Re: [tor-relays] snowflake incoming UDP ports

2022-02-21 Thread meskio
Quoting Toralf Förster (2022-02-21 22:06:36) > On 2/19/22 12:48, meskio wrote: > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- My contact info: > > https://meskio.net/crypto.txt > > OT, but: You're still at freenode ? No, I left a while ago, but looks like I forgot to update that document.

Re: [tor-relays] snowflake incoming UDP ports

2022-02-21 Thread Toralf Förster
On 2/19/22 12:48, meskio wrote: If you have restricted NAT I would recommend you to open the UDP port range of 32768-60999. Thx, I opened those UDP ports for incoming UDP traffic. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- My contact info: https://meskio.net/crypto.txt OT, but:

Re: [tor-relays] Reduced exit and not IPv4 exit traffic at all

2022-02-21 Thread yl
On 2/19/22 00:06, nusenu wrote: You can run a relay that does allow exiting to IPv6 and not IPv4 but it will not get the exit flag. Which means what? Will it be use for exit at all? Would be sad to loose this 300MBit/s fully used Exit. yl ___

Re: [tor-relays] Reduced exit and not IPv4 exit traffic at all

2022-02-21 Thread yl
On 2/18/22 16:13, li...@for-privacy.net wrote: Before changing exit policies, read 'man torrc' carefully. SERVER OPTIONS ExitPolicy* and IPv6Exit. ah, there is is buried. I didn't know that there is man torrc, I always looked that up online in the 2019 documentation, or before that in the

Re: [tor-relays] Reduced exit and not IPv4 exit traffic at all

2022-02-21 Thread yl
Hello On 2/17/22 21:20, Martin Gebhardt wrote: ExitPolicy accept [::]:20-21 # FTP, SSH, telnet ExitPolicy accept [::]:23 # FTP, SSH, telnet ExitPolicy accept [::]:43 # WHOIS [..] ExitPolicy reject *:* Oh yes, I will try that. Now that you write it here I could also keep some other IPv4 ports