Re: [tor-relays] Inflated throughput measures from torproject metrics?

2021-09-02 Thread torix via tor-relays
Thank you Georg; that is really helpful to understand. (Not the least in making me drill down to the relay level and find that even though the relay list shows the right number of relays in MyFamily, they are not all effective. And I'm on nusenu's myfamily shitlist:

Re: [tor-relays] New round of measuring the accuracy of Tor relays' advertised bandwidth

2021-09-02 Thread Toralf Förster
On 9/2/21 9:11 AM, Georg Koppen wrote: No. As far as it matters for the test those two relays are independent relays which each get tested as two random relays would get. Except, that both shares the same network card ... -- Toralf ___ tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Inflated throughput measures from torproject metrics?

2021-09-02 Thread Georg Koppen
Hello! torix via tor-relays: > Dear Georg, > > I don't understand that a ddos attack would affect bumping up the advertised > bandwidth - or would it? My Aramis family advertised bandwidth seems to have > leveled off 2 days ago, but not gone down to previous levels. I noted the > total

Re: [tor-relays] New round of measuring the accuracy of Tor relays' advertised bandwidth

2021-09-02 Thread Georg Koppen
Toralf Förster: > On 8/25/21 12:02 PM, Georg Koppen wrote: >> Hello! >> >> You might recall we ran two "speed tests" so far for investigating the >> accuracy of a relay's advertised bandwidth, one in 2021[1] and another >> one earlier this year[2]. > > I do run 2 relays at the same ip address. >

Re: [tor-relays] Did obfs4proxy stopped working for you on Debian Buster or Bullseye?

2021-09-02 Thread s7r
s7r wrote: I have edited /lib/systemd/system/tor@default.service & tor@.service to NoNewPrivileges=no and also installed libcap2-bin and setcap +ep to obfs4proxy executable. The libcap2-bin step is because I want to bind to a lower port, but even if I try to bind to a higher port like 50001 it