ally look after the abuse complaint.
best regards
Dirk
On 29.01.2016 15:09, Josef Stautner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I responded them the first few times. After I got angry about automated
> abuse I ignored them.
> Just answering your ISP is fine.
>
> ~Josef
>
> Am 29.01.20
Hello,
I observed the same thing on our new exit. atlas says its down - but
actually it is working. Did you test if you could exit through your
relay at this time ?
best regards
Dirk
On 11.08.2017 16:28, Paul Templeton wrote:
> Another odd thin is atlas will say its down for say three ho
-00-vote-EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97-BEB84799E48C9911E040B5DA6B11EC5281886128
The problem here is. Since the process is running neiter my scripts nor
systemd will try to restart it.
best regards
Dirk
On 14.08.2017 05:08, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 08:5
to the network operator.
Any hint where this improved fail2ban config comes from is welcome.
best regards
Dirk
On 10.08.2017 22:15, Keepyourprivacy wrote:
> I can‘t talk about the source, but there are indeed more and more
> script kiddies out there who use Tor or VPNs just to test
st regards
Dirk
[1] https://tornull.org/
[2] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy
[3] https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL113323
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-b
ughput it
feels like a dirty solution to do this auto restart.
best regards
Dirk
p.s. Nusenu - it seem onionoo responds better now - was there a solution
to the problem
On 25.05.2017 10:54, nusenu wrote:
> Hi Dirk,
>
> I noticed your comment [1] about your plans to write a script th
rming each entry is needed."
Who is behind tornull ? And how are they validating their negative list ?
It might help some relays on difficult providers like Digital Ocean but
in the end it is a censorship which makes part of the internet
unavailabe to tor users.
best regards
Dirk
On 01.
y the tor project and
how can we as organizations and operators support it
best regards
Dirk
Tor support team digitale-gesellschaft.ch
[1]
https://medium.com/@nusenu/the-growing-problem-of-malicious-relays-on-the-tor-network-2f14198af548
___
tor-re
ized.
What are the criteria for tor exit node server traffic distribution ?
How do the clients choose the exit ?
I would be very happy if you could provide some answers / documentation
which will set me on the right track.
Thanks very much for you help.
Dirk
[1] https://globe.torproject.org/#/se
. Removing stream.
I get very much of these. It does not look healthy to me.
Is this normal ?
Again many thanks for your help.
best regards
Dirk
On 14.12.2015 00:06, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
>
>> On 14 Dec 2015, at 07:18, Dirk Eschbach <tor-relay.d...@o.banes.ch
>> &
ally
>if you decide to paste your logs on a public mailing list.
Sure - nothing in there which is a problem. :-)
Thanks again for helping.
best regards dirk
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/
Hi torland,
thank you very much for all your efforts.
best regards
Dirk
On 15.02.2017 22:55, tor-ad...@torland.is wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after 5 years of operation I will shutdown TorLand1
> (https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/E1E922A20AF608728824A620BADC6EFC8CB8C2B8)
>
&
the problem will go away.
best regards
Dirk
[1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/22255
[2]https://twitter.com/FrennVunDerEnn/status/864583496072876034
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https
Hello Roger,
I updated the ticket. You will find the output of the valgrind there as
well:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/22255/valgrind.txt
best regards
Dirk
On 23.05.2017 06:00, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 03:01:10AM +, John Ricke
It was two days ago. Today I can not reach it as well.
best regards
Dirk
On 01.05.2017 08:08, scar wrote:
> I was unable to reach the site, is it still in operation?
>
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproj
.
But this seems to be the setting of fail2ban which checks also the
network abuse record.
best regards
Dirk
On 13.09.2017 15:49, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> tl;dr: We're thinking about introducing an auto responder to abuse mail
> which then requires clicking a link or replying to th
it.
In the end we disabled port 22. After all - any sysadmin who wants to
have peace and ever looked a ssh config will have its listen port
somewhere else than 22.
best regards
Dirk
On 05.10.2017 19:08, AMuse wrote:
> Hi all! I'm getting a number of ISP Abuse complaints around outbound
> ssh
17 matches
Mail list logo