On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 06:19:06PM +0200, li...@for-privacy.net wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 17. August 2022 19:31:48 CEST Logforme wrote:
> > I run the relay 8F6A78B1EA917F2BF221E87D14361C050A70CCC3
> >
> > I have tried to mitigate the current DoS by implemented connection
> > limits in my iptables
On 8/18/22 22:10, li...@for-privacy.net wrote:
IPv6 connections should better be limited to /48 subnets in the Tor protocol.
Or /32
Limiting IPv6 to N connections per /64 will definitely affect relays of
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#search/2a0b:f4c2:2
Similar to their /24 IPv4
On 8/19/2022 12:21 AM, Georg Koppen wrote:
Eddie:
I have 1 relay (40D13096BBD11AF198CE61DEE4EAECCE5472F2E7) that
according to the metrics is always bouncing between online and
offline, sometimes multiple times per day. The logs show it running
the whole time and when the metrics also show it
Eddie:
I have 1 relay (40D13096BBD11AF198CE61DEE4EAECCE5472F2E7) that according
to the metrics is always bouncing between online and offline, sometimes
multiple times per day. The logs show it running the whole time and
when the metrics also show it running, the uptime continues to increase
I have 1 relay (40D13096BBD11AF198CE61DEE4EAECCE5472F2E7) that according
to the metrics is always bouncing between online and offline, sometimes
multiple times per day. The logs show it running the whole time and
when the metrics also show it running, the uptime continues to increase
