> As a last resort, try setting:
>
> DisableOOSCheck 1
Did you mean "DisableOOSCheck 0"?
"DisableOOSCheck 1" seems to be the default already (for Debian/Ubuntu and as
mentioned here
https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en#DisableOOSCheck).
> On 4 Jan 2018, at 09:24, teor wrote:
>
> there are about a million extra clients on the network since
> December. See this email for details:
>
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2017-December/014002.html
>
> If this is causing your relay issues, here
Hope it's not too late :)
11DF0017A43AF1F08825CD5D973297F81AB00FF3
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Thx for the wisdom ;-)
On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 at 00:09 teor wrote:
>
> > On 4 Jan 2018, at 09:52, r1610091651 wrote:
> >
> > Hi teor
> >
> > Thanks for the reply. I'm not having issues with my relay, and I've seen
> the mail about extra users indeed.
> On 4 Jan 2018, at 09:52, r1610091651 wrote:
>
> Hi teor
>
> Thanks for the reply. I'm not having issues with my relay, and I've seen the
> mail about extra users indeed. Just an observation, as I've just noticed few
> waves of these in last couple of hours. The
> On 4 Jan 2018, at 02:17, Jonathan Proulx wrote:
>
>
> A bit late to the party but
>
> A53C46F5B157DD83366D45A8E99A244934A14C46
Thanks!
There is still time for other operators to opt-in relays.
We'll start building the list over the next week or two.
A reminder:
We
Hi teor
Thanks for the reply. I'm not having issues with my relay, and I've seen
the mail about extra users indeed. Just an observation, as I've just
noticed few waves of these in last couple of hours. The start very abruptly
and end just as well.
Not an expert, but I find it statistically
>Other relays seeing this too?
For sure. Here is some recent reading material:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2017-December/013669.html
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2017-December/013771.html
> On 4 Jan 2018, at 08:52, r1610091651 wrote:
>
> Outcome of a script to count # connections /24 range
>
>
> 11 188.214.30.*
> 20 37.48.104.*
> 22 37.48.86.*
> 33 5.79.72.*
> 48 212.32.226.*
> 97 212.32.239.*
> 197 149.202.66.*
>
Outcome of a script to count # connections /24 range
11 188.214.30.*
20 37.48.104.*
22 37.48.86.*
33 5.79.72.*
48 212.32.226.*
97 212.32.239.*
197 149.202.66.*
294 5.79.103.*
303 198.7.59.*
358 207.244.110.*
380 162.210.192.*
394 207.244.70.*
A bit late to the party but
A53C46F5B157DD83366D45A8E99A244934A14C46
-Jon
--
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 01/02/2018 02:13 PM, Alison Macrina wrote:
> If you run a non-exit relay, would you be so kind as to go to
> wikipedia.org from that IP, click "edit" on any page, and report to me
> off-list if your relay is blocked or not? In your message, please give
> me your relay address and let me know
12 matches
Mail list logo