/2017 10:08 AM, Dylan Issa wrote:
 Did you set MyFamily using nicknames of the key? 
 Because if nickname, change it to key is basically what it?s saying.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> No,
>>> 
>>> both Tor processes share this common config file:
>>> 
>>> grep -i famil /etc/tor/torrc*/*
>>> 
>>> /etc/tor/torrc.d/00_common:MyFamily 
>>> 1AF72E8906E6C49481A791A6F8F84F8DFEBBB2BA,6EABEBF38CE7E3DF672C4DB01383606FE3EB2215
> 
> Doessn't each fingerprint need to start with a $ character?  Otherwise
> it's just a really long nickname, right?

No; nicknames are at most 20 characters long.

Cheers
Sebastian
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

2017-10-12 Thread Scott Bennett 
teor  wrote:

>
> > On 12 Oct 2017, at 13:21, Toralf F?rster  wrote:
> > 
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> > 
> >> On 10/11/2017 10:08 AM, Dylan Issa wrote:
> >> Did you set MyFamily using nicknames of the key? 
> >> Because if nickname, change it to key is basically what it?s saying.
> > 
> > 
> > No,
> > 
> > both Tor processes share this common config file:
> > 
> > grep -i famil /etc/tor/torrc*/*
> > 
> > /etc/tor/torrc.d/00_common:MyFamily 
> > 1AF72E8906E6C49481A791A6F8F84F8DFEBBB2BA,6EABEBF38CE7E3DF672C4DB01383606FE3EB2215

 Doessn't each fingerprint need to start with a $ character?  Otherwise
it's just a really long nickname, right?


  Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet:   bennett at sdf.org   *xor*   bennett at freeshell.org  *
**
* "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good  *
* objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
* -- a standing army."   *
*-- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
**
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

2017-10-12 Thread teor 

> On 12 Oct 2017, at 13:21, Toralf Förster  wrote:
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
> 
>> On 10/11/2017 10:08 AM, Dylan Issa wrote:
>> Did you set MyFamily using nicknames of the key? 
>> Because if nickname, change it to key is basically what it’s saying.
> 
> 
> No,
> 
> both Tor processes share this common config file:
> 
> grep -i famil /etc/tor/torrc*/*
> 
> /etc/tor/torrc.d/00_common:MyFamily 
> 1AF72E8906E6C49481A791A6F8F84F8DFEBBB2BA,6EABEBF38CE7E3DF672C4DB01383606FE3EB2215
> 
> 
> - -- 
> Toralf
> PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> iI0EAREIADUWIQQaN2+ZSp0CbxPiTc/E6s3eAHbpTgUCWd+ktBccdG9yYWxmLmZv
> ZXJzdGVyQGdteC5kZQAKCRDE6s3eAHbpTh4NAP9uSainGjgdwBHLJMHSeNUvTOoc
> uvr0Ed3XmgbB0nALwQD/fdC/CocWnBX5188foRlNLjH1olTl9pXSSQdX344tYWU=
> =6rJz
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Please log a bug on the bug tracker, and we'll look into it.

T
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Just got my first Abuse email :-)

2017-10-12 Thread Dr Gerard Bulger 
So far I have had no abuse emails or complaints after two months on a new 
server, using the longer suggested reduced policy list, but I do exclude 80, 
which seems safer but limits the role as an exit. But 443 open. I closed other 
potential abuse ports such as 22, 8080, 5900.

It's not the complaints that worry me, but the reaction of the ISP with any 
complaints, so best avoided until I can afford to be my own ISP.

What are the risks of abuse reports in opening up a wide range of high port 
numbers as an exit say 20,000-50,000? 

Gerry
 

-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of 
Cristian Consonni
Sent: 12 October 2017 11:10
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Just got my first Abuse email :-)

Hi Paul,

On 11/10/2017 13:28, Paul Templeton wrote:
>> I believe in such case you are supposed to reply to your provider
> I will

For my experience, I do the same.

>> There was a mini discussion recently on that, with the general 
>> consensus seeming to be that keeping it open is more trouble than it's worth.
>> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2017-October/013188
>> .html
> I'll drop port 22

You may be interested in these Reduced Exit Policies:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy

there are several of them which are progressively strictest and stricter.

Cristian
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Just got my first Abuse email :-)

2017-10-12 Thread Cristian Consonni 
Hi Paul,

On 11/10/2017 13:28, Paul Templeton wrote:
>> I believe in such case you are supposed to reply to your provider
> I will

For my experience, I do the same.

>> There was a mini discussion recently on that, with the general consensus
>> seeming to be that keeping it open is more trouble than it's worth.
>> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2017-October/013188.html
> I'll drop port 22

You may be interested in these Reduced Exit Policies:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy

there are several of them which are progressively strictest and stricter.

Cristian
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Revert back to a stable build of Tor from an alpha

2017-10-12 Thread Lucas Werkmeister 
On 12.10.2017 11:57, nusenu wrote:
>
> nusenu:
>> Jacki M:
>>> How do I revert back to a stable build of Tor from an alpha? Im running Tor 
>>> 0.3.2.2-alpha and need to revert back to Tor 0.3.1.7.
>>> Im running Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS.
>> this should be easy:
>>
>> apt remove tor
>> adjust sources.list to point to the stable repository (remove the
>> experimental repo)
> +
> apt update
>> apt install tor

You probably want to back up your torrc too, I’m not sure if that’s kept
when the package is removed.


___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Revert back to a stable build of Tor from an alpha

2017-10-12 Thread nusenu 


nusenu:
> Jacki M:
>> How do I revert back to a stable build of Tor from an alpha? Im running Tor 
>> 0.3.2.2-alpha and need to revert back to Tor 0.3.1.7.
>> Im running Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS.
> 
> this should be easy:
> 
> apt remove tor
> adjust sources.list to point to the stable repository (remove the
> experimental repo)
+
apt update
> apt install tor


-- 
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
twitter: @nusenu_



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Revert back to a stable build of Tor from an alpha

2017-10-12 Thread nusenu 
Jacki M:
> How do I revert back to a stable build of Tor from an alpha? Im running Tor 
> 0.3.2.2-alpha and need to revert back to Tor 0.3.1.7.
> Im running Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS.

this should be easy:

apt remove tor
adjust sources.list to point to the stable repository (remove the
experimental repo)
apt install tor


-- 
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
twitter: @nusenu_



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays