Well, I just tried, and no luck, see the attached video. I edited the torrc
file included with the torrc file to run the bridge, and after doing this,
it causes tor to immediately crash on startup before even making any logs.
This is what is entered in the torrc file, the same as what is
I'll increase it. I have two running from home, so I don't want to eat up too
much bandwidth, but I left the config at the default rate until certain it was
working. :)
William Pate
willp...@pm.me
512-947-3311
inadequate.net
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, March 27, 2020 5:09 AM,
This. Port 22 especially is a nightmare.
niftybunny
> On 27. Mar 2020, at 16:29, Toralf Förster wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> On 3/27/20 2:17 PM, ger...@bulger.co.uk wrote:
>> I have been free of abuse complaints and copyright claims for two years now.
> Well, the main problem here fore me is
On 3/27/20 2:17 PM, ger...@bulger.co.uk wrote:
> I have been free of abuse complaints and copyright claims for two years now.
Well, the main problem here fore me is to get complaints from my hoster itself
b/c any open address range are abused soon for port scans
--
Toralf
signature.asc
Thanks. Funny that my long time restricted IPv4 port 80 exit was noticed just
now giving the bad exit tag. I suspect the hour one of my server was
quarantined by my ISP may have precipitated the system to look hard.
As for my single /8 for port 80, for reason not clear to me, having many
teor:
> Hi,
>
>> On 27 Mar 2020, at 02:00, niftybunny
>> wrote:
>>
>> My bad. Never seen this before. I there a good reason for the accept
>> 133.0.0.0/8:80 ?
>>
>>> On 26. Mar 2020, at 15:06, ger...@bulger.co.uk wrote:
>>>
>>> "btw, you need to have at least port 80 and 443 … port 80 is
> On 27 Mar 2020, at 20:42, teor wrote:
>
>>> On 26. Mar 2020, at 15:06, ger...@bulger.co.uk wrote:
>>>
>>> "btw, you need to have at least port 80 and 443 … port 80 is missing …"
>>>
>>> It there. But to a /8 area IPV4, all IPv6
>>>
> The Exit flag only request one IPv4 /8 :
>
Hi,
> On 27 Mar 2020, at 02:00, niftybunny
> wrote:
>
> My bad. Never seen this before. I there a good reason for the accept
> 133.0.0.0/8:80 ?
>
>> On 26. Mar 2020, at 15:06, ger...@bulger.co.uk wrote:
>>
>> "btw, you need to have at least port 80 and 443 … port 80 is missing …"
>>
>> It
Thanks!
Looks like a small bandwidth rate, did you really mean
300 kilobytes per second?
T
--
teor
--
> On 26 Mar 2020, at 04:59, William Pate wrote:
>
>
> Set up another relay (this time on Raspberry Pi 4):
>
Hi,
> On 25 Mar 2020, at 06:35, Keifer Bly wrote:
>
> So I am currently running an OBFS4 bridge here:
>
> https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/386E99371B8CD938248940B754F16AAC54B5712B
>
> It is being done via the TOR expert bundle on Windows 10. I am wondering,
> would it be
10 matches
Mail list logo
