Re: [tor-relays] Question: RAM requirement for an exit relay

2020-12-14 Thread torix
I have several 1 G RAM exits running unbound without a problem. They never seem to hit swap, either. On FreeBSD: last pid: 83973; load averages: 0.86, 0.71, 0.62 up 130+15:44:28 16:02:04 23 processes: 2 running, 21 sleeping CPU: 43.1% user, 0.0% nice,

Re: [tor-relays] No port IPv4 80 so not an called exit even when 443 open wide.

2020-12-14 Thread Dr Gerard Bulger
No response! It seems I am alone in feeling it is an anachronism to require IPv4 open to Class A at least for a relay to be called an exit.Is it not an issue for anyone else? I got bad exit badge, to my shame, because of a narrow port 80 exit, despite 443 being wide open on IPv4 and

Re: [tor-relays] Question: RAM requirement for an exit relay

2020-12-14 Thread lists
On 14.12.2020 13:58, li...@for-privacy.net wrote: grep VmPeak/proc/$PID/status = 181836 kB A non exit has less: grep VmPeak/proc/$PID/status = 57336 kB tor-proxy-02.for-privacy.net ^^ -- ╰_╯ Ciao Marco! Debian GNU/Linux It's free software and it gives you freedom!

Re: [tor-relays] No port IPv4 80 so not an called exit even when 443 open wide.

2020-12-14 Thread lists
On 13.12.2020 18:32, Dr Gerard Bulger wrote: It seems I am alone in feeling it is an anachronism to require IPv4 open to Class A at least for a relay to be called an exit.Is it not an issue for anyone else? I got bad exit badge, to my shame, because of a narrow port 80 exit, despite

Re: [tor-relays] Question: RAM requirement for an exit relay

2020-12-14 Thread lists
On 14.12.2020 13:27, Toralf Förster wrote: On 12/14/20 1:15 PM, li...@for-privacy.net wrote: On both of my exits, unbound occupies 140-145MB RAM. Hhm, under a hardened stable Gentoo it occupiers 45 MB in RAM (virtual 378MB, but that involves all ever loaded libs before too) My way may be

Re: [tor-relays] Question: RAM requirement for an exit relay

2020-12-14 Thread Dmitrii Tcvetkov
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 20:37:22 +0100 Olaf Grimm wrote: > Hello! > > I would like to activate a local DNS resolver with unbound at the exit > relays, but I am concerned about the RAM size with 1GB. On an example > machine I have 2GB RAM and the exit relay occupies 400MB at 22.9 MiB/s > according

Re: [tor-relays] Question: RAM requirement for an exit relay

2020-12-14 Thread Toralf Förster
On 12/14/20 1:15 PM, li...@for-privacy.net wrote: On both of my exits, unbound occupies 140-145MB RAM. Hhm, under a hardened stable Gentoo it occupiers 45 MB in RAM (virtual 378MB, but that involves all ever loaded libs before too) -- Toralf ___

Re: [tor-relays] Question: RAM requirement for an exit relay

2020-12-14 Thread lists
On 12.12.2020 20:37, Olaf Grimm wrote: I would like to activate a local DNS resolver with unbound at the exit relays, but I am concerned about the RAM size with 1GB. On an example machine I have 2GB RAM and the exit relay occupies 400MB at 22.9 MiB/s according to the metrics. Does anyone have

Re: [tor-relays] reporting Abusive exit nodes

2020-12-14 Thread Corl3ss
Hi, > > On 04.12.2020 05:21, BRBfGWMz wrote: > > > I frequently find abusive exit nodes. Is there any way to report these > > > to the > > > tor consensus system, so it deprioritizes them? > Could you share what makes you define these nodes as abusive ? There is work in progress on this, it

[tor-relays] Question: RAM requirement for an exit relay

2020-12-14 Thread Olaf Grimm
Hello! I would like to activate a local DNS resolver with unbound at the exit relays, but I am concerned about the RAM size with 1GB. On an example machine I have 2GB RAM and the exit relay occupies 400MB at 22.9 MiB/s according to the metrics. Does anyone have experience with such values? My